Forums/NHL Signings

Vancouver Canucks signed Brock Boeser (3 Years / $5,875,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options

 

Sep 16 at 9:18
#1
Brock Boeser has signed a new contract with the Vancouver Canucks.
STANDARD CONTRACT
COMPARE THIS CONTRACT
LENGTH: 3 YEARS
EXPIRY STATUS: RFA
SIGNING TEAM: Vancouver CanucksVancouver Canucks
VALUE: $17,625,000
C.H.% : 7.21
SIGNING DATE: September 16, 2019
SOURCE: CapFriendly
SEASONCLAUSECAP HIT AAV P. BONUSES S. BONUSES BASE SALARY TOTAL SALARY MINORS SALARY
2019-20$5,875,000$5,875,000$0$3,300,000$700,000$4,000,000$4,000,000
2020-21$5,875,000$5,875,000$0$3,000,000$3,125,000$6,125,000$6,125,000
2021-22$5,875,000$5,875,000$0$0$7,500,000$7,500,000$7,500,000
TOTAL$17,625,000$17,625,000$0$6,300,000$11,325,000$17,625,000$17,625,000
Sep 16 at 9:21
#2
GenericUsername489
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 166
Likes: 51
Really good price for 3 years holy crap.
SpaghettiPasta, MoreOfAnIslesGuy, BurgerBoss and 5 others liked this.
Sep 16 at 9:21
#3
I just need sauce
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 819
Wow that's good.
Sep 16 at 9:22
#4
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 62
Likes: 11
This is a solid deal for Vancouver. Very favorable.
Sep 16 at 9:23
#5
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 844
Another contract like McAvoy's last year is 7.5 Million so that's what the tendered offer will be to quality him.

I don't understand why Vancouver would do a bridge though, they aren't contending. Might as well lock him up early so it's a favorable contract when they are contending.
The_Madhawk, Brian2016, BOLTLOVER1 and 3 others liked this.
Sep 16 at 9:24
#6
Tspky
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 594
Wow and the qualifying offer will be at most 7.5-7.6 (50% rule)
Sep 16 at 9:24
#7
The evil stats guy
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 4,187
Likes: 1,751
The AAV is fine although i am not a huge fan of the last year salary bit. I think he plays up to that either way.


Can I just say how ****ing inflated everything is when this massive bridge is considered a good deal?
RawDeal liked this.
Sep 16 at 9:27
#8
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 106
Likes: 114
Solid deal for the canucks.
But they seem to be over the cap now, unless i'm missing something?
Sep 16 at 9:28
#9
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 844
I would rather him be locked up at 6 or 7 years at 7.5 Million, Vancouver ****ed themselves up by signing veteran's to higher contracts and now are going to pay long term for it.
BlueSeeker liked this.
Sep 16 at 9:32
#10
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 159
Likes: 297
Not bad. After seeing the AAV I definitely thought it would only be for one or two years.
Sep 16 at 9:33
#11
bhavikp27
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 537
Quoting: HabsForEver
Another contract like McAvoy's last year is 7.5 Million so that's what the tendered offer will be to quality him.

I don't understand why Vancouver would do a bridge though, they aren't contending. Might as well lock him up early so it's a favorable contract when they are contending.


they don't have the cap space for (signing him to an LT deal)

just like McAvoy and the Bruins otherwise it would have been a long-term deal
Sep 16 at 9:34
#12
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 28,378
Likes: 6,487
So many teams even poor teams are at the cap that they can't afford to long term deals. Is Myers at 6m and Elder at 6.5m really needed if it prevents signing Boesner long term (yes I realize Boesner might have wanted just a bridge).
Sep 16 at 9:35
#13
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 254
Likes: 157
With the trend of low AAVs with a high QOs on these bridge deals, it's gonna be really interesting to see the negotiations and contract amounts given when these contracts are up.
RawDeal liked this.
Sep 16 at 9:38
#14
Formerly klondikebar
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 1,460
So the Marner signing apparently started a chain of crazy good deals
Sep 16 at 9:48
#15
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,123
Likes: 559
Wow, i was 225k off :/
Sep 16 at 9:52
#16
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 98
Likes: 89
This HAS to set the market for the remaining RFA’s now. For example for the Jets there’s no way Laine or Connor can get more then 6 million a year tops for a 2-3 year bridge deal
Sep 16 at 9:53
#17
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 72
Likes: 13
Bang on 100,000 per point, 55 point player 5.5M
Sep 16 at 9:55
#18
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 835
Likes: 303
Quoting: Karimizo
Solid deal for the canucks.
But they seem to be over the cap now, unless i'm missing something?


Just need to bury 3 overpaid bums like Lazi Loui and Sutter in the minor. They have a 26 man roster right now.
Sep 16 at 9:57
#19
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 72
Likes: 13
Like Mitch 94 points, 10.893M oh wait...... bad math
Auston should have been 10.5 for 2 injury plagued seasons
Mitch should have been 9.5....Tavares has helped over pay his wingers, there are several
that croaked without him
And WNylander should have been 6.25
Sep 16 at 10:03
#20
saphi
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 77
Likes: 24
Quoting: Karimizo
Solid deal for the canucks.
But they seem to be over the cap now, unless i'm missing something?


Pretty sure Loui is in the minors.
Sep 16 at 10:37
#21
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 700
Poor contract for VAN. They needed to lock him up for 8 years before he explodes for 40+G...especially on a line w/ Pettersson. This 3 year bridge will haunt them down the road.
Sep 16 at 11:16
#22
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 45
Likes: 18
Solid signing and the length seems to work for both the team and the player.The contract will expire at the same time as Eriksson's contract will be off the books (baring a buyout), Luongo's recapture will be over, and the new TV deal and the addition of Seattle should see the cap jump. The only concern will be Petterssons and Hughes deals in the year prior to those falling off the books.

Add to that that the salary in the last year guarantees him at least 7.5M in the year following the contracts expiry.
Sep 16 at 11:30
#23
BtZ's buttercup
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 1,406
Cant believe he signed that low, good job.
Sep 16 at 11:57
#24
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,287
Likes: 1,473
So much for the "TML just screwed over every other team with Marner's contract" theory.
Sep 17 at 12:10
#25
J.L.
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 183
Likes: 65
Quoting: bhavikp27
they don't have the cap space for (signing him to an LT deal)

just like McAvoy and the Bruins otherwise it would have been a long-term deal


Yeah, they would have needed more than 7,5 to buy his ufa years.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit