Your first problem is referencing Sporting News, which has zero credibility. Your second problem is referencing an article that has spectacular glaring administrative and critical errors. You're not as smart as you think you are.

Uhhh... He's pretty much demonstrated he's only a 4th liner, with maybe, and a big maybe, a chance to be a bit more. His stock is so low, no one is offering anything substantial, or he would have been traded. I always enjoy sarcastic know-it-all posts which show they know nothing.

eh, I watched every game last year, Sorensen played on the 3rd line, but he's probably a tweener. He would excel at a 4th line roll and, like he did last year, he burns out in a 3rd line roll.

The Oilers will want more than a role player and a mid-round pick for Puljujarvi. No dice.

I you sure look like you know
Better than anyone with all the pretentious thing. By the way the athletic by corey pronman as about the same value as Steve Kournianos. Even with is very poor production pulju have only 130 nhl career game played so he still could turn up big, for
Sorensen the biggest rise he could face at 28 year is to play third line with a futur all of famer joe thorton and rack up another 30 -35 point and made people made funny trade proposal with a 30 year old guys for 21 years old players

Really? Corey and Steve are considered equally reputable? Man, no. No they aren't. Not even remotely. Corey is substantially more respected and has been significantly more accurate. Even this article demonstrates how bad Steve is, with all the significant omissions of prospects on multiple teams.

Since you since to know it all you sure know bob mackenzie, darren dreger, nhl central scouting. They doesn’t all agree, on the rankings you know why? Because the list is made by each individual person they select players they like more. There no official list or more accurate list it all based on opinion. Because everyone know the stats and now with internet you could
Fallow every players from almost every where on earth. But if pronman is higher on a guys then steve or bob mackenzie it doesn’t mean that he know better it just a matter of preference because at this level there little that could translate in nhl players or in professional players elsewhere but this isnt science

Where your post about you playing junior hockey??? would you tell you mama that i been mean to you. She will cavil me ???

Wrong. Bob, Darren, Pierre are insiders and know hockey, but they aren't experts in the way that Corey and others are, and almost always defer to them. Bob, Pierre, Darren do not develop the NHL central scouting rankings, and almost always they use them as reference only to build their rankings. There is a reason Sporting News is almost never referenced by the insiders, and a reason why Corey is regularly referenced. There is a reason Corey is writing for the premier hockey publication, and Steve is writing for a throwaway.

???? i’m still waiting for your
Hockey db stats since you play junior hockey

I don’t know what is your problem, but you have reading issues. So no im not wrong, and since you removed your made up comment about your imaginary junior career i don’t really think that you should give any thought on who right or wrong. I was saying that list are made with preferencial thought and it was not science so it was normal then some have prospect higher and lower than other. But something must have spark in your head because you’re not getting it and Steve Kournianos doesnt write for sporting new he have is own platform. He is a legit prospect expert, like pronman who is very great at was he’s doiing but one thing sure he wouldn’t bashed on an prospect analyst because he know that its not science and that based on preferences some players are higher on their list. But i’m sure all the expert that made a living with hockey refers to you when it’s time to quote prospect and rank nhl farm system since you’ve play junior and you know better then everyone. The other opinion are all wrong since you think so

Still waiting for your hockey db stats buddy