SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

In a Perfect World

Created by: shmoeman
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 16, 2020
Published: Jan. 16, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Yes I know MTL isnt going to trade Gallagher, ESPECIALLY to the Bruins. Hence the title "In a perfect world"
I do think the price is pretty fair. A top prospect at LHD Vaak, Steen who is a very underrated prospect that was great for an underaged player in the SHL, and a couple of good picks.

Not sure how likely NYR is to move Lemieux, but hes exactly what the Bs need on their 4th line. Value is prob a little low, but in the ballpark. I think Quinn would love Kuhlman

Cap is a bit off, can easily be worked around with sending someone down, etc
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Steen, Oskar
  2. Vaakanainen, Urho
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (BOS)
  4. 2021 3rd round pick (BOS)
2.
NYR
  1. Kuhlman, Karson
  2. Shen, Pavel
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,096,667$0$2,432,500$1,403,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 16, 2020 at 7:39 p.m.
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
No thx
Jan. 16, 2020 at 7:41 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 930
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
No thx


If the Rags were to trade Lemieux, what do you think the haul would be?
Jan. 16, 2020 at 7:48 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
If Gallagher mention to the GM he wants to test the market the 1st of July 2021, I can see them accepting this offer this TDL. Honest trade, but like you said, in a perfect world wink
Jan. 16, 2020 at 7:50 p.m.
#4
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
No thx


We should get Bjork for Lemieux and a 5th IMO. An energy guy who can produce for a skilled guy. But then again NYR shouldn't trade Lemieux... like at all
Jan. 16, 2020 at 8:47 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Bruins HUGE overpayment on both trades! This is TERRIBLE

Vaak is the bruins only like guaranteed great prospect. Steen is now a top 6 potential, and the 2nd and 3rd are WAY overkill

Lemieux is a bottom 6 grinder - Kuhlman alone (top 6 potential) is an overpayment .

My god this is bad
Jan. 16, 2020 at 8:48 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
We should get Bjork for Lemieux and a 5th IMO. An energy guy who can produce for a skilled guy. But then again NYR shouldn't trade Lemieux... like at all


Also bjork is worth more than Lemieux so bruins decline easy
Jan. 16, 2020 at 8:48 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
No thx


Lol dont worry, bruins decline first.
Jan. 17, 2020 at 1:35 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 930
Quoting: bsilk18
Bruins HUGE overpayment on both trades! This is TERRIBLE

Vaak is the bruins only like guaranteed great prospect. Steen is now a top 6 potential, and the 2nd and 3rd are WAY overkill

Lemieux is a bottom 6 grinder - Kuhlman alone (top 6 potential) is an overpayment .

My god this is bad


As a Bruins fan, you really are overrating the Bs prospects rn. I love Vaak, but what do you think it takes to get a very good top 6F with a year left on a GREAT deal? Vaak is great, but Brannstrom went for Stone, Vaak+++ goes for Gallagher in the division. Kuhlman doesnt have top 6 potential, he has middle 6. He becomes a 50 point guy at best , so does Lemieux but Lemieux already has a couple decent years under his belt, Kuhlman doesnt. Stop being bias...
Gofnut999 liked this.
Jan. 17, 2020 at 1:36 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 930
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
We should get Bjork for Lemieux and a 5th IMO. An energy guy who can produce for a skilled guy. But then again NYR shouldn't trade Lemieux... like at all


Bjork>>>Lemieux, you can get a solid pick, but Lemieux isnt making it out of the bottom 6 imo. Great bottom 6 guy tho
Gofnut999 liked this.
Jan. 17, 2020 at 4:45 a.m.
#10
Molson beer is meh
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 1,675
sweet jesus, base instinct is to say the Gallagher deal is god awful, but I'll admit I have no clue about Vaakanainen.... honest question here, is he that legit of a prospect that he could be a centerpiece of a deal that could fetch someone like Gally????
Jan. 17, 2020 at 11:14 a.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: shmoeman
As a Bruins fan, you really are overrating the Bs prospects rn. I love Vaak, but what do you think it takes to get a very good top 6F with a year left on a GREAT deal? Vaak is great, but Brannstrom went for Stone, Vaak+++ goes for Gallagher in the division. Kuhlman doesnt have top 6 potential, he has middle 6. He becomes a 50 point guy at best , so does Lemieux but Lemieux already has a couple decent years under his belt, Kuhlman doesnt. Stop being bias...


Lol Im 100% not being biased obviously. Vaak is worth more than Gallagher, and Kuhlman is worth more than Lemieux. Now if you really wanna say its close, thats fine. But 1 for 1 trades would still not be in the bruins favor.
Jan. 17, 2020 at 11:33 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 6,103
Likes: 2,240
Montreal rejects simply because it's Boston. He deserves better than that.
Jan. 17, 2020 at 11:37 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
Quoting: HabsForEver
Montreal rejects simply because it's Boston. He deserves better than that.


somebody didnt read the description, or the title.
Jan. 17, 2020 at 11:38 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 6,103
Likes: 2,240
Quoting: hanson493
somebody didnt read the description, or the title.


Don't really bother reading Descriptions because 95% of the time, people just say stupid ****, but yeah, value is fair.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll