Forums/Armchair-GM

Is Turris Available

Created by: Flames22
Initial Creation Date: Oct 9, 2019
Published: Oct 9 at 11:59 am
Team: 2019-20 Calgary Flames
Team Explanation
Not sure if Nashville would be willing to part with Turris, but if so, I think he could play the same type of role that Kadri would have played had he accepted the trade.
Trades
CGY
  1. Turris, Kyle
NSH
  1. Jankowski, Mark
  2. Frolík, Michael
  3. Quine, Alan
Buyouts
  • Troy Brouwer: $1,500,000
  • Michael Stone: $1,166,667
DRAFT YEARROUND 1ROUND 2ROUND 3ROUND 4ROUND 5ROUND 6ROUND 7
2020
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
2021
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
2022
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES BONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,370,042$0$565,000$129,958
Left WingCenterRight Wing
CGY
Gaudreau, Johnny
$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 3
CGY
Monahan, Sean
$6,375,000
C
UFA - 4
CGY
Lindholm, Elias
$4,850,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
CGY
Tkachuk, Matthew
$7,000,000
LW
RFA - 3
NSH
Turris, Kyle
$6,000,000
C
UFA - 5
CGY
Bennett, Sam
$2,550,000
RW, C, LW
RFA - 2
CGY
Mangiapane, Andrew
$715,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
CGY
Backlund, Mikael
$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 5
CGY
Czarnik, Austin
$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
CGY
Lucic, Milan
$5,250,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
CGY
Ryan, Derek
$3,125,000
C
UFA - 2
CGY
Rieder, Tobias
$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
CGY
Giordano, Mark
$6,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
CGY
Brodie, TJ
$4,650,400
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
CGY
Rittich, David
$2,750,000
G
UFA - 2
CGY
Hanifin, Noah
$4,950,000
LD
UFA - 5
CGY
Hamonic, Travis
$3,857,143
RD
UFA - 1
CGY
Talbot, Cam
$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
CGY
Kylington, Oliver
$730,833
LD
RFA - 1
CGY
Andersson, Rasmus
$755,833
RD
RFA - 1
CGY
Välimäki, Juuso
$894,166
LD
RFA - 2
CGY
Stone, Michael
$700,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct 9 at 12:04
#1
Biased Opinion
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 583
Nashville would happily do that deal
Oct 9 at 12:39
#2
Cale 4 Calder
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 1,021
I Think NSH wants to get rid of him to clear cap space. 6M until he's 35 doesn't look great for a player who already started declining last season
Oct 9 at 12:52
#3
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 729
Nashville accepts, no take backs, have fun
jspenc40 liked this.
Oct 9 at 12:52
#4
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,598
Likes: 2,814
What do you do when you take a bad contract, turn it into a worse one, (Neal for Lucic)? Why not trade good assets for another terrible contract.
jspenc40 liked this.
Oct 9 at 1:27
#5
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 638
Likes: 155
Quoting: LoganOllivier
What do you do when you take a bad contract, turn it into a worse one, (Neal for Lucic)? Why not trade good assets for another terrible contract.


Quoting: BCAPP
Nashville accepts, no take backs, have fun


Quoting: Barbs
Nashville would happily do that deal


As a Nashville fan:

I wouldn't trade Turris right now at all. He has looked very good so far this season and appears to be back to his old self. He's been the "3C" and has managed 1G 1A while centering Jarnkrok and Grimaldi. So he's basically having to do it by himself and has looked good doing it. Let him rehabilitate his career some and trade him if we need the capspace down the road which i don't think we'll need. I would rather trade Smith then Turris tbh.
Flames22 liked this.
Oct 9 at 2:25
#6
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 729
Quoting: herzausstein
As a Nashville fan:

I wouldn't trade Turris right now at all. He has looked very good so far this season and appears to be back to his old self. He's been the "3C" and has managed 1G 1A while centering Jarnkrok and Grimaldi. So he's basically having to do it by himself and has looked good doing it. Let him rehabilitate his career some and trade him if we need the capspace down the road which i don't think we'll need. I would rather trade Smith then Turris tbh.


How much longer do you have Smith? You have about 4 players who can play 3C.

He should be able to rehabilitate his career some, but he is more than likely to decline in the coming year or two.

I'd be happy to get Jankowski for him as I strongly suspext Jankowski will be the better player over the next 5 years
Oct 9 at 2:46
#7
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 638
Likes: 155
Quoting: BCAPP
How much longer do you have Smith? You have about 4 players who can play 3C.

He should be able to rehabilitate his career some, but he is more than likely to decline in the coming year or two.

I'd be happy to get Jankowski for him as I strongly suspext Jankowski will be the better player over the next 5 years


Smith is a UFA at the end of the year. With the way Granlund is playing, I imagine we'll try to keep him over smith. We won't have room financially to keep Smith, Granlund, and Josi.

Sure Bonino, Sissons, and Jarnkrok could make a passable 3C.... none of them should be anywhere near the 2C spot should injuries occur to Joey or Duchene. Turris can step up incase of injuries and makes the team overall much deeper. I personally think Jankowski is going to top out around Jarnkrok in terms of production in that 30-40 point range.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Remove Option
Submit Poll