SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

likely to be disliked thread

Created by: Wqrrior
Team: 2019-20 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 12, 2020
Published: Feb. 12, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
some of these trades (ie BUF and TBL) consider options next year
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Bowey, Madison
Additional Details:
neither player has worked w/ their team... and this is a Stevie Y type trade
2.
ANA
  1. 2020 7th round pick (VAN)
NYR
  1. Shore, Devin
Additional Details:
rangers will need a kreider roster replacement if that trade happens
3.
ANA
  1. Asplund, Rasmus
  2. Larsson, Johan
  3. Thompson, Tage
  4. 2021 2nd round pick (BUF)
  5. 2022 3rd round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
sabres getting restless for a 2C
4.
ANA
  1. Killorn, Alex
  2. Stephens, Mitchell
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (TBL)
TBL
  1. Kase, Ondrej
Additional Details:
get over kase's advanced stats and recognize that he will continue to lose value if not traded now
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the VAN
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$66,250,916$0$2,475,000$15,249,084
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,550,000$1,550,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,133,333$1,133,333
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 8
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000 (Performance Bonus$1,200,000$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 12, 2020 at 10:51 p.m.
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,487
Likes: 22,663
You think Killorn is going to waive his NTC from Tampa to the Ducks?
Feb. 12, 2020 at 10:55 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,313
Likes: 3,987
Quoting: palhal
You think Killorn is going to waive his NTC from Tampa to the Ducks?


i forgot to include that this thread includes next year too... I know he wouldn't, but I don't think ANA appears on his M-NTC
Feb. 13, 2020 at 12:47 a.m.
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: palhal
You think Killorn is going to waive his NTC from Tampa to the Ducks?


Nvm Killer has NTC. He's going for a 60 point season. TB is not moving him for Kase.
Feb. 13, 2020 at 1:18 a.m.
#4
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 2,896
If we aren’t accepting Kase advanced stats how does he get Killorn let alone that full package? You have to take into account both he and Ritchie drive play which coupled with TB cap crunch is the only way they move Killorn for Kase.

Also shore gets more than a 7th. Deslauriers got a 4th. Shore could get a 4th.
Feb. 13, 2020 at 6:14 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
So ANA trades one of their most important forwards (he is literally their only guy willing to stand in front of the net... The goals/points will come once the ducks get a high end forward or two) for an overpaid AHL d man... Hard hard pass, take out TT and Larson from the BUF trade and replace them with a pick of= value, to me they have 0 value, fun fact, Kase's advanced stats only slightly>better KiWWorn's, I'd consider that trade, and I doubt anything else in that trade brings much value, Stephens reminds me of like Tom Kuhnhackl lol, and if Tampa has good scouts, they'd realize (unlike people in this site) Kase is also one of if not ANA's best forward based off we test...
Feb. 13, 2020 at 6:44 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Pass on all of these.

Ritchie, whilst not what you hope for in a 10th OA pick, brings some much needed size and hitting to the line-up. He's also the only big-body we have suitable for sitting in front of the opposing teams netminder during the PP. He also brings a lot of intangibles to the team. He's movable, but not for Bowey Madison... not even close.

Shore could get more.

Need the veteran leadership that Henrique brings more than a bunch of high risk assets. The idea that we should trade all our older players for prospects and picks is just wrong. That's how you end up like BUF, unable to win. Henrique is one of the few players we have that has been to the SCFs. That knowledge and experience of knowing what it takes to win is vital if we're to turn things around.

We don't need another LW, we need help at RD.
awatt liked this.
Feb. 13, 2020 at 9:18 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 564
Quoting: mytduxfan
Pass on all of these.

Ritchie, whilst not what you hope for in a 10th OA pick, brings some much needed size and hitting to the line-up. He's also the only big-body we have suitable for sitting in front of the opposing teams netminder during the PP. He also brings a lot of intangibles to the team. He's movable, but not for Bowey Madison... not even close.

Shore could get more.

Need the veteran leadership that Henrique brings more than a bunch of high risk assets. The idea that we should trade all our older players for prospects and picks is just wrong. That's how you end up like BUF, unable to win. Henrique is one of the few players we have that has been to the SCFs. That knowledge and experience of knowing what it takes to win is vital if we're to turn things around.

We don't need another LW, we need help at RD.


I don't think moving everyone is the answer but I think you have to look at moving a few pieces. Anaheim is not in an "instant rebuild" situation like Toronto was for example. Toronto had a young controlled core that they added 3 top 10 forwards to, as well as a slew of other prospects at the same time. Even if they add another top-5 guy this year to Zegras, they probably aren't ready to make the NHL impact that Matthews/Marner/Nylander have as quickly.

My point is anybody who's deal is up in 2 or 3 seasons should be considered expendable. And especially if it's somebody you think they won't resign during the rebuild. You should be looking at moving Manson, Linholm, Rakell not because they are bad players you don't want, but because of the value they would have around the league. Add some top prospects from other systems, especially since not every prospect works out. You'll still have some veterans to help oversee the transition and help out the young guys until they are ready to takeover.

It sucks to trade away good players, but if it helps in the long run, it's the logical move, right?
Feb. 13, 2020 at 9:40 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: newballcoach
I don't think moving everyone is the answer but I think you have to look at moving a few pieces. Anaheim is not in an "instant rebuild" situation like Toronto was for example. Toronto had a young controlled core that they added 3 top 10 forwards to, as well as a slew of other prospects at the same time. Even if they add another top-5 guy this year to Zegras, they probably aren't ready to make the NHL impact that Matthews/Marner/Nylander have as quickly.


I don't know what an "instant rebuild" is. If you're suggesting we need to have a long, drawn-out rebuild, you're wrong. We have better prospects than TOR did when they started their rebuild, so you clearly don't know what you're talking about and are just trying to justify us moving some player that you want on your team (I assume it's Manson and I assume you want us to move for pennies on the dollar - get bent!).

If we add a top-5 guy to Zegras, Steel, Comtois, Terry, Lundestrom, Tracey, Groulx, Thrun, Mahura, Dostal... not to mention Rakell, Silf, Kase, Henrique, Lindholm, Fowler, Manson, Gudbranson, Gibson, we're well on the way to being competitive again. We've drafted extremely well with low-end picks and already have a host of good young talent coming through the ranks. They're taking time to develop into fully-fledged NHLers, so what? We're in no rush and certainly not in the **** the way TOR was before rebuilding. Didn't TOR miss the playoffs like 9 out 10 years before getting somewhat competitive again? Meanwhile, we made the playoffs 2 years ago and went to the WCFs 3 years ago, and that was pretty much with the same core as we have now (minus Kesler and a past-it Perry). Things really aren't as doom and gloom as you think over here.

Quoting: newballcoach
My point is anybody who's deal is up in 2 or 3 seasons should be considered expendable. And especially if it's somebody you think they won't resign during the rebuild. You should be looking at moving Manson, Linholm, Rakell not because they are bad players you don't want, but because of the value they would have around the league. Add some top prospects from other systems, especially since not every prospect works out. You'll still have some veterans to help oversee the transition and help out the young guys until they are ready to takeover.

It sucks to trade away good players, but if it helps in the long run, it's the logical move, right?


Move Lindholm? You're clueless dude. Moving Lindholm would leave us looking for another Lindholm and effectively bury us in a full-blown rebuild for the next 4-5 years. Even if Lindholm brings back a top-5 pick (which he wouldn't because those teams aren't interested in 26 year old D-men, no matter how good they are), it's a mystery box. It could bust and then we've just given up Lindholm, who will be a good top pairing D-man for the next 8-10 years, for nothing. You need to get it out of your head that we're rebuilding. We're not, we're transitioning from the Getzlaf and Perry-era. It's going to take a few years for the kids to take on the slack, but the talent is absolutely there, even if you choose not to see it.

Manson, Lindholm and Rakell will all be re-signed after their contracts are up... why wouldn't they be? Oh... to justify us moving them for pennies on the dollar to your team. Not happening bro!

We're like 1-2 years away from pushing for a playoff spot. Manson will be 30, Lindholm will be 28 and Rakell will be 29... holy ****... we better get rid of them now because 28-30 is practically ancient. We'll be lucky if they can still skate by then.

JT is 30 this year and TOR still sucks. Better get rid of him for picks. SMH!
Feb. 13, 2020 at 9:48 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 564
Quoting: mytduxfan
I don't know what an "instant rebuild" is. If you're suggesting we need to have a long, drawn-out rebuild, you're wrong. We have better prospects than TOR did when they started their rebuild, so you clearly don't know what you're talking about and are just trying to justify us moving some player that you want on your team (I assume it's Manson and I assume you want us to move for pennies on the dollar - get bent!).

If we add a top-5 guy to Zegras, Steel, Comtois, Terry, Lundestrom, Tracey, Groulx, Thrun, Mahura, Dostal... not to mention Rakell, Silf, Kase, Henrique, Lindholm, Fowler, Manson, Gudbranson, Gibson, we're well on the way to being competitive again. We've drafted extremely well with low-end picks and already have a host of good young talent coming through the ranks. They're taking time to develop into fully-fledged NHLers, so what? We're in no rush and certainly not in the **** the way TOR was before rebuilding. Didn't TOR miss the playoffs like 9 out 10 years before getting somewhat competitive again? Meanwhile, we made the playoffs 2 years ago and went to the WCFs 3 years ago, and that was pretty much with the same core as we have now (minus Kesler and a past-it Perry). Things really aren't as doom and gloom as you think over here.



Move Lindholm? You're clueless dude. Moving Lindholm would leave us looking for another Lindholm and effectively bury us in a full-blown rebuild for the next 4-5 years. Even if Lindholm brings back a top-5 pick (which he wouldn't because those teams aren't interested in 26 year old D-men, no matter how good they are), it's a mystery box. It could bust and then we've just given up Lindholm, who will be a good top pairing D-man for the next 8-10 years, for nothing. You need to get it out of your head that we're rebuilding. We're not, we're transitioning from the Getzlaf and Perry-era. It's going to take a few years for the kids to take on the slack, but the talent is absolutely there, even if you choose not to see it.

Manson, Lindholm and Rakell will all be re-signed after their contracts are up... why wouldn't they be? Oh... to justify us moving them for pennies on the dollar to your team. Not happening bro!

We're like 1-2 years away from pushing for a playoff spot. Manson will be 30, Lindholm will be 28 and Rakell will be 29... holy ****... we better get rid of them now because 28-30 is practically ancient. We'll be lucky if they can still skate by then.

JT is 30 this year and TOR still sucks. Better get rid of him for picks. SMH!


You are an angry little man. Please go give someone a hug and make sure you know that they love you. It's not great to be this upset on this internet, so if you need to talk to someone about your frustrations please do so. I am concerned for you after this post, please take care.
Feb. 13, 2020 at 10:16 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: newballcoach
You are an angry little man. Please go give someone a hug and make sure you know that they love you. It's not great to be this upset on this internet, so if you need to talk to someone about your frustrations please do so. I am concerned for you after this post, please take care.


If you don't want angry responses, don't troll an ANA thread with your clueless thoughts telling us we're "not in an instant rebuild situation like TOR was". You got wrekt brah. I knew you'd have no comeback... now back to NHL 20 with you.
Feb. 13, 2020 at 10:22 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 564
Quoting: mytduxfan
If you don't want angry responses, don't troll an ANA thread with your clueless thoughts telling us we're "not in an instant rebuild situation like TOR was". You got wrekt brah. I knew you'd have no comeback... now back to NHL 20 with you.


Just have a good day okay? Live well man, breathe a little bit and just enjoy yourself.

And try not to have unbelievable blinders assuming you are always right, your team is awesome and you know best. Listening instead of shouting will help you out.
Feb. 13, 2020 at 10:45 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: newballcoach
Just have a good day okay? Live well man, breathe a little bit and just enjoy yourself.

And try not to have unbelievable blinders assuming you are always right, your team is awesome and you know best. Listening instead of shouting will help you out.


Nah mate, you're just wrong and don't know what you're talking about on this one.

LMFAO!!! So not agreeing with you and your wrong opinion of my team = "unbelievable blinders" and "assuming I am always right". You can search my post history. I've even admitted that my team is bad right now and think they should stay bad to get a high pick. Funny that when you can't comeback to something I've actually said, you just make stuff up to comeback to.

I'm writing to you on a forum. How am I "shouting"? You got wrekt so hard you have no comeback. Better quit whilst you're behind and stop responding.
Feb. 13, 2020 at 11:02 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 564
Quoting: mytduxfan
Nah mate, you're just wrong and don't know what you're talking about on this one.

LMFAO!!! So not agreeing with you and your wrong opinion of my team = "unbelievable blinders" and "assuming I am always right". You can search my post history. I've even admitted that my team is bad right now and think they should stay bad to get a high pick. Funny that when you can't comeback to something I've actually said, you just make stuff up to comeback to.

I'm writing to you on a forum. How am I "shouting"? You got wrekt so hard you have no comeback. Better quit whilst you're behind and stop responding.


Are you sure you're okay? You seem very upset and your spelling seems a bit confused. It's not healthy to be unable to see other points of view. Other people are just trying to help you, maybe just calm down for once and accept their help. It's okay, you're not alone out there. Try to smile and enjoy your day.
Feb. 13, 2020 at 11:46 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: newballcoach
Are you sure you're okay? You seem very upset and your spelling seems a bit confused. It's not healthy to be unable to see other points of view.



Still no comeback!

Quoting: newballcoach
Other people are just trying to help you, (needs a full-stop you ****) maybe just calm down for once and accept their help. It's okay, you're not alone out there. Try to smile and enjoy your day.


You really gonna call me out on my spelling when your grammar all over the place. Calling me out my spelling is so weak... You got trashed son. You're clueless about hockey so have to comment on my spelling. Get wrekt!
Feb. 13, 2020 at 2:11 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 325
Likes: 129
These moves don't address any of our issues going forward. Rico is proving to one of our only forwards capable of providing offense despite this team being completely anemic. There is zero pressure to trade Kase. He's on an incredibly favorable contract and isn't slated to be a free agent when it's up. Sure he's injury prone but the value he provides on the ice absolutely outweighs whatever return we'd get considering everyone is probably gunshy about acquiring him. Killorn is a great player but I'm super weary about acquiring a winger in his 30s with that much term left, never mind the fact he won't waive his no-trade to come here.

We don't need to make any moves this year. This year is purely about getting our young players experience and hopefully landing a top-5 pick. There's really nothing we can do to seriously shape this team into a winner until we're out from under Getzy's contract and the bulk of Perry's buyout. We can ship Grant and Miller out in two weeks and recoup some more draft picks but that's about it. I'm about ready to cut bait on Ritchie but I think we can fetch more for him near the draft. His spot doesn't need to be opened up until Comtois is ready for full-time duty.
mytduxfan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll