SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Beaut

Created by: bryanrowley
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 17, 2019
Published: Dec. 17, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,750,000
2$2,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$3,250,000
3$6,000,000
2$2,750,000
3$4,750,000
Trades
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$85,000,000$84,502,616$0$0$497,384
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
How then should the leafs address the fact that they lack depth on both offends and defense compared to the teams who are actually winning?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Dec. 17, 2019 at 9:44 a.m.
#1
Biased Opinion
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,683
Likes: 1,969
Quick question for you. How do you stay warm during the winter? Is there a stove under your bridge?
Big_Euge liked this.
Dec. 17, 2019 at 9:44 a.m.
#2
RangerWall92
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 989
Why though
Dec. 17, 2019 at 9:50 a.m.
#3
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
If you want Marner, start with Jones and vise versa.
Dec. 17, 2019 at 9:56 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 61
Likes: 7
Quoting: Barbs
Quick question for you. How do you stay warm during the winter? Is there a stove under your bridge?


Please, have a look at the poll
Dec. 17, 2019 at 10:09 a.m.
#5
Biased Opinion
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,683
Likes: 1,969
Quoting: bryanrowley
Please, have a look at the poll


Well if I want players that can win hockey games I wouldn't be calling Columbus right now lol
Dec. 17, 2019 at 10:10 a.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: bryanrowley
Please, have a look at the poll


The Leafs don't lack depth, they had a bad system and are starting to roll and the teams ahead of them should be concerned about that. A team with as much talent as TO who struggled due to a terrible system and injuries is not something that should be taken lightly. You're poll is just a troll looking for attention.
Dec. 17, 2019 at 10:15 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 61
Likes: 7
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
The Leafs don't lack depth, they had a bad system and are starting to roll and the teams ahead of them should be concerned about that. A team with as much talent as TO who struggled due to a terrible system and injuries is not something that should be taken lightly. You're poll is just a troll looking for attention.


By system are you referring to Babcock?
Dec. 17, 2019 at 10:19 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 61
Likes: 7
Quoting: Barbs
Well if I want players that can win hockey games I wouldn't be calling Columbus right now lol


That is true
Dec. 17, 2019 at 10:30 a.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: bryanrowley
By system are you referring to Babcock?


That is correct.
Dec. 17, 2019 at 10:48 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 61
Likes: 7
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
That is correct.


Bad system implies that Babcock was bad; he’s not a bad coach he’s a demonstrated winner at most of the levels of hockey he has coached in. I do agree that his system was not conducive to the Leafs’ success with the team they have now, but he’s not bad
Dec. 17, 2019 at 10:48 a.m.
#11
rickdabeaut
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 53
I like the idea of getting two players that can play for one. Front loading 4 forwards has really helped us out eh leafs nation?
Dec. 17, 2019 at 10:52 a.m.
#12
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,406
Likes: 22,627
Murray and Jenner are 26 years old, and really are kind just average players, yea they had moments of goodness. Marner though his cap hit is too high is very good player now and still has room to grow. Liljegren is expected to be a cost efficient and good Leaf for years...starting next year. Certainly the trade doesn't help the Leafs this year and hurts them big time in the future.

It's really a dumb poll. No team including the Leafs should expect to resign their UFAs. Leafs do have cap space next year even after signing their RFAs. In they do need more cap to address an need, let's say on defence, they can trade a good forward with cap. Certainly wouldn't be trading 11m Marner for 8.3m the meh Jenner and Murray. Just because the CBJ have wasted their cap space and draft picks, other teams shouldn't be helping them out.
Dec. 17, 2019 at 10:53 a.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: bryanrowley
Bad system implies that Babcock was bad; he’s not a bad coach he’s a demonstrated winner at most of the levels of hockey he has coached in. I do agree that his system was not conducive to the Leafs’ success with the team they have now, but he’s not bad


I think he did what many successful people do, he became ruled by his ego and refused to bend to any new ideas. He was stagnant and his motivational style just doesn't work anymore. No one wants to be berated, it just doesn't motivate people. I respect Babs for what he's done in his career but if you don't evolve you die and he refused to evolve. It'll be interesting to see what happens with him next. Does he get another job and try to do the same stuff he did in TO, thinking that it was the players and GM's fault and not his? Or will he actually make changes to what he does and evolves?
Dec. 17, 2019 at 11:28 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 61
Likes: 7
Quoting: palhal
Murray and Jenner are 26 years old, and really are kind just average players, yea they had moments of goodness. Marner though his cap hit is too high is very good player now and still has room to grow. Liljegren is expected to be a cost efficient and good Leaf for years...starting next year. Certainly the trade doesn't help the Leafs this year and hurts them big time in the future.

It's really a dumb poll. No team including the Leafs should expect to resign their UFAs. Leafs do have cap space next year even after signing their RFAs. In they do need more cap to address an need, let's say on defence, they can trade a good forward with cap. Certainly wouldn't be trading 11m Marner for 8.3m the meh Jenner and Murray. Just because the CBJ have wasted their cap space and draft picks, other teams shouldn't be helping them out.


What about Marner to Anaheim for Hampus Lindholm and perhaps some other change? It would be great if they could get Rakell also (low salary and proven goal scorer)
Dec. 17, 2019 at 11:32 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 61
Likes: 7
Quoting: rickdabeaut
I like the idea of getting two players that can play for one. Front loading 4 forwards has really helped us out eh leafs nation?


81 million for a salary cap + 33 mil tied up to 3 players is a tough situation - that’s 40% of the cap to 15% of the roster...tough times
Dec. 17, 2019 at 1:57 p.m.
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,406
Likes: 22,627
Quoting: rickdabeaut
I like the idea of getting two players that can play for one. Front loading 4 forwards has really helped us out eh leafs nation?


We'll say how paying the big four and overpaying them by 5m affects this Leafs long term. This is just the first year of those big contracts

Though I kinda agree with your suggestion of two players for one. They should good players. You can't really say Boone and Murray are difference makers at 8.3m. Gee, they are overpaid.
I won't trade Liljegren for those two Columbus players. Murray is a UFA the Leafs have lots of cheaper forwards as good a Boone. Liljegren has hope and hopefully lots of cheap term and a Leaf.

How has the "alleged" good defence and goaltending worked out for CBJ over the years? Bobvorsky in net, Jones, Werenski, Savard, Murray on defence. One playoff round win since inception. Even after trading the never seen the playoff Nash for Dubinsky. Seven years, 4 playoff appearances Seems like it has been organization for years that can't manage personnel or the cap wisely.
Dec. 18, 2019 at 3:22 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 61
Likes: 7
Quoting: palhal
We'll say how paying the big four and overpaying them by 5m affects this Leafs long term. This is just the first year of those big contracts

Though I kinda agree with your suggestion of two players for one. They should good players. You can't really say Boone and Murray are difference makers at 8.3m. Gee, they are overpaid.
I won't trade Liljegren for those two Columbus players. Murray is a UFA the Leafs have lots of cheaper forwards as good a Boone. Liljegren has hope and hopefully lots of cheap term and a Leaf.

How has the "alleged" good defence and goaltending worked out for CBJ over the years? Bobvorsky in net, Jones, Werenski, Savard, Murray on defence. One playoff round win since inception. Even after trading the never seen the playoff Nash for Dubinsky. Seven years, 4 playoff appearances Seems like it has been organization for years that can't manage personnel or the cap wisely.


If you Dubas current GM and future prime minister of Canada, what two players would you try to acquire for one of the big 4? I suggested Lindholm and Rakkell in an earlier thread - what do you think? Are there other options you feel may place the Leafs in a better situation?
Dec. 18, 2019 at 4:15 p.m.
#18
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,406
Likes: 22,627
Quoting: bryanrowley
If you Dubas current GM and future prime minister of Canada, what two players would you try to acquire for one of the big 4? I suggested Lindholm and Rakkell in an earlier thread - what do you think? Are there other options you feel may place the Leafs in a better situation?


My opinion on the Leafs this year is they aren't good enough. No amount of trades can make them better this year Due to the overpayment of the RFA, they weren't able to retain the competent Hainsey and Gardiner. And while I don't mind ridding themselves of Zaitsev long term, Ceci isn't as good as Zaitsev this year.
Next year they will have some cap flexibility and maybe during the summer they will have trade some forward cap for defence man cap.
I wouldn't trade the big three. Nylander I don't think he great value at 7m (though many Leaf fans disagree), so maybe he's still a piece that stays. I'm thinking secondary players like Kapanen or Johnsson might be traded. They would bring cap relief and their spots could filled by other Leafs wingers...The Leaf seem to have abundance of potential good wingers and still cheap. Use that cap space difference to boast the defence...and maybe a second goalie. For cap reasons the Leafs will be depending on Liljegren and Sandin to make the team next year. Along with Reilly, Dermot and maybe UFA Holl...that's five. Finding two competent mid priced Dmen is the puzzle.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit