Quoting: Devilsfan101
If it doesn’t include Byram it’s a no. Because it has an extension it’s Byram plus
Rather than make up this fictitious offer based on nothing, find a trade that happened already in the last 20 years and use that as basis for your argument. It'll be way more realistic and might actually convince someone. Plus, NJ doesn't necessarily have the option to sell Hall with a potential extension. That tactic was used maybe once on a good player in history and then GM's smartened up. They realized that not adding a 8th year on a contract is a GOOD thing. Most UFA's are in their mid 30's by that time and more than likely are declining. They might have to pay a little more in cap but not having to do that 8th year is sometimes a good thing on a player whose 28-29 years old already.
Also its not that Hall isn't as good as Byram or vice versa, its that NJ does not hold power in this negotiation if for whatever reason Hall is not being resigned. (On the flipside, if they resign him and then try to trade him, they can then ask for anything they want)'
All they have is market demand and no team is offering a top 5 pick prospect for a guy they technically could have a chance to sign as a free agent in a years time for free..... If the cost for Hall extended is Byram+, no team will accept, NJ will be forced to either bring down their price or lose him for nothing. They're choice. Simply using other star players that were traded as pending UFA's as examples, the cost to get Hall will be way less than you think. Not garbage but not "stupidly amazing" either.
Erik Karlsson, a future HOF'er, got a collection of picks and B prospects. Not one of those prospects was even a blue chip. Norris was the best they thing they got and he is by no means anything crazy good. They may get lucky with SJ 1st round pick this year as SJ may be a lottery team his year but I think no one was expecting that to happen when this trade was done.