SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Asking Prices for Rakell - EDM CBJ BOS STL WSH NYI PIT

Created by: Stgstg55
Team: 2019-20 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 8, 2020
Published: Feb. 8, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
What would these teams give up for the young stud
Trades
1.
2.
ANA
CBJ
    Rakell
    3.
    ANA
    EDM
      Rakell
      4.
      ANA
      NYI
        Rakell
        5.
        ANA
        STL
          Rakell
          6.
          ANA
          WSH
            Rakell
            7.
            ANA
            PIT
              Rakell
              Buyouts
              DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
              2020
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              2021
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              2022
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              Logo of the ANA
              ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
              24$81,500,000$64,778,118$0$2,050,000$16,721,882
              Left WingCentreRight Wing
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $1,541,000$1,541,000
              LW, C, RW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $8,250,000$8,250,000
              C
              NMC
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $5,250,000$5,250,000
              RW, LW
              M-NTC
              UFA - 5
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $1,498,925$1,498,925
              LW
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $6,875,000$6,875,000
              C, RW
              NMC
              UFA - 3
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $3,150,000$3,150,000
              RW, LW
              M-NTC
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $863,333$863,333
              LW, RW
              RFA - 2
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $1,456,250$1,456,250
              LW, C
              M-NTC
              UFA - 5
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $2,600,000$2,600,000
              RW
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $950,000$950,000
              LW, RW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $1,133,333$1,133,333
              C, RW
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $925,000$925,000
              LW, RW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
              RW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $700,000$700,000
              LW, C
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $863,333$863,333
              C, LW
              RFA - 2
              Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $6,500,000$6,500,000
              LD/RD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 7
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $2,050,000$2,050,000
              RD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 3
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $6,400,000$6,400,000
              G
              UFA - 8
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $2,602,778$2,602,778
              LD
              UFA - 3
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $4,000,000$4,000,000
              RD
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $1,125,000$1,125,000 (Performance Bonus$1,200,000$1M)
              G
              M-NTC
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $894,166$894,166
              LD
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $850,000$850,000
              RD
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $750,000$750,000
              LD
              UFA - 1

              Embed Code

              • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
              • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

              Text-Embed

              Click to Highlight
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 8:57 p.m.
              #1
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jan. 2017
              Posts: 6,470
              Likes: 1,982
              Blues fan here. I’m willing to give up Kyrou, a 2021 first and Walman?
              Stgstg55 liked this.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 8:59 p.m.
              #2
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Nov. 2018
              Posts: 5,138
              Likes: 5,938
              Quoting: Chopper02
              Blues fan here. I’m willing to give up Kyrou, a 2021 first and Walman?


              Ducks would pass imo, They would probably need a 2020 first to move Rakell and No real need for Walman seeing our org depth at LD

              Love Kyrou though
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:02 p.m.
              #3
              Thread Starter
              Xx_Zegras46_xX
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Dec. 2019
              Posts: 3,960
              Likes: 1,658
              Quoting: Salzy
              Ducks would pass imo, They would probably need a 2020 first to move Rakell and No real need for Walman seeing our org depth at LD

              Love Kyrou though


              Agreed. Wonder how much we’d need to equal out to get Faulk with a retained salary
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:03 p.m.
              #4
              CGY
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Dec. 2015
              Posts: 5,539
              Likes: 2,064
              Cross Edmonton off the list, really doubt Anaheim deals him within division, unless it’s a major overpay
              Stgstg55 liked this.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:04 p.m.
              #5
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jan. 2017
              Posts: 19,771
              Likes: 8,828
              1st, Heinen, prospect or 1st 2 prospects.

              Studnicka, Beecher, Urho off limits.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:04 p.m.
              #6
              Thread Starter
              Xx_Zegras46_xX
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Dec. 2019
              Posts: 3,960
              Likes: 1,658
              Quoting: ItWasIn
              Cross Edmonton off the list, really doubt Anaheim deals him within division, unless it’s a major overpay


              Edmonton is a playoff ready team. I could see them shopping for a winger but I see what youre saying
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:06 p.m.
              #7
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Mar. 2018
              Posts: 9,851
              Likes: 6,441
              Columbus really has no interest at this point... we need centers, not wings.
              Stgstg55 liked this.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:08 p.m.
              #8
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jan. 2017
              Posts: 6,470
              Likes: 1,982
              Quoting: Salzy
              Ducks would pass imo, They would probably need a 2020 first to move Rakell and No real need for Walman seeing our org depth at LD

              Love Kyrou though


              I’m okay with making the pick conditional. If they get so far in the playoffs. Defensive wise, I figured Walman could be a decent add in. Maybe a depth center like Stevens or Kaspick?
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:10 p.m.
              #9
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jan. 2017
              Posts: 6,470
              Likes: 1,982
              Quoting: MDA_47
              Agreed. Wonder how much we’d need to equal out to get Faulk with a retained salary


              Blues wouldn’t eat salary for 7 years. I’m thinking that would be a 1 for 1. Honestly though, I doubt the Blues do it.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:13 p.m.
              #10
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2018
              Posts: 7,261
              Likes: 2,706
              Quoting: MDA_47
              Agreed. Wonder how much we’d need to equal out to get Faulk with a retained salary


              Raks is miles better than Faulk, Faulk is a 3rd pairing PP merch getting paid WAY WAY WAY too much
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:15 p.m.
              #11
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2018
              Posts: 7,261
              Likes: 2,706
              Quoting: Chopper02
              I’m okay with making the pick conditional. If they get so far in the playoffs. Defensive wise, I figured Walman could be a decent add in. Maybe a depth center like Stevens or Kaspick?


              Love Kyrou, value wise, not bad, just no way I see the ducks moving Raks unless there's either an upgrade offensively coming back (obv ducks would probably add) or a stud RHD coming back, we have enough of everything else already
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:18 p.m.
              #12
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jan. 2017
              Posts: 6,470
              Likes: 1,982
              Quoting: AFOX10900
              Love Kyrou, value wise, not bad, just no way I see the ducks moving Raks unless there's either an upgrade offensively coming back (obv ducks would probably add) or a stud RHD coming back, we have enough of everything else already

              Don’t disagree. As much as I’d love Rakell, Blues probably aren’t the greatest trade partner.
              Dan10900 liked this.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:25 p.m.
              #13
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jul. 2016
              Posts: 8,007
              Likes: 3,222
              Caps would love to have him but don't have pieces that make sense. You are stacked at LHD and that's our strength as well.
              Stgstg55 and Dan10900 liked this.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 9:26 p.m.
              #14
              Thread Starter
              Xx_Zegras46_xX
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Dec. 2019
              Posts: 3,960
              Likes: 1,658
              Quoting: ClockReads2113
              Caps would love to have him but don't have pieces that make sense. You are stacked at LHD and that's our strength as well.


              Would’ve been ideal if Orlov was a RHD
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 10:09 p.m.
              #15
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jan. 2020
              Posts: 6,721
              Likes: 5,223
              Quoting: ItWasIn
              Cross Edmonton off the list, really doubt Anaheim deals him within division, unless it’s a major overpay


              Why? Ducks aren't a competitive team, Oilers are. Makes no sense not to trade him in division if the deal is good. Look what happened in Ottawa with Hoffman.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 10:12 p.m.
              #16
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2018
              Posts: 7,261
              Likes: 2,706
              Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
              Why? Ducks aren't a competitive team, Oilers are. Makes no sense not to trade him in division if the deal is good. Look what happened in Ottawa with Hoffman.


              I mean Raks is plenty young enough to kill the ducks for years, it's not like they won't be competitive for years, all they really need is 1-2 more high end forwards (why trading Raks is stupid), and 1 top 4 RHD (and like a year or two for the kids to fully develop)
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 10:12 p.m.
              #17
              Isles7
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 12,222
              Likes: 5,299
              Bode Wilde, kieffer bellows , and a 1st for rackell.
              Stgstg55 liked this.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 10:21 p.m.
              #18
              Log off the internet
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Mar. 2017
              Posts: 7,830
              Likes: 3,866
              I'd have to think TB would be interested
              Stgstg55 liked this.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 10:23 p.m.
              #19
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jan. 2020
              Posts: 6,721
              Likes: 5,223
              Quoting: AFOX10900
              I mean Raks is plenty young enough to kill the ducks for years, it's not like they won't be competitive for years, all they really need is 1-2 more high end forwards (why trading Raks is stupid), and 1 top 4 RHD (and like a year or two for the kids to fully develop)


              Sure, he's young enough, but if EDM is where you get the best return, then that's a pill you swallow when you're building for the future imo. Also, there's a pretty solid chance that they won't be competitive for the remainder of Rakell's contract. 2 more years after this... 2 more high end forwards, and a top 4 D, that's a tall order to fill in 2 years.
              Dan10900 liked this.
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 11:16 p.m.
              #20
              Thread Starter
              Xx_Zegras46_xX
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Dec. 2019
              Posts: 3,960
              Likes: 1,658
              Quoting: Isles777
              Bode Wilde, kieffer bellows , and a 1st for rackell.


              I like it
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 11:16 p.m.
              #21
              Thread Starter
              Xx_Zegras46_xX
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Dec. 2019
              Posts: 3,960
              Likes: 1,658
              Quoting: Hedman77
              I'd have to think TB would be interested


              What’s the offer
              Feb. 8, 2020 at 11:33 p.m.
              #22
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2018
              Posts: 7,261
              Likes: 2,706
              Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
              Sure, he's young enough, but if EDM is where you get the best return, then that's a pill you swallow when you're building for the future imo. Also, there's a pretty solid chance that they won't be competitive for the remainder of Rakell's contract. 2 more years after this... 2 more high end forwards, and a top 4 D, that's a tall order to fill in 2 years.


              I mean if it's a much better offer than sure, but if it's the difference of like a second or third round pick I'd much rather just take the less value, plus we already have 1 high end forward in the system (Zegras) and at least 2 more POTENTIAL top liners (Steel and Kase) along with a 2020 top 5ish pick... I'm not worried about that one or two more forwards, and the RHD man can be found in FA/trade as soon as this year (Guhle, Larson, and some forward specs could be used)
              Lindholm-Manson
              Fowler/Mahura-Fowler/x
              Mahura/Guhle-pick one of the 50 depth RHD we have
              Is not a bad defense, especially with Gibson in net, plus I highly doubt management let's him walk in two years, he's the face of the franchise (after Getz obv, and that doesn't mean he's the best player) and I think management is even higher on him than most fans are, he seems like a good locker room guy etc, they'll probably make it priority 1 to sign him to an extension as soon as possible
              Feb. 9, 2020 at 12:13 a.m.
              #23
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jan. 2020
              Posts: 6,721
              Likes: 5,223
              Quoting: AFOX10900
              I mean if it's a much better offer than sure, but if it's the difference of like a second or third round pick I'd much rather just take the less value, plus we already have 1 high end forward in the system (Zegras) and at least 2 more POTENTIAL top liners (Steel and Kase) along with a 2020 top 5ish pick... I'm not worried about that one or two more forwards, and the RHD man can be found in FA/trade as soon as this year (Guhle, Larson, and some forward specs could be used)
              Lindholm-Manson
              Fowler/Mahura-Fowler/x
              Mahura/Guhle-pick one of the 50 depth RHD we have
              Is not a bad defense, especially with Gibson in net, plus I highly doubt management let's him walk in two years, he's the face of the franchise (after Getz obv, and that doesn't mean he's the best player) and I think management is even higher on him than most fans are, he seems like a good locker room guy etc, they'll probably make it priority 1 to sign him to an extension as soon as possible


              When I mentioned Rakell's contract, I was referring to if he got traded. I was just trying to say that he may not even still be on that other team by the time the Ducks are good, so it would sting less.

              As for the rest of what you were saying, I think you're assuming a little too much. Unless you want to overpay for a guy who will quickly age out of his talent, FA isn't a great option. A trade for a good top 4 D is great in theory, but why do you think every other Leafs post on here is about acquiring Manson, answered by a chorus of Ducks fans who want an arm and a leg for him? They're not super easy to come by. I know you said "potential top liners" but based on what they've shown so far, Kase and Steel are, at best, 2nd line guys. Zegras is definitely a FANTASTIC prospect, but by the time he and "2020 top 5ish pick" come into their own, Manson will be 31 and a UFA.

              Now, considering the Ducks are in the VERY weak Pacific division, which is about to get weaker when Arizona is replaced with an expansion team, a pretty quick turn around is possible for them. But if I were a Ducks fan, I'd want them to take a little more time with it, do it properly and become a DOMINANT team for YEARS to come. They have the means to do this, which not a lot of teams near the Ducks in the standings can say.
               
              Reply
              To create a post please Login or Register
              Question:
              Options:
              Add Option
              Submit Poll