Coleman just got 2 first-round picks and Tatar is twice the player he is

Lol. Coleman is one of the best 2 way wingers in the game. Tatar is a complimentary player. Coleman is on a cheaper contract that Tatar. Coleman gets more of a return than Tatar.

Well, I dont have any complement to give you after that comment. Got it?

Tatar gets a better return than Coleman every day of the week, what are you talking about. The guy is pace for 71 pts and has scored over 20 goals in the past 6 seasons.

Huh

Hockey isn't all about goals and points son. Coleman is younger, on a better contract, and much better defensively. You'd be lucky to get the same return that Coleman got for Tatar

Younger? Lmao hes 28 and Tatar is 29. Both have another year left to their contracts.

Coleman is -2 this season and was -19 last season.
Tatar is -3 this season and was +21 last season.

Aside from the obvious lopsided offensive point production, Tatar is better in almost every other aspect. Coleman is a third line player, Tatar is a first line player.

Its not even close, Tatar would fetch way more.

Blues say no.

28 is younger than 29, so thanks for making my first point even more clear.

& lol. Sorry please reply when you learn something about hockey. +/- is one of the worst stats that's tracked, everyone knows that. Go look at the underlying numbers, specifically the heat charts, to see how much better Coleman is than Tatar.

So no it's actually not lopsided once you know something. Not a chance Tatar gets more of a return.

A year younger for a guy with half the point production is irrelevant, in fact it makes it sound like your desperate to find positive points for a 3rd line plug who a team overpaid for.

The fact that you think pickle boy is worth more than Tatar proves that you know nothing about hockey. I guess every stat means nothing until its a stat Coleman is better at eh (let me guess hes got a better Corsi?)

Youre delusional if you think Tatar isn’t worth more. Devils robbed Tampa blind on that one. Not wasting another second of my time arguing with you if you actually think that.

A complimentary player is someone saying nice things about other people.

A complementary player is maginal to a team success.

Tatar is not a complementary player.

Lol. The fact that you think goals and points says everything about a players value actually says you know nothing about hockey and that you're probably an old hag who can't accept change or some kid who tries to act big but knows nothing.

Learn something. Then reply. Lmao.

A complimentary player means a player who doesn't drive play and is a beneficiary of his teammates driving play and he gets the points. Tatar is a complimentary player.

Yes! 40+ goals in the last 2 years because of Danault's and Gallagher's awesome passing skills!!! LoL

BTW, you STILL use the wrong word. The word you are looking for is complementary, not complimentary.