Forums/NHL Trades

(BUF/MTL) - Scandella for 2020 4th round pick (SJS)

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options

 

Jan 2 at 6:30
#1
Jan 2 at 6:32
#2
WE CAN AND WE WILL
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 767
Likes: 352
Two moves one night.
I_Am_Atem liked this.
Jan 2 at 6:34
#3
Road for 25th
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 50
Likes: 1
Ben chariot gone at trade deadline for round pick?
Jan 2 at 6:34
#4
Molson beer is meh
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,611
Likes: 1,013
Hometown guy. Maybe he can turn things around and go back to being a decent second pairing Dman
Rideordie, Boubou79 and KubaH liked this.
Jan 2 at 6:35
#5
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 468
Quoting: Habsnation
Ben chariot gone at trade deadline for round pick?


No, not this year
Jan 2 at 6:35
#6
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 1,303
Reilly + 4th for Scandella + 5th + Sturtz

Can't say I hate that trade.
Boubou79, MountRoyal514 and KubaH liked this.
Jan 2 at 6:36
#7
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 1,155
So basically the overall trade is:

Give Up:
Mike Reilly
2020 4th SJS

Get:
Marco Scandella
2021 5th OTT
Andrew Sturtz

Montreal trades back a round in exchange for evening out which years they have their picks in and upgrading Reilly. Nice.
HabsForEver, OldNYIfan, Boubou79 and 3 others liked this.
Jan 2 at 6:36
#8
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 1,303
Quoting: Habsnation
Ben chariot gone at trade deadline for round pick?


Hard to judge. I guess Kulak is the new #7?
Jan 2 at 6:36
#9
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 1,155
Quoting: Habsnation
Ben chariot gone at trade deadline for round pick?


No chance. Scandella and Kulak can fight for #6D.
MaxDomi13 liked this.
Jan 2 at 6:37
#10
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 16,156
Likes: 4,035
I called this back in the offseason, when it SHOULD have happened based on the team needs and players available.. That was before knowing Chiarot was as legit as he has been. So Im glad I was wrong about that but what is the point of Scandella now? Guess Kulak is the odd man out? Maybe Fleury gets sent back to Laval?
Jan 2 at 6:39
#11
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 1,303
Quoting: F50marco
I called this back in the offseason, when it SHOULD have happened based on the team needs and players available.. That was before knowing Chiarot was as legit as he has been. So Im glad I was wrong about that but what is the point of Scandella now? Guess Kulak is the odd man out? Maybe Fleury gets sent back to Laval?


Fleury > Folin.

I imagine Kulak is the 7th
Jan 2 at 6:43
#12
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 16,156
Likes: 4,035
Quoting: HabsForEver
Fleury > Folin.

I imagine Kulak is the 7th


I agree but then you have a 7th dman making 1.85M for 3 years sitting in the stands when he's not good enough to crack the lineup.

Just seems like a waste. Next year its Chiarot, Mete and Romanov so I guess he sits again............... if that's the case, trade him. 1.85M is too much for a bench warmer.
Jan 2 at 6:47
#13
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 8,120
Likes: 3,410
I think this is an even exchange. I had Scandella going for two fifth-round picks in my Buffalo trade deadline scheme because I didn't think he was worth the third all the Buffalo guys were advocating, which was called "garbage" by one genius, so I guess I should feel vindicated by the actual deal.
Jan 2 at 6:47
#14
Molson beer is meh
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,611
Likes: 1,013
Quoting: F50marco
I agree but then you have a 7th dman making 1.85M for 3 years sitting in the stands when he's not good enough to crack the lineup.

Just seems like a waste. Next year its Chiarot, Mete and Romanov so I guess he sits again............... if that's the case, trade him. 1.85M is too much for a bench warmer.


Meh, until MTL start getting tight with the salary cap. no rush to move him. but yeah if Habs start getting close to the cap, move him.
Jan 2 at 6:48
#15
Road for 25th
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 50
Likes: 1
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
No chance. Scandella and Kulak can fight for #6D.


If Canadiens are out of playoffs run, I guess they will trade Scandella, Tatar, Byron and Thompson
Jan 2 at 6:49
#16
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 16,156
Likes: 4,035
Quoting: Blazingbat11
Meh, until MTL start getting tight with the salary cap. no rush to move him. but yeah if Habs start getting close to the cap, move him.


Yeah that is true, I keep forgetting the Habs have more cap space then they can actually spend if they wanted to........ paying depth more than they deserve isn't really a problem until you need cap for more important things.
Jan 2 at 6:49
#17
gabriiel40
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 213
Likes: 40
Would have felt better by sending over the Jets 4th round pick...but a difference of 16 picks wont kill us. Overall, probably a fair deal....doesn't change the needle much for Montreal though....
Jan 2 at 6:50
#18
AwesomeMatthews
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 714
Likes: 547
Don't get Buffalo swapping Scandella for Frolik, Scandella is the better player
Boubou79 liked this.
Jan 2 at 6:52
#19
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 1,303
Quoting: F50marco
I agree but then you have a 7th dman making 1.85M for 3 years sitting in the stands when he's not good enough to crack the lineup.

Just seems like a waste. Next year its Chiarot, Mete and Romanov so I guess he sits again............... if that's the case, trade him. 1.85M is too much for a bench warmer.


He probably gets traded then. We shall find out after the game
Jan 2 at 6:52
#20
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 618
Likes: 244
Edited Jan 2 at 7:05
If we get the Minnesota Scandella, it will be a steal.
If it is the Buffalo Scandella, Im still happy to get rid of Reilly's contract next year.

I guess I would see this as a good sign for Romanov travel over the Atlantic next year.
OldNYIfan, Trickster, Boubou79 and 2 others liked this.
Jan 2 at 6:53
#21
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 1,155
Quoting: Habsnation
If Canadiens are out of playoffs run, I guess they will trade Scandella, Tatar, Byron and Thompson


There’s no reason to trade Tatar/Byron. Neither have 1 YL.
Jan 2 at 7:12
#22
BtZ's buttercup
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 1,847
Wasn't it Bogosian that requested the trade out of Buffalo and not Scandella??
MountRoyal514 and Boubou79 liked this.
Jan 2 at 8:18
#23
MountRoyal514
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 756
Likes: 239
Scandella is definitely better than Reilly, even if only marginally, and they clear a contract space for next season, plus get a home town player and they pick up a minors player for their injury-depleted AHL squad. Good asset management by Montreal so we can call it a win but this will barely have any real impact in their overall season however since they are all depth players and late round picks moving
OldNYIfan, Boubou79, pinslack and 1 other person liked this.
Jan 3 at 3:24
#24
rangersandislesfan
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 26,993
Likes: 2,966
I voted Montreal wins, but i still thought the votes would be more even than they are.
Jan 3 at 9:46
#25
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 1,303
Quoting: MountRoyal514
Scandella is definitely better than Reilly, even if only marginally, and they clear a contract space for next season, plus get a home town player and they pick up a minors player for their injury-depleted AHL squad. Good asset management by Montreal so we can call it a win but this will barely have any real impact in their overall season however since they are all depth players and late round picks moving


There's virtually no way Scandella is worse than Reilly. If Scandella can prove to be a 3rd pairing defensemen, he's already better than Reilly.
MountRoyal514 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit