SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

SJS and PIT Healthy Line Up

Created by: SmugTkachuk
Team: 2019-20 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 11, 2020
Published: Feb. 11, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Bjugstad, Nick ($1,500,000 retained)
PIT
  1. Jankowski, Mark
  2. 2021 7th round pick (CGY)
Additional Details:
7th will become a 4th if Bjugstad can reach 25 points (Just above career average)
2.
SJS
  1. Gawdin, Glenn
  2. Gillies, Jon
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (CGY)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$68,601,709$0$322,500$12,898,291
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$715,000$715,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$550,000$550,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,650,400$4,650,400
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$755,833$755,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,635,000$1,635,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,857,143$3,857,143
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$730,833$730,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 11, 2020 at 3:15 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Isn’t Gillies career pretty much dead in the water?
Feb. 11, 2020 at 3:16 p.m.
#2
All-Team Pylon
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 515
Would rather have Bjugstad than Jankowski other than the cap space difference.... not sure why we retain or generally make that deal.
Feb. 11, 2020 at 3:29 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: papishark
Isn’t Gillies career pretty much dead in the water?


Nope, goalies are strange and a goalie with better numbers in the AHL than any goalie in the Sharks system that gets a chance to play is a fair gamble for San Jose, 26 isn't old for a goalie and he has been buried with Parsons, Zagidulin and a one off season of Nick Schnieder last year.

Quoting: Schlegel
Would rather have Bjugstad than Jankowski other than the cap space difference.... not sure why we retain or generally make that deal.


Jankowski is off the books next year, he gets a quick shot at a change of scenery, if it doesn't work out then no harm no foul. Maybe the conditions change a little for Bjugstad but performance based incentives should be good for the Penguins
Feb. 11, 2020 at 3:39 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,705
Likes: 994
Jankowski has been a special kind of terrible this season, but I think I would move Bjugs just for the cap difference, although I wouldn't retain any value.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll