Quoting: Pmwalker
The Norris trophy has been a joke for years. It disregards most 2 way or defensive guys and just looks at points. There’s been a few Norris trophy winners who flat out can’t defend. Regardless Slavin is a better all around defender than Rielly as stated before. Hence the add.
People on this site don't know how hockey is played, they just read crap on the internet and listen to other fans and think that means they know how good players are. Rielly is one of the best defenceman in the league, after 90% of fans everywhere beyond TO called him bad for years he exploded last year and it couldn't be denied that he was a legit elite #1 defenceman, fast forward 30 games and he's trash and worth a 2nd pair defenceman because according to idiots who don't know how to play hockey, he is really bad defensively. He isn't, he may not be the best defensively but he's not terrible, he's in fact way above average and has had to deal with Ron Hainsey, Nikita Zaitsev and Cody Ceci as his partners for the past 3 seasons. All 3 of those guys are utterly terrible. But that is Rielly's fault probably.
The reality is, Rielly is an elite #1 defenceman that will contend for the Norris for the foreseable future. The Leafs won't move him. Leaf fans that want to move him are idiots and fans from other teams that think they can lowball the Leafs to get Rielly are also idiots.
This is by no means a shot at Slavin, he's absolutely a #1 defenceman and I very much like his game, he's close to Rielly's level but I'll keep Rielly because he's a better puck mover and better skater. The point here is that Rielly is not some low level 2nd pair defenceman that so many on here like to treat. Those people are also idiots.