SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I have seen too many people butcher these

Created by: Silkysmooth42
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 31, 2020
Published: Jan. 31, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Stop trying to trade Urho and Studnicka. They are not going to be traded.
Stop overvaluing / undervaluing bruins prospects, stop overvaluing / undervaluing other teams players.
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Kase, Ondrej
Additional Details:
Kase = 2nd rounder (which is equal to 3rd rounder 5th rounder + tiny bit of the late 1st rounder) + Mid level prospect
ANA
  1. Backes, David
  2. Zboril, Jakub
  3. 2020 1st round pick (BOS)
  4. 2021 3rd round pick (BOS)
  5. 2022 5th round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Taking on Backes' contract = slightly less than the late 1st rounder
2.
LAK
  1. Forsbacka Karlsson, Jakob [Reserve List]
  2. Kuhlman, Karson
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Honestly give me feedback here.
I have seen trades that are T for a 2nd and a midlevel prospect, but based on his scoring im willing to bet it could be a little higher too. SO: the trade is something from this to this without JFK
3.
BOS
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (OTT)
Additional Details:
This happens at the Draft, bruins are gonna trade him after the playoffs onces he has been playing a good amount.
OTT
  1. 2022 7th round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
JOHN MOORE (Not a 7th rounder)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,971,667$0$2,432,500$2,528,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,600,000$4,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:25 p.m.
#1
Leafs suck )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 344
Likes: 61
Marleau= 1 year, $6.25M= 1st rounder

Your logic:

Backes= 2 years, $6M Cap hit, can’t even play= less than a first.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:26 p.m.
#2
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 976
"Kase = 2nd rounder" is just an arbitrary, and in my opinion, completely incorrect statement
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:29 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: ArizonaCoyotes
Marleau= 1 year, $6.25M= 1st rounder

Your logic:

Backes= 2 years, $6M Cap hit, can’t even play= less than a first.


Not my logic, pretty much everything thats been exaplined. Good try though

"It could be as simple as losing a draft pick, most likely a first round one"
More importantly, the 6 million is only for next year (because of cap rules they only take on the end of this years deal so like 2 million or something), so like Marleau it is only one year. Plus he isnt that bad that he wont make a team (like Nathan Horton or Geoffry Lupil) he just doesnt have a spot on the bruins roster due to their depth.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: MelonVK
"Kase = 2nd rounder" is just an arbitrary, and in my opinion, completely incorrect statement


Read more man! Good try though

"Kase = 2nd rounder (which is equal to 3rd rounder 5th rounder + tiny bit of the late 1st rounder) + Mid level prospect"

"""" + Mid level prospect"""""
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:35 p.m.
#5
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 976
Quoting: bsilk18
Read more man! Good try though

"Kase = 2nd rounder (which is equal to 3rd rounder 5th rounder + tiny bit of the late 1st rounder) + Mid level prospect"

"""" + Mid level prospect"""""


Yeah I still massively disagree
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:37 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: MelonVK
Yeah I still massively disagree


Thats fine! You are entitled to your opinion!
I have been reading articles, and it could be wrong. But before you go comment on peoples posts please just make sure u read enough
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:38 p.m.
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,835
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: ArizonaCoyotes
Marleau= 1 year, $6.25M= 1st rounder

Your logic:

Backes= 2 years, $6M Cap hit, can’t even play= less than a first.


Marleau = full NMC
Marleau = 35+ contract
Marleau = legit had to be traded to be cap complaint
Marleau = 4.25 million buyout cost.
Backes = none of those things.
Backes = 3 million buyout cost.

Not as similar as one would think.
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:39 p.m.
#8
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,835
Likes: 6,911
I think that’s a bit much for toffoli, but I’m not a fan of his game.
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:39 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 4,562
Quoting: ArizonaCoyotes
Marleau= 1 year, $6.25M= 1st rounder

Your logic:

Backes= 2 years, $6M Cap hit, can’t even play= less than a first.


not even the same situation. Using Marleau as a comp is terrible.
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:39 p.m.
#10
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 976
Quoting: bsilk18
Thats fine! You are entitled to your opinion!
I have been reading articles, and it could be wrong. But before you go comment on peoples posts please just make sure u read enough


Well tbf an entire paragraph was inserted there. Do you use any advanced metrics for player evaluation? Cause Kase is a monster by most ones
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:40 p.m.
#11
Cousins on the PP
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 236
Likes: 233
Quoting: ArizonaCoyotes
Marleau= 1 year, $6.25M= 1st rounder

Your logic:

Backes= 2 years, $6M Cap hit, can’t even play= less than a first.


Leafs had to move that 1st, as they wouldn't of been cap compliant without moving a big contract, every team and GM knew that and had leverage on them to acquire that 1st. Bruins don't have that leverage against them, so they don't have to move a 1st, as they are currently cap compliant. Thus, moving Backes won't require a 1st.
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:40 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I think that’s a bit much for toffoli, but I’m not a fan of his game.


Thats fair. I agree with you. I just didnt want people calling me a homer and saying "oh you just think kuhlman is a god" blah blah blah
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:40 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 6,101
Kings are going to want a 2020 2nd for Toffoli. Prospect is negotiable, but I don't think JFK gets it done.

As a Kings fan, my ideal target would be Lauko since he's expansion draft exempt, but I could see them accepting Senyshyn. Zboril is less likely, as the LHD is not a position of need for LA and would require protection in the expansion draft.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:41 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: MelonVK
Well tbf an entire paragraph was inserted there. Do you use any advanced metrics for player evaluation? Cause Kase is a monster by most ones


Lol i gotchu, gotta make sure people understand my think (to avoid comments like some annoying people lol)
Yeah again I didnt determine the value I am just going based on what I have read and seen a lot of (from ducks fans as well)
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:43 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Kings are going to want a 2020 2nd for Toffoli. Prospect is negotiable, but I don't think JFK gets it done.

As a Kings fan, my ideal target would be Lauko since he's expansion draft exempt, but I could see them accepting Senyshyn. Zboril is less likely, as the LHD is not a position of need for LA and would require protection in the expansion draft.


Both good points! Bruins probably dont wanna give up their first two picks in this draft, but there could be ways around this!!!
In all fairness, Kuhlman is the player going your way, and he is a young good RW with good top 6 potential. the 2nd and JFK were just to make is more even
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:44 p.m.
#16
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,835
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: bsilk18
Thats fair. I agree with you. I just didnt want people calling me a homer and saying "oh you just think kuhlman is a god" blah blah blah


People will do that no matter what. Post what you think is a good trade, and let others look like dopes when they don’t know what’s what.
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:45 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: ArizonaCoyotes
Marleau= 1 year, $6.25M= 1st rounder

Your logic:

Backes= 2 years, $6M Cap hit, can’t even play= less than a first.


Lol yeah u just got the whole hockey world defending me here, sorry man. Its tough, but yeah it will take at most a 1st to move, which is why the Kase deal works
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:45 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Bcarlo25
People will do that no matter what. Post what you think is a good trade, and let others look like dopes when they don’t know what’s what.


As much as we argue from time to time, I appreciate that lol
I promise you im not that big an idiot lol I try to be super neutral
Bcarlo25 liked this.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:46 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 6,101
Quoting: bsilk18
Both good points! Bruins probably dont wanna give up their first two picks in this draft, but there could be ways around this!!!
In all fairness, Kuhlman is the player going your way, and he is a young good RW with good top 6 potential. the 2nd and JFK were just to make is more even


Not sure why the Kings would want a 24 year old forward when they're rebuilding. The majority of their promising assets that will fuel the rebuild are 18-20. The Kings aren't going to want a guy that will be pushing 30 when the Kings are ready to compete again. If Kuhlman is the player that Boston is willing to give up for Toffoli, then I think the Kings move Toffoli elsewhere.
Gofnut999 liked this.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 1:49 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Not sure why the Kings would want a 24 year old forward when they're rebuilding. The majority of their promising assets that will fuel the rebuild are 18-20. The Kings aren't going to want a guy that will be pushing 30 when the Kings are ready to compete again. If Kuhlman is the player that Boston is willing to give up for Toffoli, then I think the Kings move Toffoli elsewhere.


Thats fair!!! He is definitely an older "young player" so that makes sense, but a lot of these US college players come into the league later (once they graduate) and then they excel!!!
In all fairness the kings also get JFK who is a good young prospect and a 2nd rounder. (some have been telling me its an overpayment)
Jan. 31, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 6,101
Quoting: bsilk18
Thats fair!!! He is definitely an older "young player" so that makes sense, but a lot of these US college players come into the league later (once they graduate) and then they excel!!!
In all fairness the kings also get JFK who is a good young prospect and a 2nd rounder. (some have been telling me its an overpayment)


With Boston's 2nd round pick expected to be in the 58-61st overall range, they're likely going to have to do better on the prospect front than a team like Calgary or Carolina who's 2nd will be 10 spots higher. JFK is a very high risk prospect that could work out, but is far more likely to be a bust. He hasn't exactly been tearing up the Swedish league this year. If he was expansion draft exempt, the Kings might be willing to take the risk on him, but he's not so they won't. At 23, he's not exactly young either.

Kings want a 2nd and B prospect for Toffoli. In Boston's case, they'll want a B+ for reasons explained above, but will be willing to consider guys that are expansion draft exempt. Lauko is the guy that fits all of those descriptions, so in my mind, that's the guy the Kings target.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 2:03 p.m.
#22
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,546
Likes: 11,169
Quoting: ArizonaCoyotes
Marleau= 1 year, $6.25M= 1st rounder

Your logic:

Backes= 2 years, $6M Cap hit, can’t even play= less than a first.


Carolina deliberately took a 6 million reduction in their cap on Marleau. Even if Backes gets bought out the terms won't be as severe.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 2:06 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: tkecanuck341
With Boston's 2nd round pick expected to be in the 58-61st overall range, they're likely going to have to do better on the prospect front than a team like Calgary or Carolina who's 2nd will be 10 spots higher. JFK is a very high risk prospect that could work out, but is far more likely to be a bust. He hasn't exactly been tearing up the Swedish league this year. If he was expansion draft exempt, the Kings might be willing to take the risk on him, but he's not so they won't. At 23, he's not exactly young either.

Kings want a 2nd and B prospect for Toffoli. In Boston's case, they'll want a B+ for reasons explained above, but will be willing to consider guys that are expansion draft exempt. Lauko is the guy that fits all of those descriptions, so in my mind, that's the guy the Kings target.


I know the bruins like Lauko, but to make the deal work that could definitely be possible!
Jan. 31, 2020 at 2:58 p.m.
#24
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,835
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Not sure why the Kings would want a 24 year old forward when they're rebuilding. The majority of their promising assets that will fuel the rebuild are 18-20. The Kings aren't going to want a guy that will be pushing 30 when the Kings are ready to compete again. If Kuhlman is the player that Boston is willing to give up for Toffoli, then I think the Kings move Toffoli elsewhere.


It’s not like 24 is over the hill. He’s a college player that signed as a free agent and has looked damn good in the time he’s gotten in the NHL. Gotta think he has 5-6 years before hitting a decline. Rebuilding teams should be all over cheap talent like that, especially given that there is ample cases of undersized forwards that were undrafted, and finally get a chance at significant ice time at the NHL level and became high end players. If I’m a rebuilding teams looking for players to give a chance to at the NHL level (you probably don’t want to do that with 18-20 year olds as it could break them), Kuhlman is the kinda guy I’m targeting.
Jan. 31, 2020 at 3:10 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 6,101
Quoting: Bcarlo25
It’s not like 24 is over the hill. He’s a college player that signed as a free agent and has looked damn good in the time he’s gotten in the NHL. Gotta think he has 5-6 years before hitting a decline. Rebuilding teams should be all over cheap talent like that, especially given that there is ample cases of undersized forwards that were undrafted, and finally get a chance at significant ice time at the NHL level and became high end players. If I’m a rebuilding teams looking for players to give a chance to at the NHL level (you probably don’t want to do that with 18-20 year olds as it could break them), Kuhlman is the kinda guy I’m targeting.


Sure, if the Kings could bring in Kuhlman in exchange for Forbort or something, I'm sure they'd consider it. However, Kuhlman isn't going to be the prize of the return in exchange for the 2nd best rental on the market this deadline.
Gofnut999 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll