SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Vancouver Canucks signed Brock Boeser (3 Years / $5,875,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:18 p.m.
#1
Brock Boeser has signed a new contract with the Vancouver Canucks.
Standard Contract
Comparable ContractsCOMPARE THIS CONTRACT
SIGNED BY: Jim Benning
Length: 3 years
Value: $17,625,000
Expiry Status: RFA (Arb)
Cap % Tooltip: 7.21
Signing Team: Logo of the Vancouver CanucksVancouver Canucks
Signing Date: Sep. 16, 2019
Source: CapFriendly

Brock Boeser signed a 3 year, $17,625,000 contract with the Vancouver Canucks on Sep. 16, 2019. The contract has a cap hit of $5,875,000.

SEASONClauseCap HitTooltipAAV TooltipP. BonusesTooltipS. BonusesTooltipBase SalaryTooltipTotal SalaryTooltipMinors SalTooltip
2019-20$5,875,000$5,875,000$0$3,300,000$700,000$4,000,000$4,000,000
2020-21$5,875,000$5,875,000$0$3,000,000$3,125,000$6,125,000$6,125,000
2021-22$5,875,000$5,875,000$0$0$7,500,000$7,500,000$7,500,000
TOTAL$17,625,000$17,625,000$0$6,300,000$11,325,000$17,625,000$17,625,000
Qualifying OfferTooltip: $7,500,000
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:21 p.m.
#2
GenericUsername489
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 637
Likes: 259
Really good price for 3 years holy crap.
SpaghettiPasta, MoreOfAnIslesGuy, justaBoss and 6 others liked this.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:21 p.m.
#3
i hope ur hungry now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 978
Wow that's good.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:22 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 76
Likes: 13
This is a solid deal for Vancouver. Very favorable.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:23 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 6,103
Likes: 2,240
Another contract like McAvoy's last year is 7.5 Million so that's what the tendered offer will be to quality him.

I don't understand why Vancouver would do a bridge though, they aren't contending. Might as well lock him up early so it's a favorable contract when they are contending.
The_Madhawk, Brian2016, BOLTLOVER1 and 3 others liked this.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:24 p.m.
#6
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,883
Likes: 980
Wow and the qualifying offer will be at most 7.5-7.6 (50% rule)
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:24 p.m.
#7
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,193
Likes: 5,554
The AAV is fine although i am not a huge fan of the last year salary bit. I think he plays up to that either way.


Can I just say how ****ing inflated everything is when this massive bridge is considered a good deal?
RawDeal liked this.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:27 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 125
Likes: 145
Solid deal for the canucks.
But they seem to be over the cap now, unless i'm missing something?
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:28 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 6,103
Likes: 2,240
I would rather him be locked up at 6 or 7 years at 7.5 Million, Vancouver ****ed themselves up by signing veteran's to higher contracts and now are going to pay long term for it.
BlueSeeker liked this.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:32 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 198
Likes: 500
Not bad. After seeing the AAV I definitely thought it would only be for one or two years.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:33 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,565
Likes: 5,450
Quoting: HabsForEver
Another contract like McAvoy's last year is 7.5 Million so that's what the tendered offer will be to quality him.

I don't understand why Vancouver would do a bridge though, they aren't contending. Might as well lock him up early so it's a favorable contract when they are contending.


they don't have the cap space for (signing him to an LT deal)

just like McAvoy and the Bruins otherwise it would have been a long-term deal
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:34 p.m.
#12
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,065
Likes: 22,463
So many teams even poor teams are at the cap that they can't afford to long term deals. Is Myers at 6m and Elder at 6.5m really needed if it prevents signing Boesner long term (yes I realize Boesner might have wanted just a bridge).
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:35 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 392
Likes: 286
With the trend of low AAVs with a high QOs on these bridge deals, it's gonna be really interesting to see the negotiations and contract amounts given when these contracts are up.
RawDeal liked this.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:38 p.m.
#14
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
So the Marner signing apparently started a chain of crazy good deals
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:48 p.m.
#15
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,721
Likes: 2,805
Wow, i was 225k off :/
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:52 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 174
Likes: 182
This HAS to set the market for the remaining RFA’s now. For example for the Jets there’s no way Laine or Connor can get more then 6 million a year tops for a 2-3 year bridge deal
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:53 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 18
Bang on 100,000 per point, 55 point player 5.5M
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:55 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 902
Likes: 347
Quoting: Karimizo
Solid deal for the canucks.
But they seem to be over the cap now, unless i'm missing something?


Just need to bury 3 overpaid bums like Lazi Loui and Sutter in the minor. They have a 26 man roster right now.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 9:57 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 18
Like Mitch 94 points, 10.893M oh wait...... bad math
Auston should have been 10.5 for 2 injury plagued seasons
Mitch should have been 9.5....Tavares has helped over pay his wingers, there are several
that croaked without him
And WNylander should have been 6.25
Sep. 16, 2019 at 10:03 p.m.
#20
nucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 342
Likes: 126
Quoting: Karimizo
Solid deal for the canucks.
But they seem to be over the cap now, unless i'm missing something?


Pretty sure Loui is in the minors.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 10:37 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 5,012
Likes: 3,523
Poor contract for VAN. They needed to lock him up for 8 years before he explodes for 40+G...especially on a line w/ Pettersson. This 3 year bridge will haunt them down the road.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 11:16 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 49
Likes: 20
Solid signing and the length seems to work for both the team and the player.The contract will expire at the same time as Eriksson's contract will be off the books (baring a buyout), Luongo's recapture will be over, and the new TV deal and the addition of Seattle should see the cap jump. The only concern will be Petterssons and Hughes deals in the year prior to those falling off the books.

Add to that that the salary in the last year guarantees him at least 7.5M in the year following the contracts expiry.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 11:30 p.m.
#23
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,036
Likes: 3,744
Cant believe he signed that low, good job.
Sep. 16, 2019 at 11:57 p.m.
#24
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
So much for the "TML just screwed over every other team with Marner's contract" theory.
Sep. 17, 2019 at 12:10 a.m.
#25
J.L.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 183
Likes: 66
Quoting: bhavikp27
they don't have the cap space for (signing him to an LT deal)

just like McAvoy and the Bruins otherwise it would have been a long-term deal


Yeah, they would have needed more than 7,5 to buy his ufa years.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit