SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Targetting Manson

Created by: BCAPP
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 7, 2019
Published: Dec. 7, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I've always said to others why would Anaheim trade him. But if it gets to the point where they are throwing in the towel on this season, then he only has 2 years left until UFA. Perhaps they would trade for futures.
Trades
1.
2.
NYR
  1. Moore, Trevor
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (CBJ)
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,114,643$0$202,500$3,385,357
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,893,000$10,893,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$694,444$694,444 (Performance Bonus$70,000$70K)
LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 7, 2019 at 2:15 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
ANA wont trade Manson, he's the only good RHD they have
BCAPP and OldNYIfan liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 2:15 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: GMs
ANA wont trade Manson, he's the only good RHD they have


You're probably right. But I think they're at a point where they should at least trade Getzlaf.

It's full rebuild time
Dec. 7, 2019 at 2:20 p.m.
#3
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,052
Likes: 3,754
I'd do the Ducks trade.

The Rangers one, that is overpayment IMO.
How about 2x 3rd rounders?

I like Moore alot.
oneX and Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 2:27 p.m.
#4
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: BCAPP
You're probably right. But I think they're at a point where they should at least trade Getzlaf.

It's full rebuild time


Why full rebuild?

-They've got one of the top 2 goalies in the NHL (If not top).
-They've got a solid young core that is gaining experience this season (Comtois, Steel, Terry, Mahura, Guhle, Lundestrom), with guys like Olivier-Groulx and Morand coming along.

The Ducks are a top 4 RHD away from being a potential playoff team, and with their cap space next summer, are another piece away from being a scary team in the Pacific. Trading Manson only puts them farther than that away.

As for the return on the trade, there's certainly quantity there, but if they were open to moving Manson, there'd be higher quality offers.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 2:28 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: Trickster
I'd do the Ducks trade.

The Rangers one, that is overpayment IMO.
How about 2x 3rd rounders?

I like Moore alot.


I do too, but gotta give to get
oneX and Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 2:29 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: Lenny7
Why full rebuild?

-They've got one of the top 2 goalies in the NHL (If not top).
-They've got a solid young core that is gaining experience this season (Comtois, Steel, Terry, Mahura, Guhle, Lundestrom), with guys like Olivier-Groulx and Morand coming along.

The Ducks are a top 4 RHD away from being a potential playoff team, and with their cap space next summer, are another piece away from being a scary team in the Pacific. Trading Manson only puts them farther than that away.

As for the return on the trade, there's certainly quantity there, but if they were open to moving Manson, there'd be higher quality offers.


Eh maybe I'm wrong. They do have a top goalie and a great prospect pool.

But I just don't see any good C depth at the NHL level. Getzlaf is past his best before date and Henrique is fine.

If one of their surplus of top forward prospects proves he can be an up and coming 1c I'll change my tune
Trickster and Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 2:34 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Lenny7
Why full rebuild?

-They've got one of the top 2 goalies in the NHL (If not top).
-They've got a solid young core that is gaining experience this season (Comtois, Steel, Terry, Mahura, Guhle, Lundestrom), with guys like Olivier-Groulx and Morand coming along.

The Ducks are a top 4 RHD away from being a potential playoff team, and with their cap space next summer, are another piece away from being a scary team in the Pacific. Trading Manson only puts them farther than that away.

As for the return on the trade, there's certainly quantity there, but if they were open to moving Manson, there'd be higher quality offers.


None of that core is elite. They are good pieces but you need a franchise centre or two. Annahiem needs to move out what they can that is over 26 and start fresh.

Also Manson had one really good year 2 seasons ago and hasn't been blow the doors off at all since then. He's right handed and that makes people on her go wild for him but he's just a good right handed defensive defenceman. Players like him are great to have but they aren't superstars.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 2:38 p.m.
#8
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,052
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: BCAPP
Eh maybe I'm wrong. They do have a top goalie and a great prospect pool.

But I just don't see any good C depth at the NHL level. Getzlaf is past his best before date and Henrique is fine.

If one of their surplus of top forward prospects proves he can be an up and coming 1c I'll change my tune


If Rasanen turns things around, man this trade would be good for Ducks.
Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 2:56 p.m.
#9
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,052
Likes: 3,754
Yo @palhal share some thoughts here please?
Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 2:57 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: Lenny7
Why full rebuild?

-They've got one of the top 2 goalies in the NHL (If not top).
-They've got a solid young core that is gaining experience this season (Comtois, Steel, Terry, Mahura, Guhle, Lundestrom), with guys like Olivier-Groulx and Morand coming along.

The Ducks are a top 4 RHD away from being a potential playoff team, and with their cap space next summer, are another piece away from being a scary team in the Pacific. Trading Manson only puts them farther than that away.

As for the return on the trade, there's certainly quantity there, but if they were open to moving Manson, there'd be higher quality offers.


I do fully admit that it is a lot of good to okay pieces. But Manson is good himself. He isn't a stud or an all star. He just meets Toronto's needs

Essentially Kapanen is worth a late first, Bracco a second, an actual second, and Ransanen was drafted with a late second and I would argue still had that value.

Plus Ceci to make the cap work
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:05 p.m.
#11
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,052
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: BCAPP
I do too, but gotta give to get


Agreed but Georgiev does not have Moore plus 3rd value IMO though.
Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:08 p.m.
#12
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,501
Likes: 22,667
Quoting: Trickster
Yo @palhal share some thoughts here please?


Manson is injured till January and here we go trading Ceci. IMO this season is lost. I'd rather just ride out the season, with Ceci gone (and no Manson) there is some cap space for next year. During the summer it might be necessary to trade Kapanen for cap reason to shore up the defence. But the trade is really Kapanen and a second for two full years of Manson. Ducks need Dman as much as the Leafs do, so I don't know if even doable.
Though I like Georgieuv trade, I wonder what his cap hit is going to be next season and the can Leafs afford him.
Sign_em_up000000 and OldNYIfan liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:21 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: Trickster
I'd do the Ducks trade.

Me too, but I don't think Anaheim does.


The Rangers one, that is overpayment IMO.
How about 2x 3rd rounders?

I like Moore alot.


I like this idea better and I too like Moore more than most (no pun intended).
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:22 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: BCAPP
Eh maybe I'm wrong. They do have a top goalie and a great prospect pool.

But I just don't see any good C depth at the NHL level. Getzlaf is past his best before date and Henrique is fine.

If one of their surplus of top forward prospects proves he can be an up and coming 1c I'll change my tune


I don't think the Ducks are getting enough value here tho.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:23 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: Trickster
If Rasanen turns things around, man this trade would be good for Ducks.


We can hope
Trickster liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:27 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: Trickster
Agreed but Georgiev does not have Moore plus 3rd value IMO though.


That sounds about right to me. A 2nd and Timashov plus Hutch or a couple of 3rds and Hutchinson if they want him should suffice IMO.
Trickster liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:30 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: palhal
Manson is injured till January and here we go trading Ceci. IMO this season is lost. I'd rather just ride out the season, with Ceci gone (and no Manson) there is some cap space for next year. During the summer it might be necessary to trade Kapanen for cap reason to shore up the defence. But the trade is really Kapanen and a second for two full years of Manson. Ducks need Dman as much as the Leafs do, so I don't know if even doable.
Though I like Georgieuv trade, I wonder what his cap hit is going to be next season and the can Leafs afford him.


What do you think about a trade with Columbus
To CBJ
Johnson+Ceci

To TML
Savard+Anderson

Maybe we throw in a pick? Thoughts.... BTW it was BCAPPs idea just giving credit where credit is due.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:30 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 389
Manson isn’t on the trade block unless it’s an overpay by the leafs
BCAPP and Lenny7 liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:30 p.m.
#19
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 2,896
Quoting: BCAPP
I do fully admit that it is a lot of good to okay pieces. But Manson is good himself. He isn't a stud or an all star. He just meets Toronto's needs

Essentially Kapanen is worth a late first, Bracco a second, an actual second, and Ransanen was drafted with a late second and I would argue still had that value.

Plus Ceci to make the cap work


Bracco is not worth a second. A 22 yr old that hasn’t played a second in the nhl isn't worth a second.
palhal, Lenny7 and OldNYIfan liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:39 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: Jah1722
Bracco is not worth a second. A 22 yr old that hasn’t played a second in the nhl isn't worth a second.


Perhaps I'm overeating him. He was second in AHL scoring last year. He remains what he was when drafted. An upside second rounder with low floor. Good scoring playmaker who's undersized
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:40 p.m.
#21
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,501
Likes: 22,667
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
What do you think about a trade with Columbus
To CBJ
Johnson+Ceci

To TML
Savard+Anderson

Maybe we throw in a pick? Thoughts.... BTW it was BCAPPs idea just giving credit where credit is due.


CBJ want to make the playoffs this year. So the trade is two NHLer for one NHLer and an injured NHLer, so CBJ declines. If you look at years of control....Johnsson and Ceci versus Savard and Anderson, CBJ declines.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:42 p.m.
#22
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
None of that core is elite. They are good pieces but you need a franchise centre or two. Annahiem needs to move out what they can that is over 26 and start fresh.

Also Manson had one really good year 2 seasons ago and hasn't been blow the doors off at all since then. He's right handed and that makes people on her go wild for him but he's just a good right handed defensive defenceman. Players like him are great to have but they aren't superstars.


Ok, I'll bite...What you're saying is to rip it apart because they're short on D? Here's a short list of teams with your coveted "franchise centers" that are really, really showing the world how hockey works:

The Leafs have 2 franchise centers, and will struggle to make the playoffs.
The Oilers have 2 franchise centers (granted, one is a winger now, then add RNH), and struggle to make the playoffs (Though they're leading the Pacific today).
The Panthers have what I would consider 2 franchise centers and haven't been making the playoffs.
The Sabres have a franchise center, also haven't been making the playoffs.
The Stars have one, that's went pretty well...

I'm sure I'm missing some obvious ones here, but this was just a quick browse.

The NHL today is all about depth, a strong D core, and being able to run 4 lines. Add a couple of RHD to the Ducks roster, and they have that. Start subtracting and you're wasting prime years of one of the best goalies in the NHL (If not the best).

End of the day, I'm not against trading anyone off of the Ducks, but it's gotta make sense, and this doesn't.
BCAPP and OldNYIfan liked this.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:43 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: palhal
CBJ want to make the playoffs this year. So the trade is two NHLer for one NHLer and an injured NHLer, so CBJ declines. If you look at years of control....Johnsson and Ceci versus Savard and Anderson, CBJ declines.


Actually, in @BCAPP OP he had Kapanen going instead of Johnsson and a CBJ fan told him to switch the two and it would probably be a deal.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:44 p.m.
#24
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,501
Likes: 22,667
Quoting: BCAPP
Perhaps I'm overeating him. He was second in AHL scoring last year. He remains what he was when drafted. An upside second rounder with low floor. Good scoring playmaker who's undersized


You look at top AHL scorers in the past 50 years. Many of them hardly a whiff of the NHL. Just saying scoring stats from AHL, NCAA, Junior, KHL...kinda meaningless.
Bracco had a opportunity in the exhibition games this season to make an impact. I was surprised/disappointed that he couldn't up his game against teams that consisted of NHL/AHL and juniors. Don't wish Bracco any ill luck, but I can't see him having any impact at all in the NHL.
Dec. 7, 2019 at 3:53 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: palhal
You look at top AHL scorers in the past 50 years. Many of them hardly a whiff of the NHL. Just saying scoring stats from AHL, NCAA, Junior, KHL...kinda meaningless.
Bracco had a opportunity in the exhibition games this season to make an impact. I was surprised/disappointed that he couldn't up his game against teams that consisted of NHL/AHL and juniors. Don't wish Bracco any ill luck, but I can't see him having any impact at all in the NHL.


If you look at top AHL scorers under 24 though the list looks a lot better.

I am not saying he is a stud. I'm saying he is more or less the same value as when he was drafted. A 50something pick
Trickster and Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll