SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

5555

Created by: Maj
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 30, 2019
Published: Jul. 30, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$3,500,000
4$800,000
4$925,000
4$800,000
4$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$7,500,000
5$3,500,000
Trades
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,000,000$82,052,616$0$132,500$947,384
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$805,833$805,833 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 30, 2019 at 10:07 p.m.
#1
GM - Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 1,218
This trade makes absolutely no sense for the Maple Leafs. Why would the Leafs trade Mitch Marner who is a franchise player and possible generational player for 3 questionable players. The Leafs can simply promote players from the Marlies instead of taking these players. Marner is a game changer and has lead the team in points the last 2 years and would have lead the team in his first year if he did not miss some games because of health issues.
The Leafs have been waiting for over 25 years to obtain a unique player like Marner and you want to trade him away for nothing. You are actually starting to remind me of Marc Bergavin, the most incompetent GM in the NHL. In my opinion, Marner will be playing with the Leafs longer than both Matthews and Nylander, so he is not going to be traded. Both Dubbas and Babcock will be run out of Toronto if the Leafs trade Marner.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 10:12 p.m.
#2
LEAFSandBRUINSfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 461
Quoting: TMLSage
This trade makes absolutely no sense for the Maple Leafs. Why would the Leafs trade Mitch Marner who is a franchise player and possible generational player for 3 questionable players. The Leafs can simply promote players from the Marlies instead of taking these players. Marner is a game changer and has lead the team in points the last 2 years and would have lead the team in his first year if he did not miss some games because of health issues.
The Leafs have been waiting for over 25 years to obtain a unique player like Marner and you want to trade him away for nothing. You are actually starting to remind me of Marc Bergavin, the most incompetent GM in the NHL. In my opinion, Marner will be playing with the Leafs longer than both Matthews and Nylander, so he is not going to be traded. Both Dubbas and Babcock will be run out of Toronto if the Leafs trade Marner.


Marner is no where near franchise or generational. He’s not even the best rfa available
NR1203, Sign_em_up000000 and Maj liked this.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 10:20 p.m.
#3
GM - Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 1,218
Quoting: Snipshow4416
Marner is no where near franchise or generational. He’s not even the best rfa available


Totally disagree with your statement as Marner is the best RFA. Find it troubling that you make a statement but then do not provide the name of the best RFA in your humble opinion. Marner is a franchise player as he was in top 11 point producers and lead league in primary points at even strength. Which is more than McDavid. He also did it in 200 less minutes than McDavid. He is generational player and which most fans have not realized yet but they will. Do me a favour and google awards won by Mitch Marner in his last year of junior with the London Knights and then name me a current player in the NHL that won an equal amount of trophies while playing in major junior. Also, ask yourself why Taveres agreed to come to TO if he could play with Marner.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 10:34 p.m.
#4
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,592
Likes: 3,068
Quoting: TMLSage
Totally disagree with your statement as Marner is the best RFA. Find it troubling that you make a statement but then do not provide the name of the best RFA in your humble opinion. Marner is a franchise player as he was in top 11 point producers and lead league in primary points at even strength. Which is more than McDavid. He also did it in 200 less minutes than McDavid. He is generational player and which most fans have not realized yet but they will. Do me a favour and google awards won by Mitch Marner in his last year of junior with the London Knights and then name me a current player in the NHL that won an equal amount of trophies while playing in major junior. Also, ask yourself why Taveres agreed to come to TO if he could play with Marner.


At least we've found Paul Marner's CapFriendly account.

I know you love your son and should be proud of him, but he's not a generational player and no one cares about junior awards.
NR1203, Sign_em_up000000, Maj and 1 other person liked this.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 10:41 p.m.
#5
V5 ANA and BOG
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 691
Quoting: TMLSage
This trade makes absolutely no sense for the Maple Leafs. Why would the Leafs trade Mitch Marner who is a franchise player and possible generational player for 3 questionable players. The Leafs can simply promote players from the Marlies instead of taking these players. Marner is a game changer and has lead the team in points the last 2 years and would have lead the team in his first year if he did not miss some games because of health issues.
The Leafs have been waiting for over 25 years to obtain a unique player like Marner and you want to trade him away for nothing. You are actually starting to remind me of Marc Bergavin, the most incompetent GM in the NHL. In my opinion, Marner will be playing with the Leafs longer than both Matthews and Nylander, so he is not going to be traded. Both Dubbas and Babcock will be run out of Toronto if the Leafs trade Marner.


Calm down, Paul. Marner isn't the best RFA (Rantanen is), and he's not a franchise/generational talent. Elite? Yes. But not franchise/generational. Also, are you sure you know who Matt Dumba is? A "questionable player", he is not. He's an elite, young RHD. Not as good/valuable as Marner, but Donato makes up for part of it. Replace Seeler with a couple of picks (2 2nds) and Dubas has something to think about.
Sign_em_up000000 and Maj liked this.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 10:42 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Good job Maj
Maj liked this.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 10:49 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
AAAHHH !!! FIRE !!!!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 597
Likes: 213
I can't believe the dude called Dumba a questionable player..... sheesh ... look the other 2 are ok, do you know why ? Marner for Dumba would mean the leafs lose out a bit of a value, and so the other 2 offset the balance. But, Dumba is anything but questionable, the dude is a ****ing rock ... in the best way possible. He is what you need in defence if you want the D line locked down. He knows how to do his job and does it really well with lots of skill.
Sign_em_up000000 and NR1203 liked this.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 10:55 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: Maj
I can't believe the dude called Dumba a questionable player..... sheesh ... look the other 2 are ok, do you know why ? Marner for Dumba would mean the leafs lose out a bit of a value, and so the other 2 offset the balance. But, Dumba is anything but questionable, the dude is a ****ing rock ... in the best way possible. He is what you need in defence if you want the D line locked down. He knows how to do his job and does it really well with lots of skill.


You got it right! brah, I would be fine with adding Zucker for financial purposes from their end and adding a bit from our end.
Maj liked this.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 11:03 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
AAAHHH !!! FIRE !!!!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 597
Likes: 213
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
You got it right! brah, I would be fine with adding Zucker for financial purposes from their end and adding a bit from our end.


I made sure not to get Zucker just because I wanted the extra money to use to buy Gudas, so that we can have 5 rotating d men, so that if one if feeling tired or not playing great, babs would give him less time and increase the time for the other. Also, in case of injury, having one quality player to throw in your top 4 won't hurt the skill level.
Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 11:07 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: Maj
I made sure not to get Zucker just because I wanted the extra money to use to buy Gudas, so that we can have 5 rotating d men, so that if one if feeling tired or not playing great, babs would give him less time and increase the time for the other. Also, in case of injury, having one quality player to throw in your top 4 won't hurt the skill level.


I get it, but I was talking about the financial aspect from their end, but if they would be fine with it then so would I.
Maj liked this.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 11:15 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,923
Likes: 14,597
Quoting: TMLSage
Totally disagree with your statement as Marner is the best RFA. Find it troubling that you make a statement but then do not provide the name of the best RFA in your humble opinion. Marner is a franchise player as he was in top 11 point producers and lead league in primary points at even strength. Which is more than McDavid. He also did it in 200 less minutes than McDavid. He is generational player and which most fans have not realized yet but they will. Do me a favour and google awards won by Mitch Marner in his last year of junior with the London Knights and then name me a current player in the NHL that won an equal amount of trophies while playing in major junior. Also, ask yourself why Taveres agreed to come to TO if he could play with Marner.


No one cares about awards won in juniors. Jesus christ
Maj liked this.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 11:22 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
AAAHHH !!! FIRE !!!!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 597
Likes: 213
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
No one cares about awards won in juniors. Jesus christ


that sounds like something George or his father would say, not jerry.
Jul. 31, 2019 at 6:19 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,923
Likes: 14,597
Quoting: Maj
that sounds like something George or his father would say, not jerry.


"And what's the deal with grown men fawning over high school age awards?"
Maj liked this.
Jul. 31, 2019 at 6:30 a.m.
#14
LEAFSandBRUINSfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 461
Quoting: TMLSage
This trade makes absolutely no sense for the Maple Leafs. Why would the Leafs trade Mitch Marner who is a franchise player and possible generational player for 3 questionable players. The Leafs can simply promote players from the Marlies instead of taking these players. Marner is a game changer and has lead the team in points the last 2 years and would have lead the team in his first year if he did not miss some games because of health issues.
The Leafs have been waiting for over 25 years to obtain a unique player like Marner and you want to trade him away for nothing. You are actually starting to remind me of Marc Bergavin, the most incompetent GM in the NHL. In my opinion, Marner will be playing with the Leafs longer than both Matthews and Nylander, so he is not going to be traded. Both Dubbas and Babcock will be run out of Toronto if the Leafs trade Marner.


Stop embarrassing yourself you’re literally the only one in the world who thinks marner is generational lol. And I’d take point who’s a 40 goal 100 point centre over mitch any day
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll