SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hawks- ducks

Created by: Leafs_fan13
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 25, 2020
Published: Jan. 25, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (CBJ)
2.
TOR
  1. 2020 5th round pick (DET)
3.
ANA
  1. 2020 4th round pick (VGK)
  2. 2020 7th round pick (WPG)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the DET
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$78,897,143$0$70,000$2,602,857
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,893,000$10,893,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$694,444$694,444 (Performance Bonus$70,000$70K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 25, 2020 at 12:16 a.m.
#1
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,844
Likes: 5,308
Detroit says no, Toronto throws a pick in for us to take his contract
Jan. 25, 2020 at 12:17 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Edited Jan. 25, 2020 at 12:30 a.m.
Thanks for thinking of us but not a chance we take that. For starters replace Johnson with Kap and even then the Hawks wouldn’t jump on it.
TMLSage liked this.
Jan. 25, 2020 at 12:50 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,914
Likes: 19,293
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Are you stupid? Hawks are getting a major steal in that deal (& zero chance Kapanen would be the piece going for Murphy unless it's Murphy plus more)

The value actually favours Chicago but it's a good hockey trade. Leafs get a decent #4 or #5 right handed d-man and the Hawks add some needed scoring. Not to mention that moving Murphy opens up room for other right handed d-man prospect for Chicago to try out.

Use your head a bit.


Ah the typical response:
- leaf fan trades for defense
- leaf fan puts defense on top pair
- other teams fan says no
- leaf fan say defense in trade is actually bad in response (sometimes a different fan)
#logic
ChiHawk and bjm96 liked this.
Jan. 25, 2020 at 12:55 a.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Ah the typical response:
- leaf fan trades for defense
- leaf fan puts defense on top pair
- other teams fan says no
- leaf fan say defense in trade is actually bad in response (sometimes a different fan)
#logic


You should learn to read properly before joining in on a topic..
- I never said Murphy was bad. I said the value was in favour of Chicago
- I also never made this idea, or said Murphy was a top pairing guy. I actually said he's about a #4 d-man
- I said this was actually a good hockey trade for both teams

... learn to read next time before you chime in wink
Leafs_fan13 liked this.
Jan. 25, 2020 at 1:09 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Edited Jan. 25, 2020 at 1:20 a.m.
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Are you stupid? Hawks are getting a major steal in that deal (& zero chance Kapanen would be the piece going for Murphy unless it's Murphy plus more)

The value actually favours Chicago but it's a good hockey trade. Leafs get a decent #4 or #5 right handed d-man and the Hawks add some needed scoring. Not to mention that moving Murphy opens up room for other right handed d-man prospect for Chicago to try out.

Use your head a bit.


So Kap; the amazing winger on pace for a whopping 16 goals! Typical Leafs fan overvaluing their players.

Sorry pal, we have a guy named Kubalik, you know a rookie winger with already 21 goals this season and on pace for 35 goals; we don't need a middle 6 winger with 10 goals at the cost of a top 2 D man on our roster.

Murphy a #4 or #5 D guy? Do you even watch hockey? Have you even seen Murphy besides the two times he's played Toronto?

You seriously don't have a clue, but name calling always comes from the guy in a position of strength in a argument right?

ANYWAY, the Hawks say NO and hang up
Jan. 25, 2020 at 1:38 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 5,538
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Are you stupid? Hawks are getting a major steal in that deal (& zero chance Kapanen would be the piece going for Murphy unless it's Murphy plus more)

The value actually favours Chicago but it's a good hockey trade. Leafs get a decent #4 or #5 right handed d-man and the Hawks add some needed scoring. Not to mention that moving Murphy opens up room for other right handed d-man prospect for Chicago to try out.

Use your head a bit.


Hawks score just fine. What they need is defense. They can actually use another Murphy. They sure as hell can't afford to give him up.
Jan. 25, 2020 at 5:49 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
I’d accept that offer for Des and you won’t be disappointed.
Jan. 25, 2020 at 9:54 a.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
Quoting: ChiHawk
So Kap; the amazing winger on pace for a whopping 16 goals! Typical Leafs fan overvaluing their players.

Sorry pal, we have a guy named Kubalik, you know a rookie winger with already 21 goals this season and on pace for 35 goals; we don't need a middle 6 winger with 10 goals at the cost of a top 2 D man on our roster.

Murphy a #4 or #5 D guy? Do you even watch hockey? Have you even seen Murphy besides the two times he's played Toronto?

You seriously don't have a clue, but name calling always comes from the guy in a position of strength in a argument right?

ANYWAY, the Hawks say NO and hang up


LOL.. cause goals and points are EVERYTHING.. but I'm the one who doesn't watch hockey? Ok kid.
Jan. 25, 2020 at 1:33 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: Ryminister_27
LOL.. cause goals and points are EVERYTHING.. but I'm the one who doesn't watch hockey? Ok kid.


"Kid" I'm pretty sure I'm older then you, lots of name calling gives it away for you.

Yup, we hang up. We have a rookie way out performing Kap or Johnsson. You want to talk about advanced stats, take a look for yourself. We don't need to trade a top 3 D guy for a middle 6 winger when we have Kane, Kubalik, Saad, Cat playing the top 6.

Try understanding the other team first before trying to debate from a position of weakness like you are.
Jan. 25, 2020 at 1:47 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
Quoting: ChiHawk
"Kid" I'm pretty sure I'm older then you, lots of name calling gives it away for you.

Yup, we hang up. We have a rookie way out performing Kap or Johnsson. You want to talk about advanced stats, take a look for yourself. We don't need to trade a top 3 D guy for a middle 6 winger when we have Kane, Kubalik, Saad, Cat playing the top 6.

Try understanding the other team first before trying to debate from a position of weakness like you are.


Kapanen has one of the best 5v5 pts/60 in the league.. that's getting someone better than Murphy.

Clearly you can't read my first post then. I said Johnsson for Murphy favours Chicago in value, but it's a hockey trade for both teams. It allows Chicago to bring up more RHD prospects (like Mitchell) and give more ice time to Boqvist to see what they have while Chicago needs to retool their roster. But yeah, I was clearly just looking at one roster. Nice job wink
Jan. 25, 2020 at 2:14 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Kapanen has one of the best 5v5 pts/60 in the league.. that's getting someone better than Murphy.

Clearly you can't read my first post then. I said Johnsson for Murphy favours Chicago in value, but it's a hockey trade for both teams. It allows Chicago to bring up more RHD prospects (like Mitchell) and give more ice time to Boqvist to see what they have while Chicago needs to retool their roster. But yeah, I was clearly just looking at one roster. Nice job wink


Again, try understanding the other team's position...clearly you've done none of that. Boqvist, Murphy and Mitchell are our 3 RHD guys for the future; what does trading Murphy gain us? Bringing up some unknown guy that's not on our prospect list? You don't have a clue, this is obvious.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll