SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Possible move to dump Backes

Created by: bigbrit93
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 9, 2019
Published: Dec. 9, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I know Toffoli has been beaten to death on here, but I think he would be a solid 2RW that solidifies the top 6 for the Bs. I went with what I felt was a fair price, NHL D-man- high prospect who's progressing and getting close to NHL readiness, and a 2nd round pick.

My next move was purely for cap. I tried looking in to Gaborik's injury, but didn't find anything newer than last year when he was still seeing a back specialist in LA. My thought process here is that the Bs get an immediate 1.2 extra cap space, while the Sens get a leadership guy who can still play (when healthy). This trade is solely based on thinking that Gaborik is on LTIR and basically it's only his contract being traded, and that he most likely will never actually play for the Bruins.

My thinking here is that Ottowa at least gets someone who can play now, and the Bruins can clear Backes' contract without having to overpay massively to attach him on to another deal.
Trades
1.
LAK
  1. Moore, John
  2. Zboril, Jakub
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (BOS)
2.
OTT
  1. Backes, David
  2. 2021 4th round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$77,871,667$0$2,432,500$3,628,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,600,000$4,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,875,000$4,875,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 9, 2019 at 3:31 p.m.
#1
BigDog91
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 374
Why would ottawa make that trade and only get a 4th. Gaborik contract is insured and they dont have to pay him.
Matteo liked this.
Dec. 9, 2019 at 3:33 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
bigbrit93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 314
Likes: 9
Quoting: BigDog91
Why would ottawa make that trade and only get a 4th. Gaborik contract is insured and they dont have to pay him.


I couldn't find anything say his contract was anything more than a normal IR contract, which to me meant Ottowa still owed him the money. Was there a special circumstance on the trade due to his back injury that I missed when looking it up?
Dec. 9, 2019 at 3:36 p.m.
#3
BigDog91
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 374
Quoting: bigbrit93
I couldn't find anything say his contract was anything more than a normal IR contract, which to me meant Ottowa still owed him the money. Was there a special circumstance on the trade due to his back injury that I missed when looking it up?


All contracts on LTIR are insured by the league. Otherwise all good teams would be trading with sens for those players.
Matteo liked this.
Dec. 9, 2019 at 3:41 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
bigbrit93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 314
Likes: 9
Quoting: BigDog91
All contracts on LTIR are insured by the league. Otherwise all good teams would be trading with sens for those players.


That's a good point, but he's actually only listed on IR, not LTIR, on CapFriendly which made me think it would be easier (at all possible) to trade for his contract with minimal added on to a player who can contribute in any way.
Dec. 9, 2019 at 3:46 p.m.
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,435
Likes: 22,637
Quoting: bigbrit93
That's a good point, but he's actually only listed on IR, not LTIR, on CapFriendly which made me think it would be easier (at all possible) to trade for his contract with minimal added on to a player who can contribute in any way.


Stop it. LTIR or IR, may not no difference on who actually pays Gaborik's salary. More than likely it's the insurance company. Still why would the Sens want to pay out of pocket 4m for Backes next season? Plus ignoring the fact that Backes has M NTC and can easily block any trade to a team with cap space.
Dec. 9, 2019 at 3:59 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
bigbrit93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 314
Likes: 9
Quoting: palhal
Stop it. LTIR or IR, may not no difference on who actually pays Gaborik's salary. More than likely it's the insurance company. Still why would the Sens want to pay out of pocket 4m for Backes next season? Plus ignoring the fact that Backes has M NTC and can easily block any trade to a team with cap space.


My thought process (as bad as it seems to be) was that Ottowa would really only be taking on 1.2 mil more in cap for a player to actually contribute. This was me going purely off cap numbers, and not taking in to consideration (due to ignorance/naiveness) that they may not actually be paying any of Gaborik's salary at the moment. And as for the M-NTC I'm going off the assumption Backes would rather play in the NHL than the AHL, but maybe I'd be wrong.
Dec. 9, 2019 at 4:07 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,570
Likes: 6,714
The team can choose to either put him on IR or LTIR. LTIR means they can spend above the cap ceiling by his cap hit in order to replace him if they wanted to. IR there isn't any cap relief, the player just doesn't count as an active player on the roster anymore. So they can add another player to the roster and go over the 23 man limit. But once again, no cap relief. There is also some differences in how long the player must be "injured" for to apply for either category. If you have small injury that only has you miss 1-2 games or whatever, you can't go on LTIR because the player must not be able to enter the lineup for X amount of days to qualify for LTIR. Its so teams can't "cheat" the system. They still do however but its technically legal.

Ottawa has him on IR solely so that they can stay above the salary cap floor while not having to pay him. That's it.

Late edit: Ottawa purposefully doesn't want players that they have to pay actual dollars to. They actively want Gaborik because they aren't paying him but his cap is helping them reach the floor. So Backes being healthy enough to play at least a little forces them to have to pay him. They don't want that at. They'd prefer a 700K player instead of Backes so they can keep the salary overall lower.
Dec. 9, 2019 at 4:23 p.m.
#8
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,091
Likes: 6,973
So, here’s the big thing about the backes trade. Gaborik is on LTIR for the rest of his career, and his contract is 80% insured. So next year the sens owe him 615K. Next year Backes is owed 4 mill. There’s no way Ottawa does that, and there’s no way Backes waives to go there.

Toffoli...ugh. I’m sick of hearing about him. In his last 112 games he has 19 freaking goals. No thanks.
Dec. 9, 2019 at 4:54 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
bigbrit93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 314
Likes: 9
Quoting: F50marco
The team can choose to either put him on IR or LTIR. LTIR means they can spend above the cap ceiling by his cap hit in order to replace him if they wanted to. IR there isn't any cap relief, the player just doesn't count as an active player on the roster anymore. So they can add another player to the roster and go over the 23 man limit. But once again, no cap relief. There is also some differences in how long the player must be "injured" for to apply for either category. If you have small injury that only has you miss 1-2 games or whatever, you can't go on LTIR because the player must not be able to enter the lineup for X amount of days to qualify for LTIR. Its so teams can't "cheat" the system. They still do however but its technically legal.

Ottawa has him on IR solely so that they can stay above the salary cap floor while not having to pay him. That's it.

Late edit: Ottawa purposefully doesn't want players that they have to pay actual dollars to. They actively want Gaborik because they aren't paying him but his cap is helping them reach the floor. So Backes being healthy enough to play at least a little forces them to have to pay him. They don't want that at. They'd prefer a 700K player instead of Backes so they can keep the salary overall lower.


Appreciate the input, I didn't realize that's how the difference between IR and LTIR worked.

Bcarlo25- I know he struggled last year, but he's back on a 20 goal pace this year. Do you not think he has the skill set to gel and succeed with Krecji?
Dec. 9, 2019 at 5:43 p.m.
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,435
Likes: 22,637
Quoting: bigbrit93
My thought process (as bad as it seems to be) was that Ottowa would really only be taking on 1.2 mil more in cap for a player to actually contribute. This was me going purely off cap numbers, and not taking in to consideration (due to ignorance/naiveness) that they may not actually be paying any of Gaborik's salary at the moment. And as for the M-NTC I'm going off the assumption Backes would rather play in the NHL than the AHL, but maybe I'd be wrong.


Sending Backes to the AHL saves the Bruins minimal cap space. It saves them 1.075m, But then they have to fill that roster with let's say a 900,000 player. Cap saving $ 100,750. Do Bruins want to scare off any other potential signings just to save 100,000 in one year of cap?
Dec. 9, 2019 at 6:22 p.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Yeah Backes isn't waiving from Boston to Ottawa, Not even in the realm of possibilities.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll