there's still time to delete this before to many people see it

cmon? he gave the leafs the "shutdown center" they needed

nikita tryamkin more like norris tryamkin

Canucks say no thanks. keep your 7m floater. no way they want to take on another big contract when they have to resign EP and QH after next year. if they cant find a taker for Sutter then hang onto him as his contract runs out just in time . with the way the Canucks are playing why trade to get softer and easier to play against. we do not need to help the leafs out of their cap problems. only way we take Nylander is if the leafs take Loui and that isn't going to happen.

Canucks are moving in a positive direction with a much clearer cap situation than Toronto but im sure Dubas has it all figures out(not)

i mean all dubas has to do is not spend 20+MM on 3rd/4th liners like Vancouver and he's fine.

Leafs have the highest goals against in the league
Canucks have the least

I mean canucks dont have the least, it's pretty early in the season, so single games tend to skew results. So ya sure base your trend line off those 10 games,. Seems smart /s

Also nice job deflecting from the cap situation. As i said before, your cap situation has a bunch of replacement level guys like eriksson beagle baertschi roussel and the luongo recapture tying up a **** ton of money for no benefit.

Also, your trade proposal is ****. Unless you're willing to trade boeser for a similar package of scraps dont expect other teams to do the same.

you mean the 3/4th liners that are helping the Canucks to a top 4 PK unit. that actually can win a puck battle and protect a lead. the horror that they invested in that type of thing. no I guess instead its better to invest 50% of the cap on 4 players so that your probably going to have to play with less than 20 skaters because of the cap and injuries. not to mention what do they do once McDermott and Hyman come off the LTIR who do they get rid of? I wonder how many of the 3/4 liners from the Canucks Babcock would like to have (pretty sure Sutter and Beagel would quickly become his favourites) plus none of them are signed for more than 3 years.
Canucks are the right path and yes LOUI's contract sucks . but that is 1 bad contract Dubas got taken to the cleaners the last 2 offseasons. he is paying Nylander more than tampa is paying for Point who only had 2 less points than Marner who he is paying more than Kucherov who had 34 points more than Marner.
it ok I'm sure some of the cap issues for the leafs will be sorted once Matthews is traded to Arizona for some D and some extras

oh ya early season pk%'s mean a ton... it's like you and boss have never heard of sample sizes.

Also point's is a bridge, so not really the best comparison, and why do you all want nylander so bad if it's such a terrible contract.

to be clear I wouldn't want Nylander and neither should the Canucks. so what if Points contract is a bridge deal the leafs still overpaid for Nylander . Tampa got a significantly better player signed for less. Point had 2 less points than Marner yet Toronto is paying Marner 4m a year more(not to mention Austin is getting 5m more) can you say that Marner(or Matthews) is a 4+m a year better player(for 2 points) come on admit it Dubas hands out dollar and term like its monopoly money.

as for the sample size Vancouver had a better pk% than Toronto last year and that was with both Beagel and Sutter injured for large portions of the season who did Toronto pick up to improve their pk. with those healthy players and the improved D they may drop but they are set up to be much better than the leafs this year.

all teams have a few questionable contracts at least the canucks don't have 4 players eating 50% of the cap for the next 5 years.