SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hear me out

Created by: RalphMac
Team: 2019-20 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 30, 2019
Published: Nov. 30, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
What if we buy, or at least acquire talent now? Wild are rolling right now, and the blues were midseason last place and won it all. Why are we just trashing this team? I dont have any trades in mind, but interested in anyone has thoughts on what wild could do IF they were to be a buyer rather than a seller
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2021
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$73,421,091$0$1,232,500$8,078,909
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,625,000$1,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$916,666$916,666 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,487,500$1,487,500
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,187,500$5,187,500
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$767,500$767,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,166,667$4,166,667
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$785,000$785,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,875,000$2,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,166,667$2,166,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 30, 2019 at 11:14 a.m.
#1
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,916
Likes: 2,487
Only way wild could buy NHL level talent is trading away prospects and draft picks. Kaprizov and Boldy would fetch a nice return. If Wild did this they probably still wouldn't be good enough to win a cup. Put some potential trades out there and see what people are willing to give up.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Nov. 30, 2019 at 11:19 a.m.
#2
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,628
Likes: 12,355
Go all in or tear it down as much as possible, this staggering along as is isn't gonna get this team anywhere.
OutCold13 liked this.
Nov. 30, 2019 at 11:35 a.m.
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,038
If you're going to be a buyer, you have to have surplus assets to offer (if they're not surplus, it's difficult to make anything more than a lateral trade). For example, without passing on their value, Buffalo has an excess of RD and Anaheim has an extra young LD (Jacob Larsson, Brendan Guhle, Josh Mahura). I don't see anything "extra" on your team other than a surplus of middle-six forwards, all of whom are left-handed at that, which seems to me to restrict your possibilities. Furthermore, forward is where your need is, because you have a strong defense set through next season and goaltending hasn't really lost you a significant number of games even with Dubnyk underperforming. And other than Chris Kreider (yet another leftie), I don't see anyone on the horizon that might make a significant difference for you even though I've suggested a trade with Pittsburgh for homeboy Nick Bjugstad (based more on the Penguins' cap needs than anything else) a couple of times. Maybe some dice rolls like Ho-Sang or Puljujarvi might bear unexpected fruit, but they're risky.
OutCold13 liked this.
Nov. 30, 2019 at 11:38 a.m.
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,038
Quoting: Paul13
Only way wild could buy NHL level talent is trading away prospects and draft picks. Kaprizov and Boldy would fetch a nice return. If Wild did this they probably still wouldn't be good enough to win a cup. Put some potential trades out there and see what people are willing to give up.

I hope the thought of trading Boldy or Kaprizov makes you shiver as much as the thought of trading Zegras or Lundestrom or Comtois or Tracey does me.
Nov. 30, 2019 at 11:43 a.m.
#5
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,916
Likes: 2,487
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I hope the thought of trading Boldy or Kaprizov makes you shiver as much as the thought of trading Zegras or Lundestrom or Comtois or Tracey does me.


Yes it does. Unfortunately the Wilds prospect pool is pretty shallow. Most of the other prospects would probably fetch 3rd line talent at best.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Nov. 30, 2019 at 11:46 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
RalphMac
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 114
Likes: 22
Quoting: Paul13
Yes it does. Unfortunately the Wilds prospect pool is pretty shallow. Most of the other prospects would probably fetch 3rd line talent at best.


Oh I totally agree. The majority of our prospect pool are bottom 6 potential players (minus the likes of kaprisov and boldy), but Wild have made stagnant moves for the longest time and i feel a risk has to be taken at some point
OutCold13 liked this.
Nov. 30, 2019 at 11:53 a.m.
#7
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,916
Likes: 2,487
Quoting: RalphMac
Oh I totally agree. The majority of our prospect pool are bottom 6 potential players (minus the likes of kaprisov and boldy), but Wild have made stagnant moves for the longest time and i feel a risk has to be taken at some point


We have a few prospects with better than bottom 6 potential but they are not far enough along to get top 6 return.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Nov. 30, 2019 at 11:53 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,252
Likes: 19,514
Blues are different, on paper their team was packed full of talent and should have been winning all season, it was legitimately a goalie difference. Minnesota is a team with some talent yes, but they are also a team that has a lot of older contracts. It should be noted that the only team the Wild beat of recent that are actually a legitimate playoff team is Colorado, who us quite injured right now.
Nov. 30, 2019 at 12:06 p.m.
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,038
Quoting: RalphMac
Oh I totally agree. The majority of our prospect pool are bottom 6 potential players (minus the likes of kaprisov and boldy), but Wild have made stagnant moves for the longest time and i feel a risk has to be taken at some point


Like Filip Forsberg for Martin Erat?
Nov. 30, 2019 at 1:18 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 651
Likes: 250
I mean honestly, no one should ever assume their team is gonna do what the Blues did last year. It was magical and amazing, but remember they were the dark horse candidate in the preseason to make the Cup Finals. So it wasn’t like it was unbelievable that the talent finally meshed.

As for the Wild, I would go full on sell mode and work on dealing anything with value over 25 years old I’d ship out and maintain just a few vets for development sake. This is supposed to be a good draft so I’d take as many picks as I could get my hands on plus futures who are a year or two out.
MNBassman liked this.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 9:08 a.m.
#11
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,141
Likes: 3,571
It won’t surprise me one bit when/if the Wild talk themselves into being buyers at the deadline this year... They have spent the better part of 20 years borrowing from their future to build a decent team for today and have literally nothing to show for it but yet another decent team and a prospect cupboard that is barren. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll