Mark Stone is a top 10 winger

Mark Stone and Mikko Rantanen are upset at this list

Mark stone has to make this list.

He's the best defensive winger by a mile and top 15 offensively.

Marchand is a little too high but certainly belongs on the list

Panarin should be lower. May or may not deserve to be on the list

Gaudreau should be higher.

Laine deserves it by potential but has sucked for half a season

Kucherov
Kane
Ovechkin
Marchand
Panarin
Rantenan
Draisaitl
Stone
Laine

For some reason Laine and Rantanen aren't with their teams so I only put Laine on but I think Rantanen is definelty in the top 10

That's fair. I have a problem with greedy players too?

Free agents aren't in create teams.

Rantanen isn't better than anyone on the list besides maybe tarasenko and pastrnak and stone are better than him

Laine is not a top 10 winger. Way to inconsistent.

1. Kucherov
2. Kane
3. Ovechkin
4. Marchand
5. Stone
6. Rantenen
7. Panarin
8. Marner
9. Pastranak
10. Draisaitl

i would add pastrnak to that. Honestly, I would ditch Laine. He's been so wildly inconsistent that I don't really trust him. Pastrnak, Stone, and Rantanen in, Laine, Tank, and Hall out.

Laine isn't a top 20 winger, let alone a top 10 winger

Rantanen at 6 is mega LOL.

Rantanen isn't a top 10 winger. Not even top 15

right....name 15 wingers you would take over Rants

Not in any order: Stone, Kane, Kucherov, Pastrnak, Wheeler, Gallagher, Dadonov, Panarin, Ovechkin, Marner, Giroux, Hall, Arivdsson, Gaudreau, Debrincat, Guentzel, Marchessault, Zucker, Meier, Ehlers, Tarasenko, Tatar, Huberdeau, Draisaitl, Vrana, Benn, Pavelski, Schwartz, Forsberg, M Tkachuk, and then maybe even some guys like Landeskog, Kessel, Voracek, Schenn and Connor

To be honest Guenzel is not that good. Heres why, Crosby is

Guenzel is not that good. Here's why, Crosby is a playmaker and always passes to his team mates which happens to be Guenzel. So he almost always gets one timer goals. So with out Crosby he wouldn't be that good. To be honest the only Penguins who have skill are Crosby, Malkin, Letang and a few others.

you just proved how you are wrong with some of the guys you listed there. What did Rantanen do to you, how did he hurt you

I wouldn't go as far to say Guenzel isn't skilled. I agree his goal totals are inflated due to Crosby. But he would still be a 30 Goal 70pt player on any other top line in the league.

I would say that those 6-10 players could be interchangeable, along with Gaudreau, Wheeler, Hall, Debrincat and Tkachuk. There could be any debate over the 6-15 players. But IMO that top 5 is pretty set.

Bruh wtf kind of list is that

Are you putting marner and panarin and Rantanen above pastrnak and draisatl?

Gaudreau? He is certainly better. Hall? Guy who won the MVP season before last?

Marchand is not a step above Gaudreau.

Ovi, Kane, Kucherov are the top 3. I'd have Gaudreau at 4.

Hall had one outstanding season other than that he has only had above 55pts 3 times in his career.

As for Marner, Panarin, Rantenen, Pastranak and Draisaitl I said they could all be interchangeable and are on the same level.

Read down in the comments

.

Marchand is better then him defensively, puts up more points then him and is more dominant. How is Gaudreau better than him?

A list of wingers that are better than Rantanen, that's what it is

Rantanen isn't a top-end winger, he can't produce at a high level without Mackinnon. Being a leech off the 3rd best center in the league doesn't make him a high-end winger. He can't drive play that well and he can't carry his own line.

You say I'm wrong yet you can't provide any proof to show that Rantanen is better than any of the players I listed.