SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Generating 5 on 5 scoring

Created by: hanson493
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 18, 2019
Published: Oct. 18, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This team still cant score 5v5 goals. Part of it is they are trying to get too cute. But at some point you have to put guys in a spot to succeed. Ritchie is weighing whatever line he goes on down right now.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$77,571,667$0$2,432,500$3,928,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:25 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,652
Likes: 8,773
Bjork has 3-3-6 in 5 games at Prov. Had a great camp. He will be getting a look sooner rather than later. Problem is the only FW that has options is Kuhlman snd he does not deserve to be sent down.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:26 a.m.
#2
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
5 stars. I love the idea of putting Heinen on the top line. I would say that I’m not a fan of putting Bjork in the lineup. They’ve rushed him twice and he’s failed. He hasn’t been able to get significant time in Providence due to injury. I would give a good hard look at putting Kuraly on the third line LW and slipping Backes into the 4c role.
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:28 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
Quoting: Gofnut999
Bjork has 3-3-6 in 5 games at Prov. Had a great camp. He will be getting a look sooner rather than later. Problem is the only FW that has options is Kuhlman snd he does not deserve to be sent down.


i agree, thats why i waived ritchie.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:32 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
Quoting: Bcarlo25
5 stars. I love the idea of putting Heinen on the top line. I would say that I’m not a fan of putting Bjork in the lineup. They’ve rushed him twice and he’s failed. He hasn’t been able to get significant time in Providence due to injury. I would give a good hard look at putting Kuraly on the third line LW and slipping Backes into the 4c role.


Its more or less that theyve put bjork in his off wing and he got injured both times. They tried desperately to get him to work at rw because senyshyn somehow cant get his offensive game to translate from juniors to the pros and their rw prospects are almost non-existent.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:35 a.m.
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: hanson493
Its more or less that theyve put bjork in his off wing and he got injured both times. They tried desperately to get him to work at rw because senyshyn somehow cant get his offensive game to translate from juniors to the pros and their rw prospects are almost non-existent.


Are you saying he got hurt because he was playing his off wing?

Bjork played RW long before he signed with Boston.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:36 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,652
Likes: 8,773
Quoting: hanson493
Its more or less that theyve put bjork in his off wing and he got injured both times. They tried desperately to get him to work at rw because senyshyn somehow cant get his offensive game to translate from juniors to the pros and their rw prospects are almost non-existent.


Bjork played RW in college and for US jr team. It’s his off wing but it’s his comfort zone.
hanson493 and Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:40 a.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
I like this a lot! that first line is great, but yeah they haven't done much 5on5...
I would just point out that Debrusk and Kuhlman seem to have great chemistry, they put up those two good goals in the other game (that both were overturned), but at least they can connect
But obviously you aren't moving Pasta to the third line so whatever works works!
hanson493 liked this.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:42 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Are you saying he got hurt because he was playing his off wing?

Bjork played RW long before he signed with Boston.


The first injury certainly wasnt from them rushing him up to the big leagues, the 2nd you could argue was from them rushing him back from the 1st surgery but both were unfortunate. I guess im saying its not his natural wing so it could contribute. (i honestly have no idea how long hes played rw for)
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:44 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
Quoting: bsilk18
I like this a lot! that first line is great, but yeah they haven't done much 5on5...
I would just point out that Debrusk and Kuhlman seem to have great chemistry, they put up those two good goals in the other game (that both were overturned), but at least they can connect
But obviously you aren't moving Pasta to the third line so whatever works works!


I was thinking about the speed factor. Krejci doesnt play fast and i think that could hinder debrusk and kuhlman together who both play faster. I know its not really the popular opinion but i think they should have moved krejci while his value was at his highest this offseason and gotten a faster 2c to play with these guys.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:46 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,652
Likes: 8,773
Quoting: hanson493
i agree, thats why i waived ritchie.


It’s either him or Lindholm. Lindholm can play C, more versatile , and is useful on the PK so it would probably be Ritchie. But i doubt he clears waivers so they will hesitate.

Another reason they should have just bit the bullet and bought out Backes. Would not have saved any cap space this year, but it would have next year and it opens a roster spot.
hanson493 liked this.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 10:49 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
Quoting: Gofnut999
It’s either him or Lindholm. Lindholm can play C, more versatile , and is useful on the PK so it would probably be Ritchie. But i doubt he clears waivers so they will hesitate.

Another reason they should have just bit the bullet and bought out Backes. Would not have saved any cap space this year, but it would have next year and it opens a roster spot.


I mean they could always try and bury backes in providence... kind of classless move to make but when moore is ready to come back they have to move money anyways. someone is going to get put down and it shouldnt be kuhlman.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 12:09 p.m.
#12
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: hanson493
The first injury certainly wasnt from them rushing him up to the big leagues, the 2nd you could argue was from them rushing him back from the 1st surgery but both were unfortunate. I guess im saying its not his natural wing so it could contribute. (i honestly have no idea how long hes played rw for)


What i’m Saying is that the RW is his natural wing.
hanson493 liked this.
Oct. 18, 2019 at 12:21 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
Quoting: Bcarlo25
What i’m Saying is that the RW is his natural wing.


so back to trying to generate some 5v5 scoring, you would leave bjork down and bump kuraly up and put backes over lindholm at 4c?
Oct. 18, 2019 at 1:18 p.m.
#14
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: hanson493
so back to trying to generate some 5v5 scoring, you would leave bjork down and bump kuraly up and put backes over lindholm at 4c?


If it’s me, I’m signing Coyle to an extension today, putting him with Bergeron and Marchand, bumping Pastrnak down with Krejci and Marchand, call up studnicka and play him with Heinen and Kuraly, and do whatever for the fourth line.

In terms of realism I would like Heinen on the top line, and Kuraly on the third line. plug the fourth together somehow
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll