Quoting: oneX
Marner doesn't get a say in where he gets traded. And the thing about being traded means...he loses the team comparables argument in contract negotiations with any new team.
Mitch, Paul, Dreger, and Ferris are probably the only hockey people out there that actually think Marner = AM. No one really buys that bs.
You are right, though, onex. He doesn't get a say in where he gets traded to. But I can't see another team trading for an unsigned Marner and dealing with the leafs problem child. He would need to be signed, and apparently Mitchy Rich only wants the AM deal.
So, the question for me becomes what would a team trade for the privilege of an overpaid Marner? Not near as much as we're being lead to believe, is my guess. I mean, what happened to all those OSs Dreger promised us? The Marner's camp narrative is mostly manufactured nonsense, imo.
I could actually see Mitch's ego pricing him out of the NHL this year. I really don't think anyones thinks he's worth what he's demanding. And it might take Mitch, Paul and co. a year playing in Europe to come to terms with reality. And for what??
Im starting to find the delusions from Marner's camp actually funny to watch, as the narrative and the public begin to turn against him.. and they did this all to themselves. Smh.