SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Thoughts On Mike Babcock

Created by: AnalyticsGeek
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 20, 2019
Published: Nov. 20, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I think Mike Babcock was the man to blame for the poor performance of his players. However, I don't think that he is a bad coach. The way he coached just doesn't suit this Leafs team. Mike wanted them to adapt to a heavy grinder style that waits for opponents to mess up. Today’s NHL is attack using north-south speed with d men pinching. Babcock is still looking at the late 90s early 2000s kind of hockey even though the team is not constructed to play that way.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$81,327,699$0$0$172,301
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,893,000$10,893,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 20, 2019 at 7:05 p.m.
#1
i hope ur hungry now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 978
The babclock has expired
Nov. 20, 2019 at 7:05 p.m.
#2
Math and Sports
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 650
Likes: 162
ACGM: Babcock is not a bad coach.

Also ACGM: Proceeds to give explanation of how Babcock is an outdated coach still living in the 90's and is thereby a bad coach.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 7:09 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: SpaghettiPasta
The babclock has expired


Good one.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 7:09 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: TheCelt
ACGM: Babcock is not a bad coach.

Also ACGM: Proceeds to give explanation of how Babcock is an outdated coach still living in the 90's and is thereby a bad coach.


Well, just because his coaching style is outdated doesn't mean he's bad overall. I mean, he still won a lot of silverware before this era.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 7:29 p.m.
#5
Habs4life
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 344
Likes: 37
Funny he was coaching well when Lou was the G.M. They turned the team around pretty quickly.

Now he needs to go. hmmm.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 7:34 p.m.
#6
Pens Rule!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 262
Likes: 26
Quoting: MikeyThePensFan
Well, just because his coaching style is outdated doesn't mean he's bad overall. I mean, he still won a lot of silverware before this era.


The Islanders have no problem with that style of play. Run and gun works best when you have highly skilled players like the Leafs and Pens. They still have to play sound defense to win.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 7:44 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: Captain_Koivu_
Funny he was coaching well when Lou was the G.M. They turned the team around pretty quickly.

Now he needs to go. hmmm.


Babcock and Lou had a great working relationship. Lou supported the way Babs wanted to coach and he brought in the players for it.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 7:46 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: coffey77
The Islanders have no problem with that style of play. Run and gun works best when you have highly skilled players like the Leafs and Pens. They still have to play sound defense to win.


One issue is no defence, another is no forecheck or urgency away from the puck. No speed either.
BOLTLOVER1 liked this.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 8:00 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 938
Likes: 253
People repeat the same bits all over the place on social media: Babcock played a defensive style, Babcock wants a system where players wait for opponents to mess up, Babcock believed in an outdated style of play.

Not the case. It's the opposite. Babcock always preached an offensive style. He's the one who introduced the trademark North-South stretch pass system we used all these years, with Gardiner at QB. His "defensive system" had nothing conventional. He wanted players to put intense pressure along the boards to regain possession (read: puck chasing), by outnumbering the puck carrier, with the hope of generating fast counter-attacks. Instead of a more conservative, positional play.

We are the second worst defensive team in the league! If Babcock taught a defensive style, we would lose games 2-1. Not the case. The problem is, the defensive system was lacking in the first place, and he couldn't find a solution to it this year.

My guess: this run and gun system, with intense pressure on puck carriers, worked in the past because the lineup was more balanced. And we had players who had been trained with that system for years. They knew Gardiner would reach them with a pass if they cheated. Change the lineup, and new players are not used to that. They don't know where to go, make errors, which leads to silly looking goals.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 8:19 p.m.
#10
BOLT LOVER
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 358
Not going to change.. Toronto worst 11 to 20 players in NHL outside of Ottawa .. I mean awful on D and the talented prima Donna's on top lines are girlie girlies.. team needs an enima.. coach always first to go .. question is Nylander or Matthew's next or the GM?
Nov. 20, 2019 at 8:30 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 1,540
Quoting: leaflet
People repeat the same bits all over the place on social media: Babcock played a defensive style, Babcock wants a system where players wait for opponents to mess up, Babcock believed in an outdated style of play.

Not the case. It's the opposite. Babcock always preached an offensive style. He's the one who introduced the trademark North-South stretch pass system we used all these years, with Gardiner at QB. His "defensive system" had nothing conventional. He wanted players to put intense pressure along the boards to regain possession (read: puck chasing), by outnumbering the puck carrier, with the hope of generating fast counter-attacks. Instead of a more conservative, positional play.

We are the second worst defensive team in the league! If Babcock taught a defensive style, we would lose games 2-1. Not the case. The problem is, the defensive system was lacking in the first place, and he couldn't find a solution to it this year.

My guess: this run and gun system, with intense pressure on puck carriers, worked in the past because the lineup was more balanced. And we had players who had been trained with that system for years. They knew Gardiner would reach them with a pass if they cheated. Change the lineup, and new players are not used to that. They don't know where to go, make errors, which leads to silly looking goals.


That's a pretty solid assessment, I think. I was of the thinking that he handcuffed the strength of team in favour of defense play. But your take makes alot of sense . They look lost out there so much this year. It'll be interesting to see how they look witt with Keefe in place
leaflet liked this.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 10:36 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 938
Likes: 253
Quoting: blowing_the_zone
That's a pretty solid assessment, I think. I was of the thinking that he handcuffed the strength of team in favour of defense play. But your take makes alot of sense . They look lost out there so much this year. It'll be interesting to see how they look witt with Keefe in place


Thanks! The change will help, I'm sure. Keefe is a mystery to me, but players needed someone new behind the bench.

My quibble with Babcock was that, ironically maybe, he was not conventional enough. Most coaches would cut their bench if trailing in the third period. They would play Matthews 20 minutes or more. They would have tried Barrie on the first PP if things didn't work for 10 games. I think I would have been happy with any "normal" NHL coach at this point.
blowing_the_zone liked this.
Nov. 21, 2019 at 12:10 a.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
teams have to pick an identity and stick with it.
If you are going to be a speed team and you want to add physicality to it, then you need to find those bigger faster players who can do that.
TOR really didn't do that. But that isn't the biggest issue here. The biggest issue is the defense sucks. They don't have a true #1 pair on the team, and that's where it starts.
Nov. 21, 2019 at 7:48 p.m.
#14
Pens Rule!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 262
Likes: 26
Quoting: MikeyThePensFan
One issue is no defence, another is no forecheck or urgency away from the puck. No speed either.


So your saying they suck.smirk
Nov. 21, 2019 at 8:47 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: leaflet
People repeat the same bits all over the place on social media: Babcock played a defensive style, Babcock wants a system where players wait for opponents to mess up, Babcock believed in an outdated style of play.

Not the case. It's the opposite. Babcock always preached an offensive style. He's the one who introduced the trademark North-South stretch pass system we used all these years, with Gardiner at QB. His "defensive system" had nothing conventional. He wanted players to put intense pressure along the boards to regain possession (read: puck chasing), by outnumbering the puck carrier, with the hope of generating fast counter-attacks. Instead of a more conservative, positional play.

We are the second worst defensive team in the league! If Babcock taught a defensive style, we would lose games 2-1. Not the case. The problem is, the defensive system was lacking in the first place, and he couldn't find a solution to it this year.

My guess: this run and gun system, with intense pressure on puck carriers, worked in the past because the lineup was more balanced. And we had players who had been trained with that system for years. They knew Gardiner would reach them with a pass if they cheated. Change the lineup, and new players are not used to that. They don't know where to go, make errors, which leads to silly looking goals.


Well, I think Babcock wanted to play with north-south speed system when he first started to coach following the draft lottery in 2016/17, but after their 1st round loss to the Bruins in 2017/18, he decided to play a more physical system which didn't suit the players. He thought the issue was his players weren't tough enough, even though the real issue was that the defence wasn't good enough and therefore he never fixed it.
Nov. 21, 2019 at 8:51 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: pharrow
teams have to pick an identity and stick with it.
If you are going to be a speed team and you want to add physicality to it, then you need to find those bigger faster players who can do that.
TOR really didn't do that. But that isn't the biggest issue here. The biggest issue is the defense sucks. They don't have a true #1 pair on the team, and that's where it starts.


Yeah what I felt was that Babcock changed the team's identity even though the biggest issue was the defence that he never bothered fixing.
Nov. 21, 2019 at 8:51 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: coffey77
So your saying they suck.smirk


Given the way this Leafs team has played, they are a lottery team.
Nov. 21, 2019 at 10:34 p.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: MikeyThePensFan
Yeah what I felt was that Babcock changed the team's identity even though the biggest issue was the defence that he never bothered fixing.


It's not babcock's job to fix the defense. That's on the GM. He's the guy who does the contracts. At the end of the day if GMJR brings in the wrong guys the coach gets scapegoated but it's the GM's fault.
Same is true with Babs. I'm sure there is more to that whole situation than what is public but there is also no doubt that they ran rug-shot all over Dubas.
But they get to rebuild that defense in the off season, 5 of them are FA. They can go from there.
Nov. 22, 2019 at 9:22 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: pharrow
It's not babcock's job to fix the defense. That's on the GM. He's the guy who does the contracts. At the end of the day if GMJR brings in the wrong guys the coach gets scapegoated but it's the GM's fault.
Same is true with Babs. I'm sure there is more to that whole situation than what is public but there is also no doubt that they ran rug-shot all over Dubas.
But they get to rebuild that defense in the off season, 5 of them are FA. They can go from there.


You're right actually, I agree. If the Leafs were losing games by a score of 1-2 every night, then blame the coach for not able to generate any offence. However, they're giving up 5-6 goals a game, you have to think there's pressure on the GM for bringing in guys like Ceci and Barrie who can't play defence. Babcock has actually done a good job developing Rielly, Dermott and Holl to improve their defensive game.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll