SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

You cant overpay for the best player in the world

Created by: Kyle_Davidson
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 31, 2019
Published: Oct. 31, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
CHI
  1. McDavid, Connor
Additional Details:
Obviously this happens in a parallel universe where the oilers aren’t doing good.
EDM
  1. Boqvist, Adam
  2. Dach, Kirby
  3. Saad, Brandon
  4. Seabrook, Brent
  5. 2020 1st round pick (CHI)
  6. 2021 2nd round pick (CHI)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$67,426,686$0$4,207,500$14,073,314
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,400,000$1,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 31, 2019 at 6:28 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 930
well you can certainly underpay and thats what this is. Seabrook has the worst contract in the league and the 1st and 2nd doesnt even cancel out his value. Gotta send Debrincat the other way
SevenLeg and CD282 liked this.
Oct. 31, 2019 at 6:41 p.m.
#2
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
realistically mcdavid would cost you Dach, kane, Strome , boqvist, and a 1st
mk458 and aedoran liked this.
Oct. 31, 2019 at 6:44 p.m.
#3
MK458
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 931
But you underpaid. Moving Seabrook's contract alone would cost you Boqvist and a 2nd...
Oct. 31, 2019 at 6:57 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,028
Likes: 9,330
Quoting: Isles777
realistically mcdavid would cost you Dach, kane, Strome , boqvist, and a 1st


Realistically no he wouldn't
Oct. 31, 2019 at 7:41 p.m.
#5
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,072
Likes: 12,828
Quoting: ChiHawk
Realistically no he wouldn't


Realistically it would close.

Kane
Dach
Boqvist
Unprotected 1st

But oilers would still decline
Oct. 31, 2019 at 7:58 p.m.
#6
Hawks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 1,665
Quoting: Isles777
realistically mcdavid would cost you Dach, kane, Strome , boqvist, and a 1st


Quoting: yikes
Realistically it would close.

Kane
Dach
Boqvist
Unprotected 1st

But oilers would still decline


Would you both mind explaining how you came to your respective trades? I might have my numbers wrong but in the last 5 seasons, Connor McDavid has put up 395 points and Patrick Kane has put up 390 points. Putting their ages aside for the moment, a McDavid for Kane straight up would yield you similar offensive results over the course of a season. Now, adding in that Kane is 9 years older than McJesus and is 30 years old definitely means a 1:1 trade EDM loses big time. But I'm unsure how adding Dach, Boker, and another 1st evens this out. I feel like it lopsides this trade in EDM favor. You're giving an almost identical offensive output player plus #3 overall, #8 overall, and another probably top 10 overall player for McJesus. Seems to me an overpayment but I'm interested in your perspective. Thanks.
ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 31, 2019 at 8:22 p.m.
#7
Log off the internet
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 7,830
Likes: 3,866
when Seabrook is the 1st piece going back
Oct. 31, 2019 at 8:35 p.m.
#8
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,072
Likes: 12,828
Quoting: Jco5ta5
Would you both mind explaining how you came to your respective trades? I might have my numbers wrong but in the last 5 seasons, Connor McDavid has put up 395 points and Patrick Kane has put up 390 points. Putting their ages aside for the moment, a McDavid for Kane straight up would yield you similar offensive results over the course of a season. Now, adding in that Kane is 9 years older than McJesus and is 30 years old definitely means a 1:1 trade EDM loses big time. But I'm unsure how adding Dach, Boker, and another 1st evens this out. I feel like it lopsides this trade in EDM favor. You're giving an almost identical offensive output player plus #3 overall, #8 overall, and another probably top 10 overall player for McJesus. Seems to me an overpayment but I'm interested in your perspective. Thanks.


First age should be co spidered lol. That’s is the whole point. We’re considering a trade. So age; huge. Second I truly believe Kane is a top 5 player in the league especially using last year and I’m a big fan of his, but mcdavid is Much more impactful with a lot of room to grow; this kid can get better let’s take that in. Thirdly; position. Centres have a lot more value and when trading a 1C with the addition of him being the best player in the league means I would need to be blown away. As Dach, and Boqvist for me would put me over the hill plus the first; I would accept it if I was looking to move mcdavid (which I would almost never do). That is why you would need to blow Holland away with an offer. Finally; it’s a small point but this would make the oilers have no 1C. Drai is better suited on the winger clearly and RNH could be 1C but then their depth is shot.
Oct. 31, 2019 at 11:16 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,678
Likes: 12,025
Quoting: Isles777
realistically mcdavid would cost you Dach, kane, Strome , boqvist, and a 1st


I agree but at that price it's no longer worth it.
Nov. 1, 2019 at 12:08 a.m.
#10
No regretzkys
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 807
Likes: 389
Quoting: ChiHawk
Realistically no he wouldn't


Lol are you nuts? Yes. That would be the cost 100%. May not even be enough for Mcdavid.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll