SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Probably what happens

Created by: yikes
Team: 2019-20 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 24, 2019
Published: Sep. 24, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Dillon won’t be moved, so attempted a trade where he’s kept and still getting help upfront.

Dillons value comes from him being valuable to PD, he could pull something good through trade but that has to mean he’s alluring to the other team, when really he’s more alluring to the sharks. We keep him as it’s in our best interests if we want to win playoff games. Keeping our depth.
Trades
1.
SJS
    Dillon will not be traded as it is probably in the Sharks best interests to keep him
    ARI
    2.
    SJS
    1. 2020 4th round pick (ARI)
    Additional Details:
    Moved for a pick anywhere
    3.
    SJS
      Now we’re presuming Bergmann plays well but nothing crazy, maybe 50GP, 20-28PTS; nothing to warrant sending him down as he isn’t bad but something that warrants a top 6 player. If it isn’t bergmann; whoever it is won’t be much above a 0.50 ppg in a best case whether it’s gambrell etc.
      ARI
      4.
      SJS
      1. Jenner, Boone
      2. 2020 6th round pick (CBJ)
      Additional Details:
      Price wise he isn’t as costly as Anderson, Bjork. They have texier and bemstrom up and coming; and I feel the price is somewhat close to what’s suggested.
      CBJ
      1. Chekhovich, Ivan
      2. Heed, Tim
      3. 2020 3rd round pick (PHI)
      4. 2022 2nd round pick (SJS)
      5.
      SJS
        Talking about bergmann and gambrell etc is who starts the year in our top 6
        ARI
        Buyouts
        DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
        2020
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the ARI
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the OTT
        Logo of the CBJ
        Logo of the PIT
        Logo of the WSH
        2021
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the SJS
        2022
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the SJS
        Logo of the SJS
        ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
        23$81,500,000$72,479,084$660,750$345,000$9,020,916
        Left WingCentreRight Wing
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $7,000,000$7,000,000
        LW, RW
        M-NTC
        UFA - 6
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $5,625,000$5,625,000
        C
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
        $3,750,000$3,750,000
        C, LW
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $3,000,000$3,000,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 4
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $8,000,000$8,000,000
        C
        M-NTC
        UFA - 8
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $1,000,000$1,000,000
        RW, LW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $1,500,000$1,500,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $2,000,000$2,000,000
        C, LW
        NMC
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $836,667$836,667 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
        LW, RW
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $925,000$925,000
        C, LW
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $700,000$700,000
        C
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $700,000$700,000
        C
        UFA - 1
        Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $7,000,000$7,000,000
        LD/RD
        NMC
        UFA - 7
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $10,000,000$10,000,000
        RD
        NMC
        UFA - 8
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $5,750,000$5,750,000
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 5
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $675,000$675,000
        LD/RD
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $5,280,000$5,280,000
        RD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 6
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $1,900,000$1,900,000
        G
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
        LD
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $1,635,000$1,635,000
        LD
        UFA - 1
        ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $800,000$800,000
        RD
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $700,000$700,000
        LD
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the San Jose Sharks
        $700,000$700,000
        LW
        UFA - 1

        Embed Code

        • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
        • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

        Text-Embed

        Click to Highlight
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 5:50 p.m.
        #1
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2019
        Posts: 244
        Likes: 81
        I think you're overpaying for Jenner there by a lot.

        Hell that package might get you Kreider instead.
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 5:53 p.m.
        #2
        Thread Starter
        EklundCelebriniSmith
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2019
        Posts: 10,057
        Likes: 12,816
        Quoting: Bulletclub94
        I think you're overpaying for Jenner there by a lot.

        Hell that package might get you Kreider instead.


        Kreider is gonna cost more money and he’s older, I think Jenner can still be above a 40 point guy and won’t cost Kreiders UFA paycheque. Plus Kreider may just leave the sharks. Would you say take out Chekhovich or take out the 2nd?
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 5:56 p.m.
        #3
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2019
        Posts: 244
        Likes: 81
        Quoting: yikes
        Kreider is gonna cost more money and he’s older, I think Jenner can still be above a 40 point guy and won’t cost Kreiders UFA paycheque. Plus Kreider may just leave the sharks. Would you say take out Chekhovich or take out the 2nd?


        Negative, if you take out Chek the 2nd would need to be conditional based upon team playoff performance that can reach a 1st. If Chek is in the deal I'd do a conditional 3rd that becomes a 2nd if the sharks reach the cup.
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 5:56 p.m.
        #4
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2019
        Posts: 244
        Likes: 81
        Jenner is what he is, is a 3rd line wing really gonna be a piece that puts you guys over the top?
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 5:57 p.m.
        #5
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2019
        Posts: 244
        Likes: 81
        I'd do a Kreider trade like this

        Sharks get Kreider and 4th

        Rangers gets Melker Kalrsson, Chek and conditional 3rd round pick that could become a 2nd if the sharks reach the cup.

        Money works out that way.
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 5:59 p.m.
        #6
        Thread Starter
        EklundCelebriniSmith
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2019
        Posts: 10,057
        Likes: 12,816
        Quoting: Bulletclub94
        Negative, if you take out Chek the 2nd would need to be conditional based upon team playoff performance that can reach a 1st. If Chek is in the deal I'd do a conditional 3rd that becomes a 2nd if the sharks reach the cup.


        Quoting: Bulletclub94
        Jenner is what he is, is a 3rd line wing really gonna be a piece that puts you guys over the top?


        Sorry I meant Kreiders is gonna cost more cap wise. And no but it creates depth, we don’t lose our 2020 2nd or a huge piece. Jenner’s 3 mil also leaves us with cap space for offseason. The moves helps us a lot in the sense that it creates opportunity and he’s shown flashes of top6 before but struggled recently, I like him personally but aware the move doesn’t move the sharks drastically but I say the same for Kreider, and other rentals who move the needle temporarily but I think Kreider isn’t worth the ask
        Bulletclub94 liked this.
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 6:00 p.m.
        #7
        Thread Starter
        EklundCelebriniSmith
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2019
        Posts: 10,057
        Likes: 12,816
        Quoting: Bulletclub94
        I'd do a Kreider trade like this

        Sharks get Kreider and 4th

        Rangers gets Melker Kalrsson, Chek and conditional 3rd round pick that could become a 2nd if the sharks reach the cup.

        Money works out that way.


        If that’s Kreiders price it’s not terrible but I see a lot of rangers fans saying a first and a prospect are the start
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 6:01 p.m.
        #8
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2019
        Posts: 244
        Likes: 81
        Quoting: yikes
        If that’s Kreiders price it’s not terrible but I see a lot of rangers fans saying a first and a prospect are the start


        I'm a Rangers fan.... I also witnessed half those morons say Zucc was gonna get us a 1st and a prospect.

        Ranger fans overvalue their players almost as bad as Toronto fans.
        yikes liked this.
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 6:06 p.m.
        #9
        Thread Starter
        EklundCelebriniSmith
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2019
        Posts: 10,057
        Likes: 12,816
        Quoting: Bulletclub94
        I'm a Rangers fan.... I also witnessed half those morons say Zucc was gonna get us a 1st and a prospect.

        Ranger fans overvalue their players almost as bad as Toronto fans.


        Fair. I agree with that ask for Kreider you suggested. But what’s Kreider gonna ask for, if we can get him on a 5.5 for 5 years I’d be on board but that extension has to be discussed for myself to want the trade (if adding a additional third or something for the extension talks than I’m down), but if Kreider wants more than 5 years idk. And if he wants above 6 idk either as we need our cap within the next few years for Hertl down the road, labanc coming up, and rookies taking roster spots
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 6:15 p.m.
        #10
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2019
        Posts: 244
        Likes: 81
        At this point who cares, this is the sharks chance at a cup. Sometimes going all in and dealing with letting the player walk is what you need to do.
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 6:25 p.m.
        #11
        Grierless Sharks Fan
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Dec. 2017
        Posts: 2,935
        Likes: 914
        I would love to get Jenner on the Sharks.
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 7:50 p.m.
        #12
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Aug. 2019
        Posts: 8,796
        Likes: 3,226
        Disgusting trade. WOuld not give up a c twin for Boone jenner or rental Kreider. Only in a deal for someone like Ehlers
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 8:38 p.m.
        #13
        AllJonedOut
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2019
        Posts: 1,463
        Likes: 266
        Quoting: Bulletclub94
        Jenner is what he is, is a 3rd line wing really gonna be a piece that puts you guys over the top?


        Agreed. Nothing special... a half step up from boedker if that...
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 9:16 p.m.
        #14
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2019
        Posts: 244
        Likes: 81
        Quoting: papishark
        Disgusting trade. WOuld not give up a c twin for Boone jenner or rental Kreider. Only in a deal for someone like Ehlers


        How you making that cap work?
        Sep. 24, 2019 at 10:12 p.m.
        #15
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Aug. 2019
        Posts: 8,796
        Likes: 3,226
        Quoting: Bulletclub94
        How you making that cap work?


        Im not saying straight up, clearly the deal would need to be bigger and I think its unlikely Ehlers even moves but that case is the only one im willing to give up a really good prospect for
         
        Reply
        To create a post please Login or Register
        Question:
        Options:
        Add Option
        Submit Poll