SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Odd Leafs Question

Created by: exo2769
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 4, 2019
Published: Dec. 4, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Let's just assume that the CAR trade is accepted. The point of this post isn't the valuing the CAR trade whether or not it's too much or not enough...blah blah blah

What would would it take in a trade for the MAIN piece to simply be dropping the top 10 protection? It's obviously a no brainer if you think TOR is 100% playoff bound because that means either of these trades are essentially free. BUT there's a very small chance (16% as of today) that you're giving up a HUGE piece.

How much do you believe in your own team...just to MAKE the playoffs?
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2020 1st round pick (TOR)
2.
CHI
  1. Holl, Justin
Additional Details:
Removing the top 10 protection. It's a gamble, but statistically speaking might be the best trade you can get...no?

Even now, there's only a 16% chance at a top 3 pick.
TOR
  1. Gustafsson, Erik ($600,000 retained)
3.
CHI
  1. Ceci, Cody
Additional Details:
Removal of top 10 protection.

It's an either or trade. Just curious.
TOR
  1. Crawford, Corey ($3,000,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$69,151,686$0$6,920,000$12,348,314
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 4, 2019 at 3:05 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 344
I’ll take Crawford for ceci rn. We could call lilgren up. Holl for gus ah I wouldn’t mind it
Dec. 4, 2019 at 3:06 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,595
Likes: 9,676
Quoting: Leafs_fan13
I’ll take Crawford for ceci rn. We could call lilgren up. Holl for gus ah I wouldn’t mind it


So you'd drop the top 10 protection of your 2020 1st round pick for BOTH of these trades?
Dec. 4, 2019 at 3:09 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 344
Quoting: exo2769
So you'd drop the top 10 protection of your 2020 1st round pick for BOTH of these trades?


I would
exo2769 and GenXHockey liked this.
Dec. 4, 2019 at 3:20 p.m.
#4
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,156
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Leafs_fan13
I would


Yup, I think that may work, provided sandin is called up.
exo2769 liked this.
Dec. 4, 2019 at 3:45 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 656
I really like the concept of this deal, but I'd only make it at the deadline if Toronto is hovering around 10th place. Obviously if they are in the playoffs by then we shouldn't do it, or even if they're right on the bubble since it isn't worth giving up valuable assets just for 3% lottery odds. But if we do get their pick and they're close, I think this could be a good gamble to make.
exo2769 liked this.
Dec. 4, 2019 at 5:43 p.m.
#6
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,831
Likes: 5,799
Chicago Blackhawks
Leafs 2021 first round pick
(Also means condition on Carolina first is reverted because we have both)
Cody Ceci

Toronto Maple Leafs
Erik Gus
Corey Crawford 50% retained


Otherwise it’s just poor asset management... you are giving up Gus for holl and for a 1/1000000 chance the leafs miss the playoffs, and their pick is top 3 (10)…

Unless I have misunderstood this.
Dec. 5, 2019 at 8:48 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,595
Likes: 9,676
@Stan_Bowman
All I was really trying to do was really ask the question...what would it take to removed the Top 10 Protection on their 2020 1st rounder? It's an extremely subjective and vague question (I understand) considering we're not near the TDL AND it's a complete gamble. It's worth more than future considerations...because why include it at all if it weren't. It's worth Less than...well a lot of things.

The more important part is getting the 1st, but once you have it. (Assumption in this post) I think Stan would have to weigh his options. If for whatever reason he can't get a good return for Gus...This option to me is better than just a 3rd rounder. I'd roll the dice because it's more arrows in the quiver for game changing players.
Dec. 5, 2019 at 11:04 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Certainly a big risk to take with the Attacking Lineup the leafs can put out. Im not so sure I would do it though like you say, as we get closer to the TDL that could change.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll