SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Going all in now

Created by: Bruins47
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 7, 2020
Published: Feb. 7, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Thoughts?
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. 2020 7th round pick (CGY)
2.
CBJ
  1. Hughes, Cameron
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (BOS)
  3. 2020 6th round pick (BOS)
3.
BOS
  1. Dillon, Brenden ($1,600,000 retained)
  2. Thornton, Joe ($1,000,000 retained)
SJS
  1. Backes, David ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. Cehlárik, Peter
  3. Moore, John
  4. Zboril, Jakub
  5. 2021 5th round pick (BOS)
4.
BOS
  1. Kreider, Chris ($2,312,500 retained)
NYR
  1. Heinen, Danton
  2. Shen, Pavel
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (BOS)
5.
BOS
  1. 2020 7th round pick (PIT)
  2. 2021 6th round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
Part of thornton dillon deal
SJS
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the PIT
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$74,566,667$0$2,490,000$6,933,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,312,500$2,312,500
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$35,000$35,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$747,500$747,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 7, 2020 at 10:37 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
That Columbus isn’t going to sell Josh Anderson.... we have no reason to. Make an offer for him at the draft, Columbus isn’t selling at the deadline.
Friendly_Cannon and Viqsi liked this.
Feb. 7, 2020 at 10:37 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 8,836
Jax and Sharks decline easily.
Ajp_18 liked this.
Feb. 7, 2020 at 10:41 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Come on man. The sharks get three AHLers and David Backes back for Jumbo and Dillon? You must be joking
Feb. 7, 2020 at 10:42 p.m.
#4
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
1-We'll take that IMO. Add a pick if Kreids resign tho (maybe a 2022 3rd)
2-SJ won't touch that. Add a 2 picks
Feb. 7, 2020 at 10:54 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 8,836
Quoting: papishark
Come on man. The sharks get three AHLers and David Backes back for Jumbo and Dillon? You must be joking


Moore has a better Corsi rating than Dillion and Jumbo has 1 more goal than Backes despite doubling his minutes in triple the games.

Sharks decline, but this trade sucks for Boston too.
Feb. 7, 2020 at 11:00 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 4,422
Likes: 1,457
Lol this is garbage I know Columbus isn't going to trade Anderson. Every other trade but Cal is no no
Feb. 7, 2020 at 11:04 p.m.
#7
Billy739
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 1,629
do a 3 way with CBJ and SJS to make it easier

you want Backes out , Anderson and Thornton in
i think you got to get CBJ to retain on Backes before sending him to SJS .
Backes at a reasonable cap would be welcome on most teams so even if they dont keep him SJS can retain up to half his original salary and move him again to a contender for a good pick . (Hainsey,Plekanen and Timmonen are returns less talented players then Backes got at points they had their lowest value in years so Backes will bring in something worth moving him )
Feb. 7, 2020 at 11:22 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 3,768
Likes: 3,235
Quoting: Billy739
do a 3 way with CBJ and SJS to make it easier

you want Backes out , Anderson and Thornton in
i think you got to get CBJ to retain on Backes before sending him to SJS .
Backes at a reasonable cap would be welcome on most teams so even if they dont keep him SJS can retain up to half his original salary and move him again to a contender for a good pick . (Hainsey,Plekanen and Timmonen are returns less talented players then Backes got at points they had their lowest value in years so Backes will bring in something worth moving him )


No chance we retain on Backes. We have Dubois Gavrikov Korpisalo and Elvis coming off the books and need new deals. We just can’t afford to retain any unless it’s for like a first plus which is an extreme overpay.
Ajp_18 and Viqsi liked this.
Feb. 7, 2020 at 11:25 p.m.
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,120
Likes: 6,979
Get that San Jose deal out of here. The rest looks good.
Feb. 7, 2020 at 11:25 p.m.
#10
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,120
Likes: 6,979
Quoting: Ajp_18
That Columbus isn’t going to sell Josh Anderson.... we have no reason to. Make an offer for him at the draft, Columbus isn’t selling at the deadline.


Columbus has sooooo many reasons to sell Anderson. Like every possible reason.
Feb. 7, 2020 at 11:39 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Columbus has sooooo many reasons to sell Anderson. Like every possible reason.


Lmao no they don’t.... why do you sell before a playoff run? We didn’t sell Panarin and he basically told everyone he wasn’t going to stay. Was there an issue signing him last time, yes, this time there’s arbitration so there’s a hearing and he gets signed. If another team wants him enough he’s still an RFA and we get to match or take compensation from an offersheet. Selling Anderson makes no sense at the current time.

The only people who think we should sell him are the fans who want him for pennies because he has 4 points...
Friendly_Cannon and Viqsi liked this.
Feb. 8, 2020 at 10:47 a.m.
#12
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,632
Likes: 3,113
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Columbus has sooooo many reasons to sell Anderson. Like every possible reason.

I'm going to assume these reasons are "I want him", "I want him", "he should play for my team", "I want him on my team", and maybe something hopeful-for-non-Jackets-fans about contentious RFA signing.
Feb. 8, 2020 at 11:14 a.m.
#13
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,120
Likes: 6,979
Quoting: Viqsi
I'm going to assume these reasons are "I want him", "I want him", "he should play for my team", "I want him on my team", and maybe something hopeful-for-non-Jackets-fans about contentious RFA signing.


Well, I think it would be kind of naive to think that the jackets are going to get him extended with term. Him taking the 1 year deal and moving on is the likely scenario. Teams like trading for guys with a year of team control, so that gives him some added value now. Here are a few scenarios of how things play out.
1. They keep him. They make the playoffs. Get smoked in the first round. He has a bounce back season, and his value at the deadline is similar to what it is now because he’s a true rental at that point.
2. They keep him. The likely happens. They don’t make the playoffs, and he doesn’t have a bounce back year. His value is crushed.
3. They keep him. They keep him again. They lose him for nothing.

Look, the jackets aren’t good. If they keep the big picture in mind even a little bit, trading him makes a ton of sense.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll