SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boston with Hall Year 2

Created by: AlphaHockey65
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 5, 2019
Published: Nov. 5, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,650,000
2$1,375,000
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$10,750,000
8$8,000,000
2$2,500,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,875,000
Trades
BOS
    2018-19 trade for hall
    NJD
    1. Backes, David
    2. 2020 1st round pick (BOS)
    3. 2021 1st round pick (BOS)
    4. 2022 2nd round pick (BOS)
    Additional Details:
    Zboril
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    2021
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    2022
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$83,500,000$84,100,056$964,222$425,000-$600,056
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,125,000$6,125,000
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    C
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,666,667$6,666,667
    RW
    UFA - 3
    $10,750,000$10,750,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $7,250,000$7,250,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $2,800,000$2,800,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $3,650,000$3,650,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,275,000$1,275,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $975,000$975,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $975,000$975,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $850,000$850,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1
    $1,875,000$1,875,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $4,900,000$4,900,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $2,850,000$2,850,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,375,000$1,375,000
    LD
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
    LD/RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $800,000$800,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 3

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Nov. 5, 2019 at 1:46 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 2,851
    Likes: 639
    Bergeron, Marchand and Pastrnak all request a trade if they hand a 28 year old with one 30 goal season 7x10.75.



    Grzelcyk is getting 4-5m for 4 years
    They would be insane to offer that contract to Krug. He will be 36 when his contract expires.

    Seriously - You have a 36 year old Hall making 10.75 & 36 year old Krug Making 8m - these deals might destroy the franchise.
    Nov. 5, 2019 at 1:54 p.m.
    #2
    Bcarlo25
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 21,063
    Likes: 6,967
    I’ll start by saying I still think the trade is a bad one for the bruins, and then go from top to bottom.
    1. Debrusk: That deal walks him directly to UFA without buying out any UFA years. Hard no.
    2. Grzelcyk probably gets 5 million, and at least 4 years. This is a joke.
    3. Why would any prospect sign a three year deal around league minimum? Also, why would the bruins sign a guy they might not even qualify to such a deal? Makes no sense.
    4. No way Bjork signs 3 years at such small money. 1 year? Sure. 3? Not a shot.
    5. See above.
    6. Way too much money.
    7. Either too much term, or too much money. He’s not getting that in boston.
    8. Halak. Sure, why not.
    9. Chara. Sure, why not.
    10. Nieto. Why?
    Nov. 5, 2019 at 11:36 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 19,769
    Likes: 8,826
    Made the team worse, did not fix the holes, created new ones. shakes head
    Nov. 6, 2019 at 10:11 a.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2017
    Posts: 564
    Likes: 155
    Quoting: Propeller09
    Bergeron, Marchand and Pastrnak all request a trade if they hand a 28 year old with one 30 goal season 7x10.75.



    Grzelcyk is getting 4-5m for 4 years
    They would be insane to offer that contract to Krug. He will be 36 when his contract expires.

    Seriously - You have a 36 year old Hall making 10.75 & 36 year old Krug Making 8m - these deals might destroy the franchise.


    Lol what. Why would they request a trade...
    You have a window of 1-3 years with Bergeron.
    Might as well go all in.
    Nov. 6, 2019 at 10:14 a.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2017
    Posts: 564
    Likes: 155
    Quoting: Bcarlo25
    I’ll start by saying I still think the trade is a bad one for the bruins, and then go from top to bottom.
    1. Debrusk: That deal walks him directly to UFA without buying out any UFA years. Hard no.
    2. Grzelcyk probably gets 5 million, and at least 4 years. This is a joke.
    3. Why would any prospect sign a three year deal around league minimum? Also, why would the bruins sign a guy they might not even qualify to such a deal? Makes no sense.
    4. No way Bjork signs 3 years at such small money. 1 year? Sure. 3? Not a shot.
    5. See above.
    6. Way too much money.
    7. Either too much term, or too much money. He’s not getting that in boston.
    8. Halak. Sure, why not.
    9. Chara. Sure, why not.
    10. Nieto. Why?


    Grzelcyk $5 mil?? I'd be shocked if that happened. He's still an RFA. Maybe $2-3 max on a short term deal.
    Hell, McAvoy got $4.9 as an RFA.

    The only guy I see asking $5+ mil is Coyle and that's why I did not resign him.
    Nov. 6, 2019 at 10:15 a.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2017
    Posts: 564
    Likes: 155
    Quoting: Gofnut999
    Made the team worse, did not fix the holes, created new ones. shakes head


    You are literally 11-2-2 with one line scoring goals....
    The Bruins would be even better if that 2nd line started scoring as well.
    Nov. 6, 2019 at 10:20 a.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 19,769
    Likes: 8,826
    Edited Nov. 6, 2019 at 10:32 a.m.
    Quoting: vic997
    You are literally 11-2-2 with one line scoring goals....
    The Bruins would be even better if that 2nd line started scoring as well.


    The second line needs a RW. We have a 25-30 goal score on LW. LW is one of the deepest positions on the Bruins. Adding another does not improve the team. And in this scenario they got weaker at C whike not fixing the RW problem. Over the cap. And Grizz gets triple that anyway.

    Adding Hall for this year is a bad idea. Adding him long term is even worse.

    You don’t “fix” a strength. Fix the problem....RW.
    Nov. 6, 2019 at 11:07 a.m.
    #8
    Bcarlo25
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 21,063
    Likes: 6,967
    Quoting: vic997
    Grzelcyk $5 mil?? I'd be shocked if that happened. He's still an RFA. Maybe $2-3 max on a short term deal.
    Hell, McAvoy got $4.9 as an RFA.

    The only guy I see asking $5+ mil is Coyle and that's why I did not resign him.


    McAvoy was a group 1 RFA coming off his entry. Grzelcyk is much closer to UFA, and is group 2. He's actually allowed to talk to, or even sign with other teams in RFA. McAvoy wasn't. I don't think you know who he is, other than "that undersized guy taht plays for the bruins." He spends time on the top pair. He was paired with McAvoy for the majority of the game last night. 20 minutes. not that i buy into that crap but his advanced stats last year were off the charts. If they want him with any sort of term, he's getting 5 million. 2 million is an absolute joke.
    Propeller09 liked this.
    Nov. 6, 2019 at 11:39 a.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 2,851
    Likes: 639
    Quoting: vic997
    Lol what. Why would they request a trade...
    You have a window of 1-3 years with Bergeron.
    Might as well go all in.


    Because it completely goes against why they all took much less money. Paying a guy who you yourself have on the second line just about twice as much as your 1st line is not a good look.

    Hall isn't that good. They weren't willing to blow up the structure for Tavares, they certainly are not going to do it for a guy who A) has one 30 goal season B) Cannot stay healthy.

    You cannot justify paying Hall more than Bergeron, Marchand or Pastrnak.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll