SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fantasyland

Created by: Jah1722
Team: 2020-21 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 5, 2020
Published: Jan. 5, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
A competitive team that is still fine come expansion draft. Protect Nylander, Rakell, Silfverberg, Zucker, Lundestrom, Kase, Jones, Lindholm, Risto, Fowler, and Gibson. Also gives the lottery pick an extra year to develop if needed

How far off are the trades?
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$950,000
1$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$900,000
1$900,000
1$900,000
1$1,800,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Manson, Josh
  2. Steel, Sam
  3. 2020 3rd round pick (ANA)
2.
3.
MIN
  1. Ritchie, Nick
  2. Sherwood, Kiefer [RFA Rights]
  3. Shore, Devin [RFA Rights]
  4. Sprong, Daniel [RFA Rights]
  5. 2021 2nd round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
Pick up to 2 of the RFAs + conditional 2nd turns into a 1st if Ducks win a playoff round and Zucker plays 50% of playoff games
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$74,364,949$0$132,500$9,135,051
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$820,000$820,000
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$900,000$900,000
LW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,133,333$1,133,333
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$745,000$745,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$900,000$900,000
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:01 p.m.
#1
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,658
The only trade I like is the Zucker one
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:11 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: MDA_47
The only trade I like is the Zucker one


The only one I’m iffy on is the Risto. But Henrique is expendable. Like cap hits fills a need.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:15 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 2,670
Quoting: Jah1722
The only one I’m iffy on is the Risto. But Henrique is expendable. Like cap hits fills a need.


I’m not sure I would like to make this deal now, maybe at the beginning of the season, but now Risto is pretty well and Henrique contract does not seem attractive for its production.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:21 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: SalamiCheese
I’m not sure I would like to make this deal now, maybe at the beginning of the season, but now Risto is pretty well and Henrique contract does not seem attractive for its production.


20 goal 2/3C? That’s what he’s on pace for on a poor team.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:29 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Toronto won’t even consider trading nylander for a defenseman like Manson. Nylander have already 2 60 point season and is on pace for over 70. Manson isn’t even a top 50 defenseman in the league. Sam steel is sure interesting but not enough to draw real interest.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:33 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 2,670
Quoting: Jah1722
20 goal 2/3C? That’s what he’s on pace for on a poor team.


40 points, almost 6 million a year, maybe his game will decline in a couple of years. I'm not saying that I don’t like Enrique as a player, but I would seriously think or look for cheaper options.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:36 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Sebybbq
Toronto won’t even consider trading nylander for a defenseman like Manson. Nylander have already 2 60 point season and is on pace for over 70. Manson isn’t even a top 50 defenseman in the league. Sam steel is sure interesting but not enough to draw real interest.


Manson is also a pure DFD, he's a decent 2 or 3
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:44 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: Sebybbq
Toronto won’t even consider trading nylander for a defenseman like Manson. Nylander have already 2 60 point season and is on pace for over 70. Manson isn’t even a top 50 defenseman in the league. Sam steel is sure interesting but not enough to draw real interest.


Toronto has 2 D signed next year and one RFA. They’ll need Dmen. They get at worst a number 4 guy, a young 3C who could grow into a 2c and 2M+ in cap space. Can’t judge a defensemen based solely on points especially a defensive minded guy. You can dislike the trade based on Manson’s play this season since he returned from his knee injury but don’t base it solely on which player has more points.
GMs liked this.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:45 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: AFOX10900
Manson is also a pure DFD, he's a decent 2 or 3


He is a second pairing defenseman. That where he would be on a playoff team. The fact that asking nylander in a trade for Manson is completely insane. The value is completely off. Manson would barely get you jjohnsson. Manson have been a 15-20 point guy for most of is career with correct metrics except that one season who he had 37 and was over his number in almost every category.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:48 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: SalamiCheese
40 points, almost 6 million a year, maybe his game will decline in a couple of years. I'm not saying that I don’t like Enrique as a player, but I would seriously think or look for cheaper options.


Henrique will be 34 when his deal expires. There’s plenty of guys 34 or older that have maintained their play. The cap is similar and I don’t think you’ll fill the 2C spot with any one at significantly cheaper cap hit without giving up more than Risto. Figured Risto for Henrique made sense for both teams to fill some holes.
GMs liked this.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:50 p.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: Jah1722
Toronto has 2 D signed next year and one RFA. They’ll need Dmen. They get at worst a number 4 guy, a young 3C who could grow into a 2c and 2M+ in cap space. Can’t judge a defensemen based solely on points especially a defensive minded guy. You can dislike the trade based on Manson’s play this season since he returned from his knee injury but don’t base it solely on which player has more points.


I could judge this on any point of view and your evaluation would still be terrible. A 23 years old 70 + point forward will cost a lot more than a Manson. The ducks only defenseman that would interest the leafs in a nylander trade would be lindholm. There not a gm who will trade young players like nylander for average defenseman. You can argue all day long but in the end if you trade manson to the leafs you will get a winger like johnsson or kapanen. Even with sam steel in the deal.
TMLSage liked this.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:50 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: Sebybbq
He is a second pairing defenseman. That where he would be on a playoff team. The fact that asking nylander in a trade for Manson is completely insane. The value is completely off. Manson would barely get you jjohnsson. Manson have been a 15-20 point guy for most of is career with correct metrics except that one season who he had 37 and was over his number in almost every category.


Last season the leafs were bottom 5 in cycle chances against. I’d like to see those numbers for this year because I bet they’re pretty poor again. Manson helps with that. If you wanna hate on a Dman because he doesn’t put up 60+ points go for it but don’t act like that package is god awful.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:51 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Sebybbq
He is a second pairing defenseman. That where he would be on a playoff team. The fact that asking nylander in a trade for Manson is completely insane. The value is completely off. Manson would barely get you jjohnsson. Manson have been a 15-20 point guy for most of is career with correct metrics except that one season who he had 37 and was over his number in almost every category.


So you're using points... A completely offensive metric to measure how good a DEFENSIVE DEFENSEman is... Not to mention it's gonna have to be an overpay for ANA to trade him, and you're getting a younger (ED exempt) likely high end 2C as a return as well, ik Nylander is a legit first liner, but that's not a horrible return imp
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:52 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: Sebybbq
I could judge this on any point of view and your evaluation would still be terrible. A 23 years old 70 + point forward will cost a lot more than a Manson. The ducks only defenseman that would interest the leafs in a nylander trade would be lindholm. There not a gm who will trade young players like nylander for average defenseman. You can argue all day long but in the end if you trade manson to the leafs you will get a winger like johnsson or kapanen. Even with sam steel in the deal.


You’re delusional if you think Manson and Steel are only worth Johnsson or Kapanen. Good talk bud.
Wqrrior and GMs liked this.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:52 p.m.
#15
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,627
Likes: 12,353
Leafs and Sabres need more, doubt the Wild would have any interest in dealing Zucker for that stuff.
Pharow liked this.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:55 p.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: Jah1722
Last season the leafs were bottom 5 in cycle chances against. I’d like to see those numbers for this year because I bet they’re pretty poor again. Manson helps with that. If you wanna hate on a Dman because he doesn’t put up 60+ points go for it but don’t act like that package is god awful.


This package is god awful. Your evaluation is so off that is almost funny. Your pretending that manson is a top prize defenseman. I mean they trade for muzzin last year and they got him for 2 season. For a late first and two b prospect. Muzzin is by far superior to Manson. How can 2 and a half year of Manson can land you Nylander????
Jan. 5, 2020 at 6:58 p.m.
#17
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: AFOX10900
So you're using points... A completely offensive metric to measure how good a DEFENSIVE DEFENSEman is... Not to mention it's gonna have to be an overpay for ANA to trade him, and you're getting a younger (ED exempt) likely high end 2C as a return as well, ik Nylander is a legit first liner, but that's not a horrible return imp


That a horrible return. The fact that nylander is by far the best player in that trade, that he is sign for 6 more years at a very good prize and that manson is making a lot of money for only 2 and a half season before turning to ufa and that sam steel have potential but have showed nothing yet is terrible evaluation.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 7:01 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: Sebybbq
This package is god awful. Your evaluation is so off that is almost funny. Your pretending that manson is a top prize defenseman. I mean they trade for muzzin last year and they got him for 2 season. For a late first and two b prospect. Muzzin is by far superior to Manson. How can 2 and a half year of Manson can land you Nylander????


So 2 second pairing Ds have values that are so different that ones worth nothing and ones worth a late first and 2 b prospects? Yeah this conversation is going nowhere it’s been a good talk. Keep doing you.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 7:03 p.m.
#19
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: Jah1722
You’re delusional if you think Manson and Steel are only worth Johnsson or Kapanen. Good talk bud.


@SammyT_51 @GMs @math731 @mhockey91 @OldNYIfan @TMLSage @Caniac555 @tsyls @leaflet @Wqrrior

Hey guy would you help us here. What evaluation can you make from that deal
Tor nylander for ana manson and sam steel
mhockey91 liked this.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 7:06 p.m.
#20
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: Jah1722
So 2 second pairing Ds have values that are so different that ones worth nothing and ones worth a late first and 2 b prospects? Yeah this conversation is going nowhere it’s been a good talk. Keep doing you.


What are you talking about i never said that manson had no value but if a guy like muzzin get you a late first and 2 b prospect there no way Manson is getting you Nylander even with sam steel or isaac lunderstrom or whoever prospect you throw in.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 7:08 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 2,670
Quoting: Jah1722
Henrique will be 34 when his deal expires. There’s plenty of guys 34 or older that have maintained their play. The cap is similar and I don’t think you’ll fill the 2C spot with any one at significantly cheaper cap hit without giving up more than Risto. Figured Risto for Henrique made sense for both teams to fill some holes.


Maybe so, all the same, our GM seems to not even know that we need a center.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 7:52 p.m.
#22
Brad Boyes please Wq
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 714
Quoting: AFOX10900
So you're using points... A completely offensive metric to measure how good a DEFENSIVE DEFENSEman is... Not to mention it's gonna have to be an overpay for ANA to trade him, and you're getting a younger (ED exempt) likely high end 2C as a return as well, ik Nylander is a legit first liner, but that's not a horrible return imp


Quoting: AFOX10900
So you're using points... A completely offensive metric to measure how good a DEFENSIVE DEFENSEman is... Not to mention it's gonna have to be an overpay for ANA to trade him, and you're getting a younger (ED exempt) likely high end 2C as a return as well, ik Nylander is a legit first liner, but that's not a horrible return imp


You Really love Josh Manson. Did you get the wedding ring yet. Because you ar acting like Buttman when the pens are in trouble
Pharow liked this.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 7:58 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: StoneFan
You Really love Josh Manson. Did you get the wedding ring yet. Because you ar acting like Buttman when the pens are in trouble


No I realize he's the only competent NHL RHD the ducks currently have in the system for the next 3 or so years
Jan. 5, 2020 at 7:59 p.m.
#24
Brad Boyes please Wq
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 714
Quoting: AFOX10900
No I realize he's the only competent NHL RHD the ducks currently have in the system for the next 3 or so years


We ain’t dumb dude, but you overrate and overvalue him to crap
Pharow liked this.
Jan. 5, 2020 at 8:01 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: StoneFan
We ain’t dumb dude, but you overrate and overvalue him to crap


It's called team needs, if he was on a team like even PIT, he wouldn't have 1/2 the value he does (though I feel like you're underrating him)
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll