SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

brock

Created by: ConorStainsby
Team: 2019-20 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 28, 2019
Published: Aug. 28, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$7,250,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Boeser, Brock [RFA Rights]
VAN
  1. Murray, Brett [Reserve List]
  2. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  3. Thompson, Tage
  4. 2020 1st round pick (BUF)
  5. 2021 2nd round pick (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. 2020 5th round pick (NYI)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$75,859,167$0$4,682,500$5,640,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$767,500$767,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 7
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,650,000$3,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,275,000$2,275,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,550,000$1,550,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,875,000$3,875,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,387,500$3,387,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,325,000$1,325,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,300,000$1,300,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$812,500$812,500
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 28, 2019 at 10:09 p.m.
#1
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
Isles don’t want Scandella
GMTD liked this.
Aug. 28, 2019 at 10:15 p.m.
#2
McFaksaGOAT
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 856
Vancouver declines. They’re gonna be pushing for the playoffs this year and will not be trading their 2nd best forward imo
Aug. 28, 2019 at 10:55 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Yark yark yark yark. It would start with sam reinhart and a better prospect then thompson
Aug. 28, 2019 at 11:04 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 197
Likes: 71
Quoting: Sebybbq
Yark yark yark yark. It would start with sam reinhart and a better prospect then thompson


FYI Reinhart has had better seasons on a worse team! VAN would have to add to Boeser to get Reinhart! Wow!!
GMTD liked this.
Aug. 28, 2019 at 11:19 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: melloni17
FYI Reinhart has had better seasons on a worse team! VAN would have to add to Boeser to get Reinhart! Wow!!


You know what make good team great? There players so stop whit that bullshat, its been 10 year that buffalo suck it’s not a reason.

And boeser add more goal then reinhart in 13 games less. So no statistically both where very similar he was on pace for 67 point on 82 games. Plus boeser doesn’t have eichel and skinner to give the puck to. He add around 25 assists and didn’t deserve any credit so calm down. Buffalo suck year after year because their players is bad.
Aug. 28, 2019 at 11:32 p.m.
#6
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: melloni17
FYI Reinhart has had better seasons on a worse team! VAN would have to add to Boeser to get Reinhart! Wow!!


My personal opinion is boeser>reinhart. I also think reinhart will want a kings ransom on his next deal.

Risto and Reinhart for Boeser. I think this deal would work out well for both sides.
Pharow liked this.
Aug. 28, 2019 at 11:33 p.m.
#7
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Also boeser’s ask is 7m x 4 years. So you would get a better deal out of it too.
Aug. 29, 2019 at 2:10 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Quoting: Sebybbq
You know what make good team great? There players so stop whit that bullshat, its been 10 year that buffalo suck it’s not a reason.

And boeser add more goal then reinhart in 13 games less. So no statistically both where very similar he was on pace for 67 point on 82 games. Plus boeser doesn’t have eichel and skinner to give the puck to. He add around 25 assists and didn’t deserve any credit so calm down. Buffalo suck year after year because their players is bad.


Someone is a little salty. I guess we can say Vancouver is just as bad and with the same **** players since they both have the same amount of cups.
And Reino deserves a lot of credit for his assists since he is their main possession driver. So you can whatever you want but in reality you wouldnt "start" a trade with someone that's basically equal value. That would your team bias saying my guy is better than yours cause he plays on my team and I watch him more
GMTD liked this.
Aug. 29, 2019 at 2:21 a.m.
#9
Sabres are elite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,991
Likes: 3,305
Quoting: Jamiepo
My personal opinion is boeser>reinhart. I also think reinhart will want a kings ransom on his next deal.

Risto and Reinhart for Boeser. I think this deal would work out well for both sides.


No, Reinhart signed a bridge to prove himself better beforr signing. If he proves hes a 8 mil-9mil player, Buffalo can give him that. Hardly a kings ransom for one of the smartest players in the game imo. Certainly not a Marner 12 mil request
melloni17, GMTD and AndrewLadd liked this.
Aug. 29, 2019 at 2:21 a.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
Someone is a little salty. I guess we can say Vancouver is just as bad and with the same **** players since they both have the same amount of cups.
And Reino deserves a lot of credit for his assists since he is their main possession driver. So you can whatever you want but in reality you wouldnt "start" a trade with someone that's basically equal value. That would your team bias saying my guy is better than yours cause he plays on my team and I watch him more


Is not my guys since a don’t give a shat of both these team. Both boeser as more value than reinhart. And this is very impartial because i saw both play. So calm down. I never said reinhart wasn’t good but the truth is if vancouver is trading boeser to buffalo is
Reinhart that will be goiing the other ways. Your a sabres fan your emotion blind you when its time to value your players
Aug. 29, 2019 at 11:28 a.m.
#11
Eichel Tower
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 4,716
Likes: 2,441
While one may disagree with the value of Ristolainen, IMO this is way too much for Boeser.
If one looks at other trades involving players with Boeser's capabilities the trade includes a prospect, first and more (either a roster player, lesser prospect or a 2nd)
I do not see any reason why VAN would trade Boeser, just as most Sabre fans automatically reject any trade involving Reinhart.
Edit: let me add, Ristolainen would be the top offensive defenseman for VAN. That may not be significant, but Ristolainen is a very good PP QB.
Quoting: Sebybbq
Yark yark yark yark. It would start with sam reinhart and a better prospect then thompson

Well Boeser may not have an Eichel but does have Pettersson and Horvat helping him to get assists and goal.
Trading Boeser for Reinhart makes no sense for either team, so let's agree not to include them in the same trade.
Quoting: melloni17
FYI Reinhart has had better seasons on a worse team! VAN would have to add to Boeser to get Reinhart! Wow!!

Probably the value of each is pretty close, I do not get to see, much of Boeser to know his style of play.
BTW this is a huge offer for Boeser, I m am bemused when I see so many people rejecting it,
Quoting: Jamiepo
My personal opinion is boeser>reinhart. I also think reinhart will want a kings ransom on his next deal.
Risto and Reinhart for Boeser. I think this deal would work out well for both sides.

TBH there is not a huge difference between Reinhart and Boeser, but even presuming Boeser is better, adding Ristolainen is way over kill.
Bostonbruins liked this.
Aug. 29, 2019 at 12:50 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: GMTD
While one may disagree with the value of Ristolainen, IMO this is way too much for Boeser.
If one looks at other trades involving players with Boeser's capabilities the trade includes a prospect, first and more (either a roster player, lesser prospect or a 2nd)
I do not see any reason why VAN would trade Boeser, just as most Sabre fans automatically reject any trade involving Reinhart.
Edit: let me add, Ristolainen would be the top offensive defenseman for VAN. That may not be significant, but Ristolainen is a very good PP QB.

Well Boeser may not have an Eichel but does have Pettersson and Horvat helping him to get assists and goal.
Trading Boeser for Reinhart makes no sense for either team, so let's agree not to include them in the same trade.

Probably the value of each is pretty close, I do not get to see, much of Boeser to know his style of play.
BTW this is a huge offer for Boeser, I m am bemused when I see so many people rejecting it,

TBH there is not a huge difference between Reinhart and Boeser, but even presuming Boeser is better, adding Ristolainen is way over kill.


No reinhart no trade. It’s simple like that. There no other players on buffalo team that could land you a boeser. Dahlin and eichel are untouchable. It’s reinhart or vancouver hang up the phone. Vancouver won’t trade a young forward who will be face of the franchise with petterson for a -40 defenceman and a suspect.
Aug. 29, 2019 at 12:51 p.m.
#13
Eichel Tower
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 4,716
Likes: 2,441
Quoting: Sebybbq
No reinhart no trade. It’s simple like that. There no other players on buffalo team that could land you a boeser. Dahlin and eichel are untouchable. It’s reinhart or vancouver hang up the phone. Vancouver won’t trade a young forward who will be face of the franchise with petterson for a -40 defenceman and a suspect.


I think I said that did I not?
Edit: I think i said that twice.
Bostonbruins liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll