I mean from the Canes standpoint im down for this, but I feel like we arent giving up enough! not to sure how I would add to it, but looks good anyway

Barrie is better than Larsson and Kapanen is better than Haula. This is a no from TO

Creative, for sure!
I would need some confirmation that Puljujarvi can be a productive middle 6 RW and that Bean would be able to stick as a 2nd pairing LHD...but if they can, I would take this deal.

It's definitely creative, and I love that. But not sure that trade helps the Leafs at all. Haula is not a great fit for the Leafs, Larsson is iffy and adding a 2nd rounder isn't that important.

I think Minny gets a lot more then they should and Edmonton gets a lot less. But I like the conversation.

So basically what I see is Carolina wants Barrie and Kapanen but doesn’t want to give up what it would cost to get him so they make a 4 way deal where they give up the least and get 2 of the 3 best players in the deal.

I don't mind it from MN pov. It might be too much actually, but I'm not a Zucker fan so I undersell him.

Edmonton could really use Zucker but they can't afford to lose Larsson either, maybe if they get TVR in the deal it'd work.

Good effort and its not half bad. 4 ways of this magnitude are just too impossible to get done. Its hard enough negotiating a fair price with one GM, imagine 4 GM's talking altogether? I think each team could get what they want working directly with one team rather than everyone trading a piece to one of the other teams.

People really undervalue Haula on this site. He's been very good for the Canes. 11 goals in 30 GP - a 30 goal pace for a full season. I'd be looking to re-sign him if it weren't for the reported riff between him and Rod.