There's huge value difference between OTT and PIT trades for instance. From PIT you're getting their top winger and two good, not that great prospects, while from OTT you're basically dragging the whole organisation...

The difference there is that Ottawa is rival team divisional and Pens are not, but still yeah, one of those 3 assets from Ottawa after brady should be out.

Also CHI is getting out relatively cheap compared to other teams. Only Saad, Barratt and a pick that's possibly going to be below 20th, if they added Marner they honestly look really good.

Saad would be a beast in toronto imo and Barratt is amazing. That 2020 1st from them could be anywhere lets be honest. I wanted Boqvist but I doubt that would go through.

Even still compared to other returns that's extremely low in value. Huge risk of becoming another Hall for Larsson trade...

Yeah might be but that draft is very deep and I already have top-31 done and oh boy even in 30s there would be huge names! But yeah.. Could've added Ian Mitchell and have that pick in 2022.

Yeah I agree with Burger Boss,

seems with some trades u value marner high then on others ur pretty much trading him as top 6 forward who is in his late 20s/early 30s

These are all over the place, Samuel.

The part where you admit Dallas isn't trading Klingberg or Heiskanen? That's Dumba for the Wild, who definitely wouldn't be adding a 2nd. Whether you think it's "fair" or not, he's too important to the team.

MTL accepts

No thanks from Buffalo

Jones has no interest in playing for the Leafs. He is the best defenseman in the league and should cost way more. Like Marner + Kapanen + 1st Round pick.

Jersey trade swaps Mikey Mcleod for Reily Walsh.
Our D are too thin, Tor fans liked in Mississauga no?

No way in hell you're getting both Larkin+Mantha for Marner. The guy is a cancer right now. Sorry but we'll keep both Larkin and Mantha over baby Marner. Detroit easily declines. Losing both Larkin and Mantha by gaining Marner does nothing for our rebuild what so ever.

For minnesota it would be Spurgeon or Brodin. Dumba is our future superstar on D.

Did you read additional info to that trade or not?

Too thin? I dont agree but yeah Id do it. Maybe add late pick to McLeod but Id do that.

Yes i read and it's a joke? Gaining Marner while losing both Larkin and Mantha sets back our rebuild a year or two. Detroit's not in position to take on Marner while losing both Larkin and Mantha they're pretty much half of our offense. And Marner wont make up for losing both players.

I like marner quite a bit, but reinhart has done nothing but improve every year and is looking like a safe 25g70p guy. The add here to get marner is jokiharju and what probably is 2 firsts. I tend to overvalue guys that i think are "difference makers", but i dont think i can go this far. Plus several of the other trades where the value is less, which makes me think reinhart is just getting no love.

Not a joke. I literally said you will not trade Larkin no matter what offer is presented because he is great and gonna be captain. And just like Jones in CBJ it makes zero sense for Columbus to do it. I would love to have Larkin but thats just a no-go from Detroit. Thats what I meant, not a ****ing joke.

Get that second pick out of there than. Reinhart, Jokiharju and 2020 1st, would you do it?

No

Why is that so?

Because I dont think there is too much difference between reinhart and marner to justify the salary difference and the other parts of the trade

Not enough players ready to play at NHL level, not physically thin. Although our D is not the largest in the league!
Walsh is a righty, and I think Josh Jacobs is the only one in Albany who might be ready to play. Walsh will be top RHD at Harvard this year and may be ready soon! We have C depth now and I chose MM because of where he played as much as what we have to offer