SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If Hall Is Willing To Sign

Created by: TN71
Team: 2020-21 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 16, 2019
Published: Oct. 16, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Explanation:
1) Domi gets a bridge deal. He can't really demand more than 6 mil because Point only got 6.75 mil.
2) If Mete can't produce offense this year, he won't get much more than 2 mil. I don't believe he gets more than 3 mil anyways with a good year.
3) The only way to convince Romanov to come to North America is to give him good minutes with an experienced dman like Petry.
4) Chiarot is an expendable piece. If we can get rid of his contract, it is for the better. He still has value and Colorado is a great team that could use the defensive depth to make them contenders.
5) Although it is hard to get rid of this valuable part of our roster, Paul Byron probably has to go sometime. Byron will be a great addition to an Edmonton roster that NEEDS good forwards.
6) Even though it seems unrealistic, Taylor Hall is a very good fit in Montreal. He is a pure goal scorer that would bve given prime minutes on the PP and even strength. He could join a team on the rise that could be a contender if he joins.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,750,000
3$1,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$11,500,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (COL)
2.
MTL
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (EDM)
  2. 2020 5th round pick (EDM)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$83,000,000$76,581,308$0$3,795,000$6,418,692
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$11,500,000$11,500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,800,000$4,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,083,333$3,083,333
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$771,666$771,666 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 16, 2019 at 9:28 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 124
Likes: 29
I made a few roster similar to yours so I share your search for a power forward like Hall. But the problem is you don't have money left for the year after. You have Danault, Tatar, Gallagher Petry Armia going UFA and Poehling, KK, Mete, Fleury going RFA. That's almost half of the team !

My conclusion : unless Bergevin gets rid of the approx 12 M$ given to Alzner and Weber, we are in trouble and won't be able to add that star player to contend. Tha's why I don't mind if MB give away a no.1 pick to get rid of Alzner.

I might be wrong though. Would be curious to see your roster for 2021-22.
Oct. 16, 2019 at 10:04 p.m.
#2
Billy739
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 1,629
Quoting: HabStraction
I made a few roster similar to yours so I share your search for a power forward like Hall. But the problem is you don't have money left for the year after. You have Danault, Tatar, Gallagher Petry Armia going UFA and Poehling, KK, Mete, Fleury going RFA. That's almost half of the team !

My conclusion : unless Bergevin gets rid of the approx 12 M$ given to Alzner and Weber, we are in trouble and won't be able to add that star player to contend. Tha's why I don't mind if MB give away a no.1 pick to get rid of Alzner.

I might be wrong though. Would be curious to see your roster for 2021-22.


Click the longterm outlook above

32m with 10/23 players signed
if Danault , Gallagher and Petry can be re-signed for 18-19m total given what Domi re-signed for if they all take similar deals between 5-6.5m its possible
that leaves 13m fill the other 10 spots .

this sounds all very reasonable until you look at who we got to sign for 13m

Lehkonen
Kotkanemi
Poehling
Suzuki
Fleury

Kotkanemi is the only one who will be eligible for Arbitration so he's the only one who can challenge
there is the worry about offer sheets but i dont see Kotkanemi making waves , he'll likely sign the spring before he's RFA.

Poehling , Suzuki , and Fleury could all get fair value but there is the risk a team like CAR returns the favor and offers him a 5 year deal walking him into UFA .

its doable but it depends heavily on Romanov being Drew Doughty level good straight out the gate after trading Chiarot senselessly given how Key he's been defending our goalies this year its just foolish moving him . move Kulak while he's got value after we got him for the throw in players from the Plekanec deal as he's inconsistent as **** and is a poor mans Mete . Romanov's good but he needs time as he's 2 year into the KHL and not capable of the minutes that is being suggested so to think he can are the NHL level carry the weight for Mete and Kulak is just baffling . if Mete and Romanov are there you Need a Chariot who can play 21-23 minutes comfortably and not a Kulak who struggles after 16-17 minutes .

that being said if i was gonna throw 11.5m dollars away on something i'd likely throw some of it Mikael Granlunds way as
Granlund-Kotkanemi-Armia sounds like ****ing gold
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll