SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pens

Created by: riles23
Team: 2019-20 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 1, 2019
Published: Oct. 1, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
ANA
  1. Aston-Reese, Zach
  2. Johnson, Jack
  3. 2020 3rd round pick (PIT)
PIT
  1. Rowney, Carter
Additional Details:
This trade can be for either Rowney or Grant or any other depth forward
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$56,634,592$0$2,182,500$24,865,408
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,541,000$1,541,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,498,925$1,498,925
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 8
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000 (Performance Bonus$1,200,000$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 1, 2019 at 11:07 a.m.
#1
Hockey God Genius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,260
Likes: 810
Deal
Oct. 1, 2019 at 11:16 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 5,933
Easy decline from ANA
Oct. 1, 2019 at 11:35 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 910
Likes: 208
We don't need another LD...we need a RHD
Oct. 1, 2019 at 2:43 p.m.
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 24,611
Pittsburgh doesn't have the Jensen-Mayfield-DeMelo NHL RhD we need, so we would want a good prospect like Addison or Marino and a first as part of this package, and the Penguins have plenty of depth forwards, so they would probably only be happy with one of our LhD prospects like Larsson or Mahura.
Oct. 1, 2019 at 7:28 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Pass. We don't need Bieksa 2.0. You can keep that dumpster fire. Would rather use that D spot to grow our own. Guhle/Larsson can't be any worse than JJ.

Going to cost a 1st to dump that contract though.
Oct. 1, 2019 at 7:32 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Pittsburgh doesn't have the Jensen-Mayfield-DeMelo NHL RhD we need, so we would want a good prospect like Addison or Marino and a first as part of this package, and the Penguins have plenty of depth forwards, so they would probably only be happy with one of our LhD prospects like Larsson or Mahura.


Neither Addison nor Marino are anything special. I don't see why we would return Larsson for them. JJ + 1st for a token 6th-7th round pick is the going rate to dump a terrible contract. We don't need Addison or Marino and certainly don't need them at the cost of Larsson. If needed, he can be moved in a better deal. However, our recent deals moving out D-men having turned out so good. With that said, I'd be more patient with Larsson/Guhle/Mahura.
Oct. 1, 2019 at 8:05 p.m.
#7
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 24,611
Quoting: mytduxfan
Neither Addison nor Marino are anything special. I don't see why we would return Larsson for them. JJ + 1st for a token 6th-7th round pick is the going rate to dump a terrible contract. We don't need Addison or Marino and certainly don't need them at the cost of Larsson. If needed, he can be moved in a better deal. However, our recent deals moving out D-men [haven't] turned out so good. With that said, I'd be more patient with Larsson/Guhle/Mahura.


We're not getting Addison or Marino for Larsson; we're getting one of them and a first for Larsson. (My thinking about this trade is Larsson = the first; Johnson's contract = Addison; I don't think we could get a simple Larsson for a first trade.) I disagree that we don't need an A prospect RhD in the system, because we don't have one now. And Johnson and the first for a sixth is a pipe dream because Pittsburgh isn't as desperate as most people think to get rid of Johnson's contract; they can send him to Wilkes Barre-Scranton this year and buy him out next June and then all they have to do to is move Bjugstad or Gudbranson and they get to re-up all of their free agents, including Galchenyuk and Murray, except for Schultz. I would take my chances now and trade Larsson or Mahura and rely on the other and Guhle, with Lacombe and Thrun in the pipeline, to constitute our left side for the next 5 years or more (behind Fowler and Lindholm, of course).
Oct. 2, 2019 at 7:03 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: OldNYIfan
We're not getting Addison or Marino for Larsson; we're getting one of them and a first for Larsson. (My thinking about this trade is Larsson = the first; Johnson's contract = Addison; I don't think we could get a simple Larsson for a first trade.) I disagree that we don't need an A prospect RhD in the system, because we don't have one now. And Johnson and the first for a sixth is a pipe dream because Pittsburgh isn't as desperate as most people think to get rid of Johnson's contract; they can send him to Wilkes Barre-Scranton this year and buy him out next June and then all they have to do to is move Bjugstad or Gudbranson and they get to re-up all of their free agents, including Galchenyuk and Murray, except for Schultz. I would take my chances now and trade Larsson or Mahura and rely on the other and Guhle, with Lacombe and Thrun in the pipeline, to constitute our left side for the next 5 years or more (behind Fowler and Lindholm, of course).


I guess we just have a difference on opinion then. I don't see Addison being anything special. He's producing less than what Mahura did in the WHL. Don't see his game translating all that well to the NHL. Like most offensive D-men, his D needs a lot of work. IMO, he'll be another kid that struggles to grasp the defensive parts of the NHL game and his offensive game will suffer as a result. In terms of Marino, again, I don't see anything special. Certainly nothing more than what Larsson gives us. For me it's a significant downgrade for a change of handedness. Not worth it. Having all RHD on the right side is overblown IMO. We're much better off having good LHD playing right side than bad RHD.

If PIT is unwilling to give up a 1st to dump JJ they can keep him. He's Bieksa 2.0 and I want nothing to do with him. A 1st is the minimum for me. If they're not desparate to dump him, then why are we even discussing the possibility of taking him? As if PIT is doing us a favour by offering us JJ cheap? He's terrible! EZ pass for me.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Oct. 2, 2019 at 7:49 a.m.
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 24,611
Quoting: mytduxfan
I guess we just have a difference of opinion then. I don't see Addison being anything special. He's producing less than what Mahura did in the WHL. Don't see his game translating all that well to the NHL. Like most offensive D-men, his D needs a lot of work. IMO, he'll be another kid that struggles to grasp the defensive parts of the NHL game and his offensive game will suffer as a result. In terms of Marino, again, I don't see anything special. Certainly nothing more than what Larsson gives us. For me it's a significant downgrade for a change of handedness. Not worth it. Having all RHD on the right side is overblown IMO. We're much better off having good LHD playing right side than bad RHD.

If PIT is unwilling to give up a 1st to dump JJ they can keep him. He's Bieksa 2.0 and I want nothing to do with him. A 1st is the minimum for me. If they're not desparate to dump him, then why are we even discussing the possibility of taking him? As if PIT is doing us a favour by offering us JJ cheap? He's terrible! EZ pass for me.


My thinking here is that between Addison and the first, we can get a RhD who is better than Larsson, and if not, both of the acquisitions are at least the equivalent of a bottom-pairing defenseman. The risks of this strategy are (1) the eventual benefits are three or four years down the road, and (2) they don't arrive at all. The cost of these risks is mitigated by the fact that we are dealing from strength, just as in the Pettersson-Sprong trade, but my idea may turn out no better. Your position is the prudent one.

I guess I just wish we had gotten Nick Jensen or Dylan DeMelo when they were available. We still have another shot at DeMelo, of course.
mytduxfan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll