-VGK has a decent chunk of money coming off the books, so I think they'll be fine.
-$6 million is a lot for Strome, and NYR can probably find players at cheaper rates to produce at high levels offensively when playing with Panarin. They also can find better defensive forwards than Strome, who is one of the league leaders in penalties taken, and advanced metrics suggest his defensive is poor. I just think NYR can spend the money better, and pick up more assets in the process. I am just a little pessimistic on the return compared to you (although a 2nd and a 3rd is not terrible). If Panarin is out a few games, let's see is Strome produces the same as before. I still think NYR should trade him, and just take the best deal offered.
-JT Miller and Guentzel are distinguishable from Strome because they are signed to term. Strome is a pending RFA and could arbitrate for a one year deal and then walk to UFA next offseason. I think this deflates teams' willingness to pay.
-In the following tweet, if you look at the graph, you can see that Strome significantly benefit from playing with Panarin and Fast. I am certainly not taking anything away from Strome. I believe he's a top 6 forward. But playing with one of the best offensive players in the world and a great defensive forward does help him look good. Also, doesn't you Lindholm example prove that playing with better people inflates your stats?
Here is the link.
pic.twitter.com/VQs7Rcm4RD[/quote]
1) Yeah less of a cap concern and more positional: Basically does Vegas want to pay 8 mil+ for a top pair Dman on the UFA market that's going to be in his 30's for the majority if not the entirety of the contract: Barrie/Krug/Pietrangelo. Even the 2nd tier options are going to be in their 30's for the majority if not entirety of the contract and going to cost 5 mil AAV at least for long term: Muzzin/Brodie/Schultz/Vatanen/Tanev/Hamonic/Gudas/Dillon....
As opposed to Trouba who's 25 and who's off contract by 32. It's really an investment choice, and you'd think a smart team wouldn't want to have Tyson Barrie or Torrey Krug making 8 mil at age 34 with 2 years left to go on their deal...
2) I agree. And I can't think of a scenario in which the Rangers pay Strome. I don't think the contract situation is a huge issue, and Strome playing for 3 teams already is a good incentive for him to ink a long term deal. I think he realizes this is his chance to cash in. So if a long term deal is what it takes to get a trade done, I think it'll happen.
3) Yes playing with one of the best offensive players in the world does help him look good.....like Guentzel lol
https://hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/replacements/1819/PIT/crosbsi87/wrap
The point about Lindholm and Guentzel and Miller is that yes playing with better people does inflate your stats. And when it comes to trade value for Forwards - Points directly correlates to trade value on the open market
regardless of context.....Thus you
can say that Strome would only be worth a 2nd/3rd ONLY if you also say that Lindholm and Guentzel are also worth the same. Both of them Need Elite players to rack up point totals.
It's also interesting, because it seems to take a particular skill to actually compliment a player in such a way.
Examples: Andreas Johnsson spends 80+% of his TOI with Auston Matthews and hasn't sniffed above a 50 point pace
Alex Iafallo Spends 80% of his TOI with Anze Kopitar and he hasn't touched a 45 point pace
Zach Kassian spends 71% of his TOI with Connor friggin McDavid and he's at a 52 point pace.
Sam Reinhart spends 90%! of his TOI with Jack Eichel and he hasn't cleared a 70 point pace (though he's close)
Do you know what these players all have in common? They spend a greater portion of their Ice Time with an Elite player and they all have a lower scoring pace than Strome....
Assuming a contract is in a place, I can't think of a rational reason for him to go for less than JT Miller went for (1st + 3rd) and more likely MORE....