Goalies are always tough to value. I'd remove Saros and replace with prospect. I'd think the following would be perfectly fair for Hall:
1. Forsberg
2. Prospect (not Tolvanen but Davies, Allard, Harper level)
3. Conditional pick (1st if he resigns, 3rd if he doesn't)
Quoting: AFOX10900
NSH rejects, Hall isn't that much better than FF, but FF is on a steal of a contract, Saros is the future of their goaltending, AND a first
FF is very good. But Hall is, in fact, much better.
Quoting: coga16
Stone to Vegas is your comparable, bc Stone had an extension in place as part of the deal..... A top prospect in Brannstrom, a 3rd line forward Oscar Lindberg , and a 2nd round pick. Not a Top line player, a Top en d back up with Starter potential and a 1st rounder
I would take Stone over Hall when you look at how good Defensively Stone is and is still a ppg winger
Stone is close in value, but the trade is not very good comp. OTT and NJD are at different stages of their rebuilds. Stone was deadline deal. And Stone picked where he wanted to play, which limited his return. So, Hall probably gets more established player back, less of a prospect.