Forums/NHL Signings

St. Louis Blues signed Justin Faulk (7 Years / $6,500,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options

 

Sep 24, 2019 at 3:12
#26
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 408
Likes: 176
Edited Sep 24, 2019 at 5:31
1-2 years too long and 0.5-1M AAV too much but that seems to be the case with these UFA deals. This is more of a replacement for Parayko on the second pair, who will move up when the Blues (likely now) let Pietrangelo test free agency. If I'm the Blues I would have rather looked to keep Pietrangelo around by simply moving Edmundson for futures (or letting him go as a UFA) and offering the 9.6M in budgeted cap space that the same two players used this season plus some of the cap inflation to get Pietrangelo under contract long term.
Sep 24, 2019 at 3:32
#27
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 10,004
Likes: 2,643
The money is about right, but the term is at least 2 years too long. Paying this guy until he's 35 probably won't end well.
Sep 24, 2019 at 3:43
#28
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 902
Was this deal better or worse than the Spergeon contract?
Sep 24, 2019 at 3:44
#29
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 902
Seabrook 2.0
weirfanno1 liked this.
Sep 24, 2019 at 3:53
#30
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 69
Likes: 50
Quoting: Brian2016
Was this deal better or worse than the Spergeon contract?


This is a terrible deal. Spurgeon's contract is good.
Brian2016 liked this.
Sep 24, 2019 at 4:19
#31
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 31,964
Likes: 8,201
Blues have 16m to sign 7 players including RFA Dunn and if they want two UFAs Schenn and Pietrangelo. So either way the Blues will getting rid of big cap players that currently on the roster.
The trade and signing. It was a pro active by the Blues to solidify their roster for next year. Yeah, I don't like the term that much.
Trickster liked this.
Sep 24, 2019 at 4:24
#32
Good Stick Lehky
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 5,314
Likes: 2,138
If you’re a Blues fan, you have to hope this doesn’t mean the end of Pietrangelo in STL.
weirfanno1 liked this.
Sep 24, 2019 at 4:25
#33
Good Stick Lehky
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 5,314
Likes: 2,138
Quoting: Brian2016
Seabrook 2.0


Possibly, but I actually think Faulk will age worse than Seabrook.
Sep 24, 2019 at 4:38
#34
Tom Wilson of ACGM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,611
Likes: 1,577
This team is going to tank after this season. Losing Pietrangelo, Schenn, maybe Bo.
Sep 24, 2019 at 4:49
#35
Jarmo Kekäläinen
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 394
Likes: 126
Quoting: Jetman
Their captain is gone as of July...I guess


Toronto.
Sep 24, 2019 at 5:06
#36
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 289
Likes: 181
This stinks of buyout before Year 6, maybe even sooner. As others have said, this makes signing Pietrangelo a virtual impossibility, which is odd as by almost all measures he’s a better all around D-Man than Faulk.

Dom Luszczyszyn’s player rankings in the Athletic - where he looks at the total value of each player, gives Faulk a 0.8 or “2nd Pair” (vs a 0.2 for Edmundson or “3rd Pair”) but Pietrangelo is a 2.2 or “Elite” putting him amongst the top-20 D-Men in the NhL!

So they go ahead and win the trade (or at least break even when you consider the addition of Bokk and the upgraded draft pick) but then go ahead an massively lose in signing this extension.
Sep 24, 2019 at 5:09
#37
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 289
Likes: 181
Quoting: CN10
1-2 years too long and 0.5-1M AAV too much but that seems to be the case with these UFA deals. This is more of a replacement for Parayko on the second pair, who will move up when the Blues (likely now) let Pietrangelo test free agency. If I'm the Blues I'd rather look to keep Pietrangelo around by simply moving Edmundson for futures (or letting him go as a UFA) though.


Unfortunately Edmundson was already moved this afternoon. In the Faulk trade. ?
Sep 24, 2019 at 5:25
#38
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 408
Likes: 176
Edited Sep 24, 2019 at 5:32
Quoting: rebecca
Unfortunately Edmundson was already moved this afternoon. In the Faulk trade. ?


What I meant in that post is trade Edmundson for futures or minimal cap space back instead of getting Faulk, and re-sign Pietrangelo using the budget of Pietrangelo + Edmundson (9.6M), but evidently the wording was unclear so I've edited that post.
rebecca liked this.
Sep 24, 2019 at 5:40
#39
Hugh Hefner of CF
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,646
Likes: 2,818
Too much term, not surprised at money though.
oneX liked this.
Sep 24, 2019 at 5:58
#40
habs_fan
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 592
and i thought the trade was bad...
Sep 24, 2019 at 8:40
#41
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 902
Quoting: Radovan
This is a terrible deal. Spurgeon's contract is good.


I agree. And I also think CAR won this trade hands down. Faulk is a PP specialist behind Hamilton. And they weren't gonna re-sign him anyway.
Sep 24, 2019 at 9:37
#42
GoJetsGo
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 521
Likes: 137
Wow that's a lot for a number four guy...
Sep 24, 2019 at 9:57
#43
No regretzkys
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 412
Likes: 176
Quoting: Random2152
Thankfully Burke is not incharge (and we can't really). I doubt he'd come to Toronto for a similar deal to what he has now but on a 3 year deal. Not likely at all.


Honestly Leafs could afford to offer him 10x5. I would do that
Sep 24, 2019 at 11:33
#44
J.L.
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 183
Likes: 65
What makes Faulk so bad?
Hockeyplayer1 liked this.
Sep 25, 2019 at 12:32
#45
Discord COL's GM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,281
Likes: 1,970
https://youtu.be/HCUu5ARAQzA as per Doug Armstrong first 5 years are No trade Clause Years then a M-NTC 15 Team No Trade List after @Banks @Jarvis
Sep 25, 2019 at 3:29
#46
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 69
Likes: 50
Quoting: JonJon
What makes Faulk so bad?


He's not bad, but seems to be quite overrated. A decent powerplay option, but at 5v5, he's a second pairing defenseman at best.
Sep 25, 2019 at 11:52
#47
J.L.
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 183
Likes: 65
Quoting: Radovan
He's not bad, but seems to be quite overrated. A decent powerplay option, but at 5v5, he's a second pairing defenseman at best.


When you use this site's compare option I can't help but notice that points per game per career seems to be what they look at. Faulk's numbers are in line with those players who have put up similar numbers.
Sep 25, 2019 at 12:19
#48
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 11
Likes: 1
Parayko, Pietrangelo, Gunnarsson, Bouwmeester, Bortuzzo, Dunn. That’s a good defense on its own. And now Faulk? Seems suspicious...
Sep 25, 2019 at 12:38
#49
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 166
Likes: 121
This extension is a whole lot of yuck. I mean I guess it's ok to have a back up plan if Pietrangelo leaves, but that is a pretty big downgrade, and if he leaves, wouldn't have younger cheaper talent be better than replacing him with a player that is probably going to start an immediate and steep decline.

Carolina looks amazing here. Gardiner has been a better D than Faulk in recent years, and would actually fit Carolina or St. Louis better. For Carolina to get Gardiner signed for a value deal without a lot of term, then turn Faulk into an asset, they actually come out of it with a better built blueline with more certainty and an extra prospect. Wadell has been killing it this summer.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit