SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blockbuster Deal with Chicago

Created by: Eklund
Team: 2019-20 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 13, 2019
Published: Dec. 13, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Hard to let Meier go and I don't see Doug doing it but having Lehner solves a ton of problems.
Trades
CHI
  1. Dillon, Brenden
  2. Kniazev, Artemi
  3. Meier, Timo
  4. 2021 1st round pick (SJS)
  5. 2021 3rd round pick (SJS)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$70,997,416$660,750$347,500$10,502,584
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$736,666$736,666 (Performance Bonus$70,000$70K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,400,000$1,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$675,000$675,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$960,000$960,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 13, 2019 at 7:10 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 67
Likes: 3
Chicago runs to accept this deal
Dec. 13, 2019 at 7:12 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
More To Come
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 371
Quoting: jdhbike94
Chicago runs to accept this deal


They'd be crazy not to lol
Dec. 13, 2019 at 7:12 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
More To Come
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 371
glitch
Dec. 13, 2019 at 7:13 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
More To Come
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 371
glitch
Dec. 13, 2019 at 9:22 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 656
Would you accept this trade:

Crawford (3mil retained)
Nylander

for

M. Karlsson
Dell
Chmelevski
Dec. 13, 2019 at 9:54 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
More To Come
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 371
Quoting: Petrock83
Would you accept this trade:

Crawford (3mil retained)
Nylander

for

M. Karlsson
Dell
Chmelevski


Crawford and Nylander don’t really interest me. 4 out of Crawford’s last five starts he has posted a sub .900 save percentage so that isn’t very encouraging. Nylander is likely a bust imo and has less value than Chmelevski does potential.
Dec. 13, 2019 at 11:35 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 656
Quoting: Eklund
Crawford and Nylander don’t really interest me. 4 out of Crawford’s last five starts he has posted a sub .900 save percentage so that isn’t very encouraging. Nylander is likely a bust imo and has less value than Chmelevski does potential.


I don’t necessarily disagree, but I think some things need to be put in context. Crawford’s last 4 starts have been behind a defense that’s missing Keith, and for a few of those games De Haan or Maatta as well, so we had at least 2 of Gilbert/Koekkoek/Boqvist starting. Crow isn’t an elite goalie anymore, but he is a starter, and with a better defense in front of him I would argue he is a good amount better than Jones and Dell. He’s also on an expiring deal so it’s not like it’s a big commitment.

My thought with this trade is that if (maybe miraculously) start pushing for a playoff spot, this gives them a goalie that is more reliable than anything they have, and prospect who maybe is a downgrade from Chmelevski, but is NHL ready and can play in their top 9. (Nylander gets a worse rap than he deserves, he isn’t a bad player just not a top line guy)
Dec. 13, 2019 at 12:26 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
More To Come
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 371
Quoting: Petrock83
I don’t necessarily disagree, but I think some things need to be put in context. Crawford’s last 4 starts have been behind a defense that’s missing Keith, and for a few of those games De Haan or Maatta as well, so we had at least 2 of Gilbert/Koekkoek/Boqvist starting. Crow isn’t an elite goalie anymore, but he is a starter, and with a better defense in front of him I would argue he is a good amount better than Jones and Dell. He’s also on an expiring deal so it’s not like it’s a big commitment.

My thought with this trade is that if (maybe miraculously) start pushing for a playoff spot, this gives them a goalie that is more reliable than anything they have, and prospect who maybe is a downgrade from Chmelevski, but is NHL ready and can play in their top 9. (Nylander gets a worse rap than he deserves, he isn’t a bad player just not a top line guy)


I know, problem is SJ doesn’t have a better defense.
Dec. 13, 2019 at 2:15 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Quoting: Petrock83
Would you accept this trade:

Crawford (3mil retained)
Nylander

for

M. Karlsson
Dell
Chmelevski


Nah, Nylander is pretty eh and craw is an alright backup but not worth giving up one of our only good prospects for
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll