SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Chicago Blackhawks NHL 20 Ratings

Created by: nalzugaray12
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 6, 2019
Published: Aug. 6, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Kane- 92 (EXACT MED Franchise PLY)
Toews- 89 (EXACT MED Elite TWF)
Debrincat- 86 (HIGH Top 6 SNP)
Saad- 83 (MED Top 6 TWF)
Shaw- 83 (EXACT MED Top 6 GRN)
Strome- 82 (MED Elite PLY)
Z.Smith- 80 (EXACT MED Top 9 TWF)
Kampf- 79 (HIGH Top 9 TWF)
Caggiula- 79 (HIGH Top 9 TWF)
Perlini- 78 (MED Top 6 SNP)
Carpenter- 77 (EXACT MED Bottom 6 TWF)
Sikura- 76 (LOW Top 6 SNP)
Fortin- 73 (MED Bottom 6 TWF)

Keith- 85 (EXACT High Top 4 TWD)
Gustafsson- 84 (MED Top 4 OFD)
Seabrook- 83 (EXACT MED Top 4 TWD)
De Haan- 81 (EXACT MED Top 4 TWD)
Maata- 81(LOW Top 4 DFD)
C. Murphy- 80 (LOW Top 4 DFD)
Koekkoek- 78(MED Top 6 TWD)

Crawford- 86 (EXACT LOW Elite)
Lehner- 85 (EXACT High Starter)

PROSPECTS

Forwards

Dach- 77 (MED Elite PWF)
Nylander- 75 (HIGH Top 6 PLY)
Ejdsell- 73 (MED Bottom 6 PWF)
Kayumov- 72 (MED Top 6 SNP)
Altybarmakyan- 70 (MED Top 9 PLY)
Barratt-70 (HIGH Top 9 TWF)
Nordgren- 67 (MED Top 9 SNP)

Defense

Dahlstrom- 77 (MED Top 6 DFD)
Boqvist- 75 (MED Elite OFD)
Beaudin- 74 (MED Top 4 TWD)
Krys- 74 (MED Top 4 TWD)
Mitchell- 74 (MED Top 4 TWD)
A. Vlasic- 64 (MED Top 4 DFD)

Goalies

Delia- 77 (MED Backup)
A.Gravel- 65 (MED AHL Starter)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$64,938,353$0$2,507,500$16,561,647
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,400,000$1,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 6, 2019 at 3:30 p.m.
#1
LEAFSandBRUINSfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 461
Drop towes by 2. And Shaw and seabrookand Crawford
Aug. 6, 2019 at 3:33 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 522
I think you’re a little too high on Nylander and actually lowballing Ejdsell. The overalls are fine but I’d give Nylander medium top 6 and Ejdsell medium top 9. Everything else I’m cool with. Nice work
Aug. 6, 2019 at 3:38 p.m.
#3
Dr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 1,413
Crawford being an 87 is a little extreme
Aug. 6, 2019 at 3:39 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 242
Likes: 110
You don't have to put high/med/low if they're exact
ChytilMania liked this.
Aug. 6, 2019 at 3:39 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Bahston Brewins
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 891
Likes: 258
Quoting: BruinsFan35
I think you’re a little too high on Nylander and actually lowballing Ejdsell. The overalls are fine but I’d give Nylander medium top 6 and Ejdsell medium top 9. Everything else I’m cool with. Nice work


I don't see Ejdsell as a third liner in the NHL. If he makes it, more than likely on the fourth line or will step up to the third for injury purposes. I can't give him anything higher than a 73 due to his underwhelming statistics in the minors and his limited 6 games of NHL experience.

As for Nylander, I gave him high top 6 due to his current change of scenery and draft position. I can see why MED Top 6 potential may be better but he's only 21 and this season coming up will be the difference maker if he's a High Top 6, Medium Top 6, or if things really fall apart, Low Top 6.

Thanks for the feedback
Aug. 6, 2019 at 3:40 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Bahston Brewins
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 891
Likes: 258
Quoting: jspenc40
You don't have to put high/med/low if they're exact


The High, med, low effects their simulation. If you go to the "Edit Player" screen, no matter what age you are, you can edit their high, medium, or low potentials.
Aug. 6, 2019 at 3:44 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Bahston Brewins
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 891
Likes: 258
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
Crawford being an 87 is a little extreme


re-looked at his stats and bumped him down to an 86. He missed too many games for me to give him a major downgrade. His stats the past 6 years have been very good and also stopped me from giving him a huge downgrade
Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:44 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 242
Likes: 110
Quoting: nalzugaray12
The High, med, low effects their simulation. If you go to the "Edit Player" screen, no matter what age you are, you can edit their high, medium, or low potentials.


I understand that. But that sets the likelihood that the player will reach that potential. Once they finish developing in the game, they become "Exact" Elite/Top 6/Bottom 6/etc. The Exact replaces the High/Med/Low. I know you can change it on the edit player screen, but that's not how the ratings work in the game.
Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:47 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Bahston Brewins
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 891
Likes: 258
Quoting: jspenc40
I understand that. But that sets the likelihood that the player will reach that potential. Once they finish developing in the game, they become "Exact" Elite/Top 6/Bottom 6/etc. The Exact replaces the High/Med/Low. I know you can change it on the edit player screen, but that's not how the ratings work in the game.


That's not true. If you give 33 year old Bergeron "High" Elite, he will likely stay at an elite potential for a few years. If you give him "Low" Elite, he can see a downgrade in his potential quicker.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll