Forums/NHL Signings

Boston Bruins signed Charlie Coyle (6 Years / $5,250,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options

 

Nov 27, 2019 at 4:48
#1
Charlie Coyle has signed a new contract with the Boston Bruins.
STANDARD CONTRACT (EXTENSION)
COMPARE THIS CONTRACT
LENGTH: 6 YEARS
EXPIRY STATUS: UFA
SIGNING TEAM: Boston BruinsBoston Bruins
VALUE: $31,500,000
C.H.% : 6.44
SIGNING DATE: November 27, 2019
SOURCE: CapFriendly
SEASONCLAUSECAP HIT AAV P. BONUSES S. BONUSES BASE SALARY TOTAL SALARY MINORS SALARY
2020-21Modified NTC, NMC$5,250,000$5,250,000$0$0$8,000,000$8,000,000$8,000,000
2021-22Modified NTC, NMC$5,250,000$5,250,000$0$0$6,000,000$6,000,000$6,000,000
2022-23Modified NTC, NMC$5,250,000$5,250,000$0$1,000,000$3,000,000$4,000,000$4,000,000
2023-24Modified NTC, NMC$5,250,000$5,250,000$0$0$4,500,000$4,500,000$4,500,000
2024-25Modified NTC, NMC$5,250,000$5,250,000$0$0$4,500,000$4,500,000$4,500,000
2025-26Modified NTC, NMC$5,250,000$5,250,000$0$0$4,500,000$4,500,000$4,500,000
TOTAL$31,500,000$31,500,000$0$1,000,000$30,500,000$31,500,000$31,500,000
CLAUSE DETAILS: 2020-22: Player submits a 10 team no trade list; 2022-25: Player submits an 8 team no trade list; 2025-26: Player submits a 3 team no trade list
Nov 27, 2019 at 4:50
#2
bhavikp27
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 554
Great deal. Coyle has been the perfect fit for the Bruins, last playoffs and now. And he's only 27 so maybe his contract will end just in time if he starts regressing
KennyBoi, SpaghettiPasta, MoreOfAnIslesGuy and 1 other person liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 4:51
#3
Marner Kermit Fetish
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 399
big oof for the bruins. 6 years of that is atrocious
Boubou79, BlueSeeker, PrisonBull and 1 other person liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 4:53
#4
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,540
Likes: 1,156
Great contract for the Bruins. He’s very versatile and brings a lot to the team. Maybe a year or two too long, but the cap hit certainly makes up for it.
bhavikp27 liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 4:54
#5
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 85
Likes: 22
He's playing good now but paying Coyle 5.25 until he's 34 is rough.
CD282 and Boubou79 liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 4:57
#6
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,998
Likes: 1,960
David Clarkson money
Laquille, weirfanno1, SpaghettiPasta and 5 others liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 5:07
#7
The evil stats guy
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 1,922
Edited Nov 27, 2019 at 5:13
My initial reaction was that this was too much money for a 3C, but honestly this is the going rate these days (albeit the top end of that rate). Maybe a little high for him but not by much (750k overpay /year at the absolute most). My only issue with the deal is the term. If you are going to pay a 3C that kind of money at his age, lower the term. 4 years would have been much better (Think something similar to the Bozak deal for STL).

I think I am going to say no to this mostly because of those two extra years, but other than that it isn't a crazy deal.
Ville__Koho liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 5:19
#8
HonestHockeyNYI
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 79
Likes: 33
Is his production as of late even worth $5.25M AAV?
Nov 27, 2019 at 5:19
#9
No regretzkys
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 234
Likes: 86
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Great contract for the Bruins. He’s very versatile and brings a lot to the team. Maybe a year or two too long, but the cap hit certainly makes up for it.


There is no way this a great contract...

There is a chance that this contract could be ok, but it won't ever be a steal.

High risk, medium reward is what I see here
CD282 and Boubou79 liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 5:23
#10
McGruff
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 235
Likes: 50
Edited Nov 27, 2019 at 5:45
Good moves by Sweeney for CC (& Wagner). It's called getting in front of the parade and leading the pack instead of being a dumb clown on the float in the middle or end of the pack.

Coyle has begun to fit in nicely as he gets more games in the B's system (think "Mr. Versatile"). On pace for 45 points this year, played the point on the PP last night and can move into "1stC or 2ndC hole" and be effective (eg: Bergy goes down and he's next man up). In two years, Krejci is unlikely too be re-signed (at least at >US$7M, just my opinion, I like DK, maybe he takes a hometown discount?). That said, Coyle would then be positioned as #2C regular maybe and he'll be 3.5 years a Bruin by then...
Bruins now have 15 guys signed for next year too. Key signings left = UFA Krug, RFA Debrusk, RFA Grizz, UFA Halak...(Chara?)
Sweeney's favourite song = "The Beat Goes On Baby...."
KennyBoi liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 5:36
#11
Go Jets Go!!
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 83
Likes: 74
Eeeks in a few years from now
Boubou79 liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 5:59
#12
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 160
Likes: 305
Let's not forget to credit Ryan "Ray" Whitney for breaking this and the Wagner signing.
lublowri liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 6:17
#13
AwesomeMatthews
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 715
Likes: 547
To much money
Boubou79 liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 6:48
#14
Formerly klondikebar
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 1,698
So Mikael Granlund is getting 8 mil for 7 years then???
Wqrrior, CD282 and Boubou79 liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 7:04
#15
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 1,305
I hope they enjoy another Backes contract in 3-4 years.
CD282 and Boubou79 liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 7:08
#16
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 450
Likes: 63
Great contract for someone who will be the B's next 2C when krech gets traded/let go, and will see an increase in point production with the promotion. Very versatile, can play up and down the lineup. Sweeney proving why he's GM of the year. At least now the B's have some stability down the middle after the bergy/krech era.
Nov 27, 2019 at 7:19
#17
Wqrrior
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 461
Quoting: Random2152
My initial reaction was that this was too much money for a 3C, but honestly this is the going rate these days (albeit the top end of that rate). Maybe a little high for him but not by much (750k overpay /year at the absolute most). My only issue with the deal is the term. If you are going to pay a 3C that kind of money at his age, lower the term. 4 years would have been much better (Think something similar to the Bozak deal for STL).

I think I am going to say no to this mostly because of those two extra years, but other than that it isn't a crazy deal.


I think Coyle in many ways is comparable to Konecny on PHI, who also got a similar contract. Konecny was boosted by top 6 minutes to get higher production, and Coyle has been restricted to the middle six, thus the comparable if given identical minutes and usage is alright. Konecny though took his contract and expanded on it because he is still young - I can't see Coyle doing the same.

Thus I am agreement that this should have more mirrored the Bozak deal, and does not look good at this term.
Still, it's probably better than going at the minimum availability centers and RW in free agency and probably will be looked at on as a "win"
Nov 27, 2019 at 7:19
#18
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 450
Likes: 63
Quoting: HabsForEver
I hope they enjoy another Backes contract in 3-4 years.


well the difference here is that backes was signed when he was 31. Coyle is only 27 (will be 28 when contract starts) so the production technically shouldn't fall off as early as it did in backes' case (when he became 33). Let's say Coyle is on the same trajectory to fall off, so that's 5yrs of good production and only 1 yr of dead money, as opposed to 3 yrs of dead money in backes' case.
HabsForEver liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 7:23
#19
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 1,305
Quoting: KennyBoi
well the difference here is that backes was signed when he was 31. Coyle is only 27 (will be 28 when contract starts) so the production technically shouldn't fall off as early as it did in backes' case (when he became 33). Let's say Coyle is on the same trajectory to fall off, so that's 5yrs of good production and only 1 yr of dead money, as opposed to 3 yrs of dead money in backes' case.


I guess that's a good, but I don't think Coyle deserves that money in the first place. It's already 500,000-1,000,000 overpaid before you even factor in regression
Nov 27, 2019 at 8:46
#20
BtZ's buttercup
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 1,851
Slightly high on money and way too much term IMO.
So Krug is gone right?
Brian2016 and Boubou79 liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 9:52
#21
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 777
Quoting: HabsForEver
I hope they enjoy another Backes contract in 3-4 years.


Exactly what I was thinking. I think BOS will be very fortunate if Coyle plays at his current level for 4 years.
Trickster and Boubou79 liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 9:54
#22
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 777
Quoting: Trickster
Slightly high on money and way too much term IMO.
So Krug is gone right?


If Krug is gone they'll need to replace him with either a trade or another UFA Defenseman. Nobody in house is capable of running the PP like Krug, or even close to Krug.
Trickster and Boubou79 liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 10:01
#23
BtZ's buttercup
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 1,851
Quoting: Brian2016
If Krug is gone they'll need to replace him with either a trade or another UFA Defenseman. Nobody in house is capable of running the PP like Krug, or even close to Krug.


Agreed, maybe give assets and move Backes to resign Krug?
Brian2016, Boubou79 and Earfgang liked this.
Nov 27, 2019 at 10:07
#24
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 777
Quoting: Trickster
Agreed, maybe give assets and move Backes to resign Krug?


I know they'd absolutely hate to pay big just to save cap space, but it'll be worth it to keep the Cup window wide open.
Nov 27, 2019 at 10:55
#25
Hawks and Isles Fan
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 579
They’re definitely lucky to have him going forward, Coyle is an excellent player. Will he be excellent for another 6 years? I’m not so sure
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit