SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Good or No

Created by: Tippy
Published: Feb. 14, 2020 at 12:12 a.m.
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Season Days: 50/186 (27%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Pittsburgh PenguinsPittsburgh Penguins

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Marino, JohnWaivers ExemptPittsburgh PenguinsNHL-$248,655111---5152025--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Kerfoot, AlexanderToronto Maple LeafsNHL30%$658,602111---5281624--
2020 2nd round pick (Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR)---010------
2020 4th round pick (Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR)---001------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$613,0772347683510
Change-$409,947000011
Final$203,130 (↓)23476836 (↑)11 (↑)3-40

Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsToronto Maple Leafs

Trade occurred while using LTIR
LTIR Relief: $20,975,000
LTIR Used Prior to Trade: $15,140,483
OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Kerfoot, AlexanderToronto Maple LeafsNHL30%$2,450,000111---5281624--
2020 2nd round pick (Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR)---010------
2020 4th round pick (Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR)---001------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Marino, JohnWaivers ExemptPittsburgh PenguinsNHL-$925,000111---5152025--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$5,834,5172349703516
Change$1,525,0000000-1-1
Final$7,359,517 (↑)23497034 (↓)15 (↓)-341
Feb. 14, 2020 at 1:35 a.m.
#1
Amplifys
Pocket Aces
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 667
Likes: 318
why in the hell would the pens trade marino exactly?
mikearky and BackslashT liked this.
Feb. 14, 2020 at 10:22 a.m.
#2
Yojimbo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
I'm okay with this from the Pens side.
Tippy liked this.
Feb. 14, 2020 at 12:23 p.m.
#3
Tippy
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 11
Likes: 1
Quoting: Amplifys
why in the hell would the pens trade marino exactly?


Quoting: Amplifys
why in the hell would the pens trade marino exactly?


Quoting: Amplifys
why in the hell would the pens trade marino exactly?


Quoting: Amplifys
why in the hell would the pens trade marino exactly?


Quoting: Amplifys
why in the hell would the pens trade marino exactly?


Quoting: Amplifys
why in the hell would the pens trade marino exactly?


Quoting: Amplifys
why in the hell would the pens trade marino exactly?


So they can make a playoff run and have someone to play alongside Crosby and Malkin. That’s not a bad trade for Pittsburgh
Feb. 14, 2020 at 12:53 p.m.
#4
Yojimbo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
Quoting: Amplifys
why in the hell would the pens trade marino exactly?


For the return. Kerfoot puts up Zucker-like offensive numbers (mid-40's points), but from the 3rd line. He is also better defensively, and is $2M less cap hit for 3+ years. He is the 3C Rutherford has been looking for. Plus a 2nd and 4th for good measure. If selling the farm for Zucker is okay, then this trade is good to go.

I am not targeting Kerfoot myself, but just going with the suggested trade.
Feb. 14, 2020 at 1:29 p.m.
#5
brgh4life
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,705
Likes: 994
No way. Marino is a cost controlled young RHD that is already a 2nd pairing defender. He is the reason Rutherford felt comfortable trading Addison. You would have to overpay wildly to get Marino. This isn't cutting it.
Feb. 14, 2020 at 3:46 p.m.
#6
Amplifys
Pocket Aces
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 667
Likes: 318
Quoting: Yojimbo
For the return. Kerfoot puts up Zucker-like offensive numbers (mid-40's points), but from the 3rd line. He is also better defensively, and is $2M less cap hit for 3+ years. He is the 3C Rutherford has been looking for. Plus a 2nd and 4th for good measure. If selling the farm for Zucker is okay, then this trade is good to go.

I am not targeting Kerfoot myself, but just going with the suggested trade.


ya its a bad trade lmao wingers come and go top 4 RD DO NOT stop smoking crack
Feb. 14, 2020 at 3:49 p.m.
#7
Amplifys
Pocket Aces
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 667
Likes: 318
Quoting: Amplifys
ya its a bad trade lmao wingers come and go top 4 RD DO NOT stop smoking crack


Quoting: Yojimbo
For the return. Kerfoot puts up Zucker-like offensive numbers (mid-40's points), but from the 3rd line. He is also better defensively, and is $2M less cap hit for 3+ years. He is the 3C Rutherford has been looking for. Plus a 2nd and 4th for good measure. If selling the farm for Zucker is okay, then this trade is good to go.

I am not targeting Kerfoot myself, but just going with the suggested trade.


mccann and bjugstad are fine at 3C so ya plus we dont need offense lmao
Feb. 14, 2020 at 6:13 p.m.
#8
Yojimbo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
Quoting: Amplifys
ya its a bad trade lmao wingers come and go top 4 RD DO NOT stop smoking crack


Quoting: Amplifys
mccann and bjugstad are fine at 3C so ya plus we dont need offense lmao


Kerfoot isn't a winger. 0-1
McCann is far better at wing than 3C. 0-2
Bjugstad is basically a failure on the Pens. 0-3

So, ahhhhhh, ya...
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll