SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Faulk to ANAHEIM

Created by: Caniac2000
Team: 2019-20 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 9, 2019
Published: Sep. 9, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I know I know it's an overpayment so please let me know what you'd do from an Anaheim perspective
Trades
CAR
  1. Groulx, Benoit-Olivier [Reserve List]
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (ANA)
  3. 2021 4th round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
2nd becomes a 1st if Faulk resigns
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the TOR
2021
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
2022
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,221,458$0$3,207,500$3,278,542
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,454,000$8,454,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,750,000$2,750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$746,667$746,667 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$725,000$725,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,125,000$3,125,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$874,125$874,125
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,300,000$2,300,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 9, 2019 at 1:36 p.m.
#1
? San Jose Sharks ?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 282
Not a 2020 first.

2 2nds

2020 2nd

And 2021 2nd
Sep. 9, 2019 at 1:37 p.m.
#2
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,319
Likes: 3,331
I don't think that's to much of an overpayment, probably iright around there in value
Sep. 9, 2019 at 1:39 p.m.
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,479
Likes: 22,655
I don't see why the probable out of the playoff Ducks would trade for a one year rental.
Ccc liked this.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 1:47 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: palhal
I don't see why the probable out of the playoff Ducks would trade for a one year rental.


They want to extend him......
Sep. 9, 2019 at 1:56 p.m.
#5
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3,601
An extended, established RHD who just came off his best defensive season in his career is pretty valuable IMO. Don’t be shocked if Rakell or Kase is the return here.

I good Right shot forward for a good right shot defenseman is a good ‘hockey deal’ for both sides.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 1:57 p.m.
#6
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,061
Quoting: Ccc
Not a 2020 first.

2 2nds

2020 2nd

And 2021 2nd


This. Carolina trading Faulk is a lot like the Predators trading Subban to clear cap space. I can't imagine them getting a 1st given the lack of leverage the Canes have.
Ccc liked this.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:04 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: JayTea
This. Carolina trading Faulk is a lot like the Predators trading Subban to clear cap space. I can't imagine them getting a 1st given the lack of leverage the Canes have.


What lack of leverage? When the canes move down who needs to go down, they're under the cap. They have no need to move him. Carolina have as much leverage here as Anaheim, Anaheim have a need, Carolina have a surplus
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:08 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Quoting: Caniac555
An extended, established RHD who just came off his best defensive season in his career is pretty valuable IMO. Don’t be shocked if Rakell or Kase is the return here.

I good Right shot forward for a good right shot defenseman is a good ‘hockey deal’ for both sides.


Carolina doesn't have the cap space to take on roster player. This will end up being a prospect + pick(s) trade regardless of destination team. ANA has the assets to make a decent return offer and a need to fill a defensive hole so they are motivated. If the kids step up as expected and Faulk plugs the hole, their team can easily get back into playoff form this season and justify Faulk signing an extension.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:11 p.m.
#9
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3,601
When you subtract out $4.8M with Faulk, and make the necessary roster adjustments, they are perfectly fine on cap space to take on up to about $4M. Interesting - Kase and Rakell are both under that number

Quoting: Ghorman
Carolina doesn't have the cap space to take on roster player. This will end up being a prospect + pick(s) trade regardless of destination team. ANA has the assets to make a decent return offer and a need to fill a defensive hole so they are motivated. If the kids step up as expected and Faulk plugs the hole, their team can easily get back into playoff form this season and justify Faulk signing an extension.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:17 p.m.
#10
? San Jose Sharks ?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 282
Edited Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:32 p.m.. Reason: Fixed quotes
Quoting: Caniac2000
What lack of leverage? When the canes move down who needs to go down, they're under the cap. They have no need to move him. Carolina have as much leverage here as Anaheim, Anaheim have a need, Carolina have a surplus


Anaheim doesn’t NEED, Faulk. They have quite a strong youth core. Faulk is a want, it’d be nice if they can extend him but Kase or Rakell is NOT GOING ON THE OTHER WAY. Lmfao. Kase is 2 cap hit and Rakell is just under 4. Both are top 6, with easy cases to be a top 3 player. Kase is he can fit in 82 games and improve on His last campaign; will absolutely sky rocket in value. Rakell is a solid player. Anaheim should keep both as they bring more value to their team than Faulk, and could be traded for more than Faulk.

Carolina can keep Faulk and trade him at TDL if they’d like a better return. If Anaheim loses a 2020 first or Kase or rakell for Faulk their gm needs to be fired.
awatt and Ducksfan93 liked this.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:25 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 910
Likes: 208
Quoting: Ccc
Anaheim doesn’t NEED, Faulk. They have quite a strong youth core. Faulk is a want, it’d be nice if they can extend him but Kase or Rakell is NOT GOING ON THE OTHER WAY. Lmfao. Kase is 2 cap hit and Rakell is just under 4. Both are top 6, with easy cases to be a top 3 player. Kase is he can fit in 82 games and improve on His last campaign; will absolutely sky rocket in value. Rakell is a solid player. Anaheim should keep both as they bring more value to their team than Faulk, and could be traded for more than Faulk.

Carolina can keep Faulk and trade him at TDL if they’d like a better return. If Anaheim loses a 2020 first or Kase or rakell for Faulk their gm needs to be fired.


Thank you for saying that!!!!

GMBM will be having pitchforks at his front door if we lose either 3 of those.
Ccc and Ducksfan93 liked this.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:39 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 307
Likes: 64
Quoting: Ccc
Anaheim doesn’t NEED, Faulk. They have quite a strong youth core. Faulk is a want, it’d be nice if they can extend him but Kase or Rakell is NOT GOING ON THE OTHER WAY. Lmfao. Kase is 2 cap hit and Rakell is just under 4. Both are top 6, with easy cases to be a top 3 player. Kase is he can fit in 82 games and improve on His last campaign; will absolutely sky rocket in value. Rakell is a solid player. Anaheim should keep both as they bring more value to their team than Faulk, and could be traded for more than Faulk.

Carolina can keep Faulk and trade him at TDL if they’d like a better return. If Anaheim loses a 2020 first or Kase or rakell for Faulk their gm needs to be fired.


Spot on here. If the Ducks were going to trade Rakell, it would be for Laine. And we know that wont happen. Wpg wont trade Laine to the west unless they get a Rakell, young D and a 1st .
awatt liked this.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:44 p.m.
#13
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,061
Quoting: Caniac2000
What lack of leverage? When the canes move down who needs to go down, they're under the cap. They have no need to move him. Carolina have as much leverage here as Anaheim, Anaheim have a need, Carolina have a surplus


So they move down a couple players they risk losing to waivers for a guy who will walk at the end of the year anyhow? Maybe, but that definitely puts a little more of a sense of urgency to move a player they don't need and preserve their depth.

Real question because I'm not familiar with the Canes depth players. Who gets sent down?
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:46 p.m.
#14
? San Jose Sharks ?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 282
Quoting: Ducksfan93
Spot on here. If the Ducks were going to trade Rakell, it would be for Laine. And we know that wont happen. Wpg wont trade Laine to the west unless they get a Rakell, young D and a 1st .


Kase or Rakell (whoever jets prefer)(most likely rakell)
Max Jones
Josh Manson
2020 1st
2021 3rd

Idk it seems like a lot but idk if Winnipeg takes less

Or scratch max jones and still offer could be a lot lmao
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:46 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: JayTea
So they move down a couple players they risk losing to waivers for a guy who will walk at the end of the year anyhow? Maybe, but that definitely puts a little more of a sense of urgency to move a player they don't need and preserve their depth.

Real question because I'm not familiar with the Canes depth players. Who gets sent down?


No, they move a guy who's waiver exempt in Clark Bishop, maybe Necas who's also waiver exempt and Forsling, who's a D man and never gonna see the light of Day in Carolina anyway
JayTea liked this.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:49 p.m.
#16
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,061
Quoting: Caniac2000
No, they move a guy who's waiver exempt in Clark Bishop, maybe Necas who's also waiver exempt and Forsling, who's a D man and never gonna see the light of Day in Carolina anyway


Unless this site is wrong, neither Forsling or Bishop are waivers exempt.
Sep. 9, 2019 at 2:51 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: JayTea
Unless this site is wrong, neither Forsling or Bishop are waivers exempt.


Bishop is waiver exempt, Forsling isn't
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll