SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Oil-Canes

Created by: KDK_1983
Team: 2019-20 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 6, 2019
Published: Sep. 6, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
EDM
  1. Faulk, Justin ($833,333 retained)
CAR
  1. Manning, Brandon
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Reserve List]
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (EDM)
  4. 2021 6th round pick (PIT)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2021
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$79,568,666$0$1,750,000$1,931,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,950,000$1,950,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,150,000$2,150,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,835,000$2,835,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,300,000$1,300,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,316,667$3,316,667
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
G
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,900,000$1,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$675,000$675,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,150,000$1,150,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 6, 2019 at 4:21 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
I think the idea is that Canes get rid of some D, not add to their D..........
Sep. 6, 2019 at 4:23 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
KDK_1983
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 54
Likes: 15
Manning is just a cap dump.....His cap hit is considerably less once sent down to the minors. I wouldn't expect Manning to play in the NHL.....especially for a team with defense as strong as Carolina's.
Sep. 6, 2019 at 4:26 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 181
Likes: 38
I like the idea of PoolParty for Faulk. Seems like it would make sense for both teams.

I would say this deal should be structured in a way that doesn’t require us to also give up Manning and additional assets to get rid of Manning. Giving up draft picks to get rid of him just hurts us longer term. He can be buried in the minors and the Oilers would save $1.1MM... then he’s off the books next year.

Maybe Pool Party plus a late pick is enough to get Faulk, with Carolina retaining sufficient cap to keep the Oilers compliant.

I also wouldn’t be against throwing Benning plus a pick into the trade for a younger winger with upside... would make room for Persson / Bouchard. Depending on how the team progresses and how Jones plays, Oilers could then move Russell at the deadline for a pick and let Jones finish the season with the big club.
Sep. 6, 2019 at 4:29 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
Quoting: newmy
I like the idea of PoolParty for Faulk. Seems like it would make sense for both teams.

I would say this deal should be structured in a way that doesn’t require us to also give up Manning and additional assets to get rid of Manning. Giving up draft picks to get rid of him just hurts us longer term. He can be buried in the minors and the Oilers would save $1.1MM... then he’s off the books next year.

Maybe Pool Party plus a late pick is enough to get Faulk, with Carolina retaining sufficient cap to keep the Oilers compliant.

I also wouldn’t be against throwing Benning plus a pick into the trade for a younger winger with upside... would make room for Persson / Bouchard. Depending on how the team progresses and how Jones plays, Oilers could then move Russell at the deadline for a pick and let Jones finish the season with the big club.


Yah sure, send 2 D to the Canes, just what they need, should make that 12 NHL D then.
Sep. 6, 2019 at 4:44 p.m.
#5
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,556
Likes: 12,309
Faulk has trade protection so highly likely Edmonton is on his no trade list, also why trade Pulujarvi and an early 2nd for a UFA, not good asset management.
Sep. 6, 2019 at 4:55 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 181
Likes: 38
Edited Sep. 6, 2019 at 5:06 p.m.
Quoting: Copenhagen
Yah sure, send 2 D to the Canes, just what they need, should make that 12 NHL D then.


I think it's funny when people like you try to be critical of others... but just show their stupidity in ways such as not being able to count... Well done, d u m b a s s.
Sep. 6, 2019 at 5:03 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,771
Likes: 7,649
I don't see Edmonton (a) adding a defenseman due to comments Holland has made previously, and (b) buying rentals.
Copenhagen liked this.
Sep. 6, 2019 at 5:07 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
Quoting: newmy
I think it's funny when people like you try to be critical of others... but just show their stupidity in ways such as not being able to count... Well done, d u m b a s s.


Exactly
Sep. 6, 2019 at 5:12 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
KDK_1983
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 54
Likes: 15
Edmonton had the 5th worst defence in the league last year and haven't done ANYTHING to address it. Regardless of what Holland says they NEED defence.....not to mention that I doubt Holland would ever go out and state that he was looking for D because it would (a) drive the price up and (b) show little support for his current players if no deal can be made.

Gardiner also hadn't signed in Carolina at the time those comments were made.
Sep. 6, 2019 at 5:13 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
KDK_1983
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 54
Likes: 15
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Faulk has trade protection so highly likely Edmonton is on his no trade list, also why trade Pulujarvi and an early 2nd for a UFA, not good asset management.


Faulk is in the last year of his deal and could get the opportunity to play on the powerplay with Connor McDavid and boost his value on his next deal.

Realistically, a 2nd round pick and Puljujarvi ISN'T poor asset management because of the number of 1-year contracts the Oilers already have this season. If they are out of the playoff picture come trade deadline, they could easily move someone (including Faulk) to a contender and recoup the pick if needed. Not to mention that the Oilers haven't exactly been experts in drafting in past years so a 2nd round pick isn't that valuable.

The Oilers NEED to acquire a bonafide NHL player for Puljujarvi.....anything less and the trade will be considered a loss. If acquiring said player means adding pick(s) to a Puljujarvi trade then I'm all in
Sep. 6, 2019 at 5:16 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
KDK_1983
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 54
Likes: 15
Quoting: CD282
I don't see Edmonton (a) adding a defenseman due to comments Holland has made previously, and (b) buying rentals.


All Holland has added this year are rentals?
Sep. 6, 2019 at 5:30 p.m.
#12
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,556
Likes: 12,309
Quoting: KDK_1983
Faulk is in the last year of his deal and could get the opportunity to play on the powerplay with Connor McDavid and boost his value on his next deal.

Realistically, a 2nd round pick and Puljujarvi ISN'T poor asset management because of the number of 1-year contracts the Oilers already have this season. If they are out of the playoff picture come trade deadline, they could easily move someone (including Faulk) to a contender and recoup the pick if needed. Not to mention that the Oilers haven't exactly been experts in drafting in past years so a 2nd round pick isn't that valuable.

The Oilers NEED to acquire a bonafide NHL player for Puljujarvi.....anything less and the trade will be considered a loss. If acquiring said player means adding pick(s) to a Puljujarvi trade then I'm all in


The players that the Oilers have on expiring deals won't fetch more then a 3rd at best, the Oilers
2020 2nd has a good chance of being pretty early in the 2nd which is pretty valuable to a team in Edmonton's position.

It'd be good if they could get a bonafide NHL player for Pulujarvi but it isn't likely given his current value and one without term is useless to a non playoff team which is likely what Edmonton is, yeah they could turn around and trade Faulk at the TDL but that's risky considering an injury could happen and then they've traded good assets for nothing.

This just isn't a good idea for Edmonton and in all reality Faulk likely has Edmonton on his no trade list and he probably isn't waiving to go to the Oilers.
CD282 liked this.
Sep. 6, 2019 at 6:13 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,771
Likes: 7,649
Quoting: KDK_1983
All Holland has added this year are rentals?


He didn't give up assets for them though. And anyway, my first point precludes this from happening.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll