SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Byron to Edmonton

Created by: itsgilli98
Team: 2019-20 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 30, 2019
Published: Oct. 30, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I love Byron but I feel like he is the odd man out. I changed the lines in the same mind set of now where we don't really have a first line and fourth line. 2 second lines and 2 third lines. I'd also like to see Juulsen back with MTL since he was doing good last year before he got injured. I'd let him get in game shape in Laval before tho.
Trades
MTL
  1. 2020 1st round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Byron, Paul
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
Shaw got us a 2nd a 3rd soooooo if we add the third maybe that would be enough. If not I'm okay with byron for a 2nd and a 3rd like Shaw. I feel like Byron's speed would fit very good with McDavid.
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$69,915,475$0$3,907,500$11,584,525

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,800,000$4,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,083,333$3,083,333
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,150,000$3,150,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$748,333$748,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$771,666$771,666 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$763,333$763,333 (Performance Bonus$70,000$70K)
RW, LW
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 30, 2019 at 10:38 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 6,692
Let's just assume the value is equal, just because you add quantity to a deal doesn't necessarily get you quality in return. For example, EDM would be wayyy more interested in giving up a 2nd and a 3rd (If they were interested in doing that based on what you said) for Byron than giving up a 1st but getting a 3rd back.
itsgilli98 liked this.
Oct. 30, 2019 at 10:42 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Itagilli98
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 94
Likes: 24
Quoting: F50marco
Let's just assume the value is equal, just because you add quantity to a deal doesn't necessarily get you quality in return. For example, EDM would be wayyy more interested in giving up a 2nd and a 3rd (If they were interested in doing that based on what you said) for Byron than giving up a 1st but getting a 3rd back.


I believe edmonton could make the playoffs this years so it wouldn't be a high 1st rounder. Maybe if it's conditional (lottery protected) ?
Oct. 30, 2019 at 10:43 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 850
Likes: 224
Quoting: itsgilli98
I believe edmonton could make the playoffs this years so it wouldn't be a high 1st rounder. Maybe if it's conditional (lottery protected) ?


Quoting: F50marco
Let's just assume the value is equal, just because you add quantity to a deal doesn't necessarily get you quality in return. For example, EDM would be wayyy more interested in giving up a 2nd and a 3rd (If they were interested in doing that based on what you said) for Byron than giving up a 1st but getting a 3rd back.


Maybe by TDL if Edmonton is still in the top of the league and Montreal are way out of playoff, Byron and a 2nd (32-40) vs 1st (24-31) is an option. But as F50Marco mentionned it, they would definitively do 2nd and 3rd before this
itsgilli98 liked this.
Oct. 30, 2019 at 10:44 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Itagilli98
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 94
Likes: 24
Quoting: KCarry74
Maybe by TDL if Edmonton is still in the top of the league and Montreal are way out of playoff, Byron and a 2nd (32-40) vs 1st (24-31) is an option. But as F50Marco mentionned it, they would definitively do 2nd and 3rd before this


yeah like I said I'm okay with getting a 2nd and a 3rd for Byron. I feel like it would still be good for both teams.
KCarry74 liked this.
Oct. 30, 2019 at 11:04 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 6,692
Quoting: itsgilli98
I believe edmonton could make the playoffs this years so it wouldn't be a high 1st rounder. Maybe if it's conditional (lottery protected) ?


Its not the point. Its that even if they want Byron, they can get him or someone else similar without having to touch their 1st rounder. So why take on a 3rd just to give the Habs a 1st instead? There is no incentive here. Byron is good but not that good to force EDM to have to make a rash decision. If we were talking about them getting Taylor Hall and that there are 7 other teams trying to get him, then you may have to just suck it up and make the deal but with a depth player like Byron you don't have to.

If EDM agreed that Byron was worth a 2nd and a 3rd, that would be the offer. If MTL offers only to do it for a 1st and a rd coming back, IMO I would just walk away from the deal altogether.
itsgilli98 liked this.
Oct. 30, 2019 at 11:07 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 6,692
Quoting: KCarry74
Maybe by TDL if Edmonton is still in the top of the league and Montreal are way out of playoff, Byron and a 2nd (32-40) vs 1st (24-31) is an option. But as F50Marco mentionned it, they would definitively do 2nd and 3rd before this


Its not about dropping spots in the draft. yeah sure its only a couple spots potentially. Its principle. IF Byron was worth a 2nd and a 3rd, why not just pay that price and keep the 1st? Why up the ante to a 1st just top get another later pick back? Barring EDM winning the cup, every pick before it is a high chance at a solid NHL'er. Why risk losing that for....Byron? (And I like Byron but lets be real here too)
Oct. 30, 2019 at 11:54 a.m.
#7
Jay27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 1,044
Quoting: F50marco
Let's just assume the value is equal, just because you add quantity to a deal doesn't necessarily get you quality in return. For example, EDM would be wayyy more interested in giving up a 2nd and a 3rd (If they were interested in doing that based on what you said) for Byron than giving up a 1st but getting a 3rd back.


Well said sir. GM's don't generally like to trade their 1st rounders unless their name is Dubas.
F50marco liked this.
Oct. 30, 2019 at 12:00 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 6,692
Quoting: Jay27
Well said sir. GM's don't generally like to trade their 1st rounders unless their name is Dubas.


Actually don't mind both times Dubas traded his 1sts. Look at how many 1sts Doug Wilson has been trading away in recent years. flushed cheeks
Oct. 30, 2019 at 12:03 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
ahahahahahahh Byron is not worth a 1st or a 2nd and 3rd, like give me a break, he is overpaid and over the hill, his salary is way to high, he is not a 20 goal scorer anymore. good luck with this, it is the worst trade ever! If you think he is worth a first in one of the strongest drafts ever, you should keep him! Kick rocks
CD282 liked this.
Oct. 30, 2019 at 12:56 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 850
Likes: 224
Quoting: F50marco
Its not about dropping spots in the draft. yeah sure its only a couple spots potentially. Its principle. IF Byron was worth a 2nd and a 3rd, why not just pay that price and keep the 1st? Why up the ante to a 1st just top get another later pick back? Barring EDM winning the cup, every pick before it is a high chance at a solid NHL'er. Why risk losing that for....Byron? (And I like Byron but lets be real here too)


I only said that i can see this happening given this situation. Not said it will happen/it is logic
Oct. 30, 2019 at 1:49 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 7,635
Is this a joke? Nobody is giving up a 1st for Byron.

tears of joy
Copenhagen liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll