SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Not my usual Forte

Created by: Maj
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 31, 2019
Published: Jul. 31, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
First try at Chicago, I know you guys will let me know where and how I **** up..... but explain why it's bad and not just scream it is bad.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$1,250,000
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$68,238,353$0$3,357,500$13,261,647
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,400,000$1,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 31, 2019 at 5:18 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
IT'S BAD...lol
Jul. 31, 2019 at 6:58 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 672
Speaking of Fortes in Chicago, remember Matt Forte? What ever happened to that guy?
Jul. 31, 2019 at 7:54 a.m.
#3
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 9,740
Edited Jul. 31, 2019 at 8:32 a.m.
Quoting: aspina25
Speaking of Fortes in Chicago, remember Matt Forte? What ever happened to that guy?


He became a New York Jet and since retired. Does broadcasting back in Chicago now with Lance Briggs and Alex Brown.

As for the trade. Seabrook's value has never been lower than it is right now. I know I'm bias here, but I also look into the details more than most on this site do. Seabrook clearly isn't fast and can't hold his own pairing like he used to be able to do. BUT, he shouldn't be forced with literally (5) 1st timers and the likes of Brandon Davidson/Daniel Manning last year. Seriously, Seabs played ~20% of the season with Keith (and played pretty good), but the other ~80% was with a rotating cast of AHLers or Rookies. He shouldn't have been put in that position and he won't be going forward.
Maj liked this.
Jul. 31, 2019 at 8:26 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
AAAHHH !!! FIRE !!!!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 597
Likes: 213
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
IT'S BAD...lol


at least I got rid of the Seabrook contract, and bobby ryan is only there for 3 years , opposed to 6
Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Jul. 31, 2019 at 10:08 a.m.
#5
N/a
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 131
Likes: 48
Seabrook should be traded due to the salary. He isn’t as bad as people think, but sure as hell not worth the cap hit. Also, people want Seabs gone to make it easier to resign Debricat and strome. Trade is a lose lose for both teams with the hawks taking on even more salary, not shedding it
Maj liked this.
Jul. 31, 2019 at 3:46 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: Maj
at least I got rid of the Seabrook contract, and bobby ryan is only there for 3 years , opposed to 6


Ask yourself why would Ottawa take on 3 more years of a bad contact? Chicago offered the 3rd overall pick in this past draft to try to get a team to take on Seabrook and got no takers. Remember you have to look at trades from both teams perspective.
Maj liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll