SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canucks pay to dump on the Ducks

Created by: alwaysnextyear
Team: 2019-20 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 7, 2019
Published: Sep. 7, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The Canucks have too many forwards and could use some more cap space to maneuver the next couple years. Of the two main candidates to move, Sutter should be a lot cheaper to dump than Eriksson. To do it the Canucks target ANA for a few reasons;

1) The Ducks have gobs of cap space even before factoring in their LTIR guys.
2) They just hired Brandon's Uncle Darryl as a coaching advisor (I know, that doesn't mean ****).
3) They could really use another RHD.... enter Chris Tanev.

By upgrading a 2020 pick and sending Tanev to the Ducks at 50% retained, it may just be enough value to move Sutter's contract. If the Ducks still see themselves as a legitimate threat to make the playoffs adding Tanev could really help them, and if they're out of the race by the trade deadline then they can move Tanev and his half-price contract for a nice return.

For VAN to do this they have to have confidence that Gaudette can be their full-time 3C (I think he's already a better option than Sutter anyway) and that two of Benn, Juolevi, Fantenberg, Biega, Rafferty, Sautner, Teves, etc. can form a good 3rd pairing.
Trades
ANA
  1. Sutter, Brandon
  2. Tanev, Christopher ($2,225,000 retained)
  3. 2020 3rd round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Grant, Derek
  2. 2020 6th round pick (ANA)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$68,726,258$0$2,315,000$12,773,742
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$820,000$820,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,541,000$1,541,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,498,925$1,498,925
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,133,333$1,133,333
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,375,000$4,375,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 8
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,225,000$2,225,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000 (Performance Bonus$1,200,000$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 7, 2019 at 6:52 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,889
Likes: 8,877
Ducks decline. They have enough bad contracts already.
Sep. 7, 2019 at 7:32 p.m.
#2
Rangers 2023
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 19,043
Likes: 5,430
Quoting: Gofnut999
Ducks decline. They have enough bad contracts already.


Literally 1, and even then rico isnt THAT bad
Dan10900 and OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 7, 2019 at 7:34 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Gofnut999
Ducks decline. They have enough bad contracts already.


Even so, they have 1 guy to resign over the next two years, I see no reason why they shouldn't get Tanev and a pick for basically free (and they really don't, eaves and Kessler are LTIR, Getzlaf isn't too big for what he still brings and only 2 years Henrique's is probably a year or two too long, but aside from that there are plenty of teams that have worse contracts than those
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 7, 2019 at 7:39 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,889
Likes: 8,877
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Literally 1, and even then rico isnt THAT bad


Quoting: AFOX10900
Even so, they have 1 guy to resign over the next two years, I see no reason why they shouldn't get Tanev and a pick for basically free (and they really don't, eaves and Kessler are LTIR, Getzlaf isn't too big for what he still brings and only 2 years Henrique's is probably a year or two too long, but aside from that there are plenty of teams that have worse contracts than those


The only reason you can say that is because they don’t have cap issues. Just because they are not a problem does not mean they are not bad contracts.

Tanev is overated. Most metrics show him to be a 3rd pair to low end 2nd pair. There are better options.
Sep. 7, 2019 at 9:15 p.m.
#5
Rangers 2023
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 19,043
Likes: 5,430
Quoting: Gofnut999
The only reason you can say that is because they don’t have cap issues. Just because they are not a problem does not mean they are not bad contracts.

Tanev is overated. Most metrics show him to be a 3rd pair to low end 2nd pair. There are better options.


For 1 year it poses no risk
Sep. 7, 2019 at 9:21 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,889
Likes: 8,877
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
For 1 year it poses no risk


Not worth adding Sutter for another year. Or the eventual buyout when you can acquire better options for reasonable cost.
Sep. 7, 2019 at 10:19 p.m.
#7
Rangers 2023
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 19,043
Likes: 5,430
Quoting: Gofnut999
Not worth adding Sutter for another year. Or the eventual buyout when you can acquire better options for reasonable cost.


For sure
Sep. 8, 2019 at 1:37 a.m.
#8
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,422
Likes: 2,903
Question, would you rather have Tanev for one season and a 3rd round pick or cap space to possibly go after one of the bigger UFAs next offseason? Yes the ducks have cap space but with Perry’s cap hit going up $4M next season and adding $4+M in Sutter that going to make it hard to add anyone of significance for next season which should be a big season deciding if the next group becomes legit cup contenders or not.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 8, 2019 at 6:03 a.m.
#9
Quack Quack Quack
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 114
Likes: 59
Edited Sep. 8, 2019 at 7:37 a.m.
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
For 1 year it poses no risk


Sure, but it also offers very little benefit. I'm still looking at this trade and asking "What's in it for us?"

As I see it:
1) Replacing Grant with Sutter on the 4th line = minor upgrade
2) Replacing Larsson/Hakanpaa with Tanev on the 3rd pair RD = minor upgrade
3) Replacing our 6th round pick with a 3rd = minor upgrade

I mean, I guess there is no downside but...helping out a division rival while getting nothing significant in return kinda leaves a bad taste in my mouth...hem, haw, hem, haw...Okay, fine, make it a 2nd round pick and I'm on board
Sep. 8, 2019 at 9:25 a.m.
#10
Rangers 2023
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 19,043
Likes: 5,430
Quoting: OrangeMallard
Sure, but it also offers very little benefit. I'm still looking at this trade and asking "What's in it for us?"

As I see it:
1) Replacing Grant with Sutter on the 4th line = minor upgrade
2) Replacing Larsson/Hakanpaa with Tanev on the 3rd pair RD = minor upgrade
3) Replacing our 6th round pick with a 3rd = minor upgrade

I mean, I guess there is no downside but...helping out a division rival while getting nothing significant in return kinda leaves a bad taste in my mouth...hem, haw, hem, haw...Okay, fine, make it a 2nd round pick and I'm on board


Never said it did tbh
OrangeMallard liked this.
Sep. 8, 2019 at 6:12 p.m.
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,877
Likes: 25,688
To be honest, I'd rather pay the extra $100,000 and have Stecher rather than Tanev. Then I would upgrade from a 6th to a 4th or maybe add a prospect.
Sep. 8, 2019 at 6:54 p.m.
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,877
Likes: 25,688
Quoting: Jah1722
Question, would you rather have Tanev for one season and a 3rd round pick or cap space to possibly go after one of the bigger UFAs next offseason? Yes the ducks have cap space but with Perry’s cap hit going up $4M next season and adding $4+M in Sutter that going to make it hard to add anyone of significance for next season which should be a big season deciding if the next group becomes legit cup contenders or not.


By the simple expedient of not re-signing Devin Shore, the Ducks should have about $7MM for a free-agent RD next summer even with having to re-up Terry, Sherwood, Guhle and Larsson. And Sutter instead of Shore might not be such a terrible step down. I wonder how Vancouver values Stecher vs. Tanev.
Sep. 8, 2019 at 9:31 p.m.
#13
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,422
Likes: 2,903
Quoting: OldNYIfan
By the simple expedient of not re-signing Devin Shore, the Ducks should have about $7MM for a free-agent RD next summer even with having to re-up Terry, Sherwood, Guhle and Larsson. And Sutter instead of Shore might not be such a terrible step down. I wonder how Vancouver values Stecher vs. Tanev.


By my math the ducks will have roughly $11M in cap space to re-sign their RFAs, fill the back up G position and replace the scratches. Yes some of those can be filled from within with ELCs but you’ll have to add those cap hits. There’s not nearly as much cap left bringing in Sutter and really hinders the chances of being able to sign a top UFA.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 5:26 p.m.
#14
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,877
Likes: 25,688
Quoting: Jah1722
By my math the ducks will have roughly $11M in cap space to re-sign their RFAs, fill the back up G position and replace the scratches. Yes some of those can be filled from within with ELCs but you’ll have to add those cap hits. There’s not nearly as much cap left bringing in Sutter and really hinders the chances of being able to sign a top UFA.


I've done two simulations. One assumes Sutter and Stecher (re-upped at $4.75MM) also allows Dylan Demelo to be signed at $3.5MM. This requires allowing Shore to walk. The other involves Sutter and Tanev, who is allowed to walk, and then Jared Spurgeon (or someone similar) can be signed for $7MM or Demelo for $4MM; in this scenario, Shore is re-signed at $2.75MM.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll