SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

CAR fans what do you think READ DESCRIPTION

Created by: ItsBlowTime
Team: 2019-20 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 24, 2019
Published: Sep. 24, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
PLEASE READ

This would be a mid-season deal, and is based on a couple of things:

First, Markström continues his exceptional play from last season.

Second, Demko takes the next step and can handle being starter.

Third, Canes are in a legitimate playoff spot.

MArkstrom would be a definite upgrade in goal for a team looking to match for surpass their progress from last season. Would this make sense for them?

IT would also A: replenish the Canucks first round selection they traded away for Miller and B: give some cap room for when Pettersson, Hughes, and Demko all need new contracts at the same time.
Trades
VAN
  1. 2020 1st round pick (CAR)
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$73,951,878$0$3,700,000$7,548,122
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,366,666$3,366,666
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,375,000$4,375,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$975,000$975,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,325,000$2,325,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$900,000$900,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 24, 2019 at 5:46 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,919
Likes: 19,294
This also assumes Mrazek doesnt continue to play at the level he did?
Sep. 24, 2019 at 5:48 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 948
Clear No.

1.) we don't have the cap space
2.) Car doesn't give up a first for a player that only upgrades a back up role
palhal liked this.
Sep. 24, 2019 at 5:55 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 653
Likes: 185
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
This also assumes Mrazek doesnt continue to play at the level he did?


Quoting: Shifttee
Clear No.

1.) we don't have the cap space
2.) Car doesn't give up a first for a player that only upgrades a back up role


Cute you guys think Mrazek was better than Markstrom last season
Sep. 24, 2019 at 6:02 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 6,101
Quoting: ItsBlowTime
Cute you guys think Mrazek was better than Markstrom last season


Mrazek - 2.39GAA, .914 SV%, 57.5 Win %
Markstrom - 2.77 GAA, .912 SV%, 46.67 Win %

What am I missing?
GMTD liked this.
Sep. 24, 2019 at 6:03 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,197
Likes: 5,207
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Mrazek - 2.39GAA, .914 SV%, 57.5 Win %
Markstrom - 2.77 GAA, .912 SV%, 46.67 Win %

What am I missing?


u forgot that mrazek was unreal in the playoffs and played on a winning team- agree with you, definitely better than markstrom
GMTD liked this.
Sep. 24, 2019 at 6:05 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,140
Likes: 4,979
No, Mrazek is better than Markstrom
GMTD liked this.
Sep. 24, 2019 at 6:14 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 966
Likes: 335
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Mrazek - 2.39GAA, .914 SV%, 57.5 Win %
Markstrom - 2.77 GAA, .912 SV%, 46.67 Win %

What am I missing?


Markstrom 60 GP almost 1900 shots
Mrazek 40 GP 1100 shots

Carolina D - Hamilton, Pesce, Faulk Slavin
Vancouver D - Hutton, Biega, Sautner, Brisebois, Stetcher (Edler, Tanev injured for majority of the season)

Carolina also had a much better forward group than VAN last year, so you're missing a lot of contributing factors.
ItsBlowTime liked this.
Sep. 24, 2019 at 6:44 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 6,101
Quoting: canucks_Fan_53
Markstrom 60 GP almost 1900 shots
Mrazek 40 GP 1100 shots

Carolina D - Hamilton, Pesce, Faulk Slavin
Vancouver D - Hutton, Biega, Sautner, Brisebois, Stetcher (Edler, Tanev injured for majority of the season)

Carolina also had a much better forward group than VAN last year, so you're missing a lot of contributing factors.


So you made the argument that Markstrom isn't necessarily as bad as his numbers might seem, but you've not provided any evidence to why Markstrom is better than Mrazek.
GMTD liked this.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 11:04 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 966
Likes: 335
Quoting: tkecanuck341
So you made the argument that Markstrom isn't necessarily as bad as his numbers might seem, but you've not provided any evidence to why Markstrom is better than Mrazek.


the point i made is that there is much more to 'how good a goalie is' than GAA, SV% or win% you want to think Mrazek is better, fill your boots, just keep in mind that CAR has a cup contending line up. and VAN has a rebuilding roster that faced more injuries to starters than most other teams in the league. and a goalie's stats are always, always better when on a winning team.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll