SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Getting Creative- Trade with Jets

Created by: Propeller09
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 20, 2020
Published: Feb. 20, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
It would essentially be

3rd pick/2nd rd pick for Backes contract

Heinen, 1st and Vaakainan for Ehlers.

Senysyhn is an add in with Potential. Kid has skill, but needs a change of scenery. I don't know I guess he could be switched out for (Zboril, Andersson, Frederic, JFK). Basically anyone not named Lauko, Beecher or Studnicka.
Trades
WPG
  1. Backes, David
  2. Heinen, Danton
  3. Senyshyn, Zach
  4. Vaakanainen, Urho
  5. 2020 1st round pick (BOS)
  6. 2021 3rd round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Backes waives for rest of this season/playoff run and then gets bought out at 4m and 2m cap hit. This will free money up for when Laine and Pionk are RFA's again. I don't see how they pay Ehlers, Laine & Connor.

It helps them this year because I'd take Backes over Bourque or Shaw, at least for a short term playoff run. I know they have a few guys on the IR, but they don't currently have anyone in their lineup over 30 other than Wheeler. A leader would help this team.

*2021 Becomes 2nd rd pick if Bruins make it to SCF
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$76,469,167$0$2,490,000$5,030,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$747,500$747,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:14 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Gonna take a 1st to move Backes contract or at least two 2nd rounders
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:20 a.m.
#2
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,091
Likes: 6,971
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Gonna take a 1st to move Backes contract or at least two 2nd rounders


Why?
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:22 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Why?


Cause he isn't good and his contract sucks. The Bruins have been trying to trade him half retained with assets and nobody wants him.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:29 a.m.
#4
Cousins on the PP
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 236
Likes: 233
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Why?


Because he's a Leafs fan who thinks Marleau's trade is the compromise every team dumping cap has to follow
Bcarlo25 and Propeller09 liked this.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.
#5
jimmyjets
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 932
Likes: 317
This is an easy no from the Jets. It's quantity for quality. The upgrade from Backes to Bourque/Shaw doesn't really matter because 1) Neither of those guys will be in the lineup when we get healthy and 2) the downgrade from Ehlers to whomever we put there would greatly exceed any gains Backes may give us.

You'll need to give up a 1st to get someone to take Backes and buy him out for you so the trade is really Ehlers for Heinen (Depth forward), Senyshen (not Kyle Connor, bwhahahah) and is pretty much looking like a bust, another high potential prospect LD (which we don't need, if he was a RD than maybe) and a 3rd round pick.

I would contemplate Backes + your 1st for future considerations.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:32 a.m.
#6
Jetsfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 7,983
Likes: 2,589
It would be one thing if the Jets were giving up on the season...as in selling Ehlers...but they are not so he won't be moved...unless its for McAvoy
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:32 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: brady37
Because he's a Leafs fan who thinks Marleau's trade is the compromise every team dumping cap has to follow


If they trade him for a 3rd I will admit you are right... if not...
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:38 a.m.
#8
Cousins on the PP
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 236
Likes: 233
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
If they trade him for a 3rd I will admit you are right... if not...


I just don't think he'll get moved because of that extra year. Maybe next deadline to a seller with cap space. Anyways, he'll be easier to move in February 2021 when he only has 2 months left of pay on his contract.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:49 a.m.
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,091
Likes: 6,971
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Cause he isn't good and his contract sucks. The Bruins have been trying to trade him half retained with assets and nobody wants him.


Why does it take a 1st?
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:49 a.m.
#10
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,091
Likes: 6,971
Quoting: brady37
Because he's a Leafs fan who thinks Marleau's trade is the compromise every team dumping cap has to follow


That’s what i was expecting haha
brady37 liked this.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:53 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
Quoting: Jetman
It would be one thing if the Jets were giving up on the season...as in selling Ehlers...but they are not so he won't be moved...unless its for McAvoy


so you dont want a first round pick. a 3rd round pick. a 3rd line winger. and a top 4 projecting left shot dman (he would be top pair with bruins). for a top 6 forward? take backes out of it. like you realize youre defense is crap at best right?
Feb. 20, 2020 at 10:54 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
Quoting: brady37
I just don't think he'll get moved because of that extra year. Maybe next deadline to a seller with cap space. Anyways, he'll be easier to move in February 2021 when he only has 2 months left of pay on his contract.


they can buy him out in the offseason save an extra mill on their cap next year by moving it to 2022. and it costs them ZERO in assets. no chance they send anything of real value back to move him.
brady37 liked this.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 11:03 a.m.
#13
Jetsfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 7,983
Likes: 2,589
Quoting: hanson493
so you dont want a first round pick. a 3rd round pick. a 3rd line winger. and a top 4 projecting left shot dman (he would be top pair with bruins). for a top 6 forward? take backes out of it. like you realize youre defense is crap at best right?


All it takes is 2 MB born players in UFA to solidify the top 4....Without losing Ehlers
Feb. 20, 2020 at 11:16 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Gonna take a 1st to move Backes contract or at least two 2nd rounders


It won't. Sigh...
Feb. 20, 2020 at 11:24 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Jetman
It would be one thing if the Jets were giving up on the season...as in selling Ehlers...but they are not so he won't be moved...unless its for McAvoy


lol. That would be like the Bruins being like we'll move Krejci but only for Schiefele. I am not sure you understand how good McAvoy is. It's fine if you think my deal is bad, but in no world is ehlers worth McAvoy.
He is a nice player than benefits from being the 5th option on an offensively loaded team. Connor, Laine, Schiefele, Wheeler then Ehlers.

You are right though. If he is dealt it would be for immediate help on D not future. Although if we are being honest, do the jets really have a chance this year? Trouba is better than Pionk and Buff is better than nobody. Plus you are incredibly banged up. I don't know. I don't see it this year for Jets,
Feb. 20, 2020 at 11:25 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: jimmyjets
This is an easy no from the Jets. It's quantity for quality. The upgrade from Backes to Bourque/Shaw doesn't really matter because 1) Neither of those guys will be in the lineup when we get healthy and 2) the downgrade from Ehlers to whomever we put there would greatly exceed any gains Backes may give us.

You'll need to give up a 1st to get someone to take Backes and buy him out for you so the trade is really Ehlers for Heinen (Depth forward), Senyshen (not Kyle Connor, bwhahahah) and is pretty much looking like a bust, another high potential prospect LD (which we don't need, if he was a RD than maybe) and a 3rd round pick.

I would contemplate Backes + your 1st for future considerations.


The Bruins say no. not worth it. We'll buy him out at 4m cap hit. we are in fine cap shape.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 11:27 a.m.
#17
Jetsfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 7,983
Likes: 2,589
Quoting: Propeller09
lol. That would be like the Bruins being like we'll move Krejci but only for Schiefele. I am not sure you understand how good McAvoy is. It's fine if you think my deal is bad, but in no world is ehlers worth McAvoy.
He is a nice player than benefits from being the 5th option on an offensively loaded team. Connor, Laine, Schiefele, Wheeler then Ehlers.


Its not me wanting Ehlers on my team...its you.

So if BOS wants him that bad...they are gonna pay....

Your trade only happens with a team that isnt competing...and want prospects so they can compete in a few years. Losing Ehlers just sets back the Jets
Feb. 20, 2020 at 11:31 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Jetman
All it takes is 2 MB born players in UFA to solidify the top 4....Without losing Ehlers


Pulock is probably the best and I don't see Isles letting him go, and I don't think Hamonic or edmundson puts you over when he couldn't for Calgary who was stacked on D
Feb. 20, 2020 at 11:32 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Jetman
Its not me wanting Ehlers on my team...its you.

So if BOS wants him that bad...they are gonna pay....

Your trade only happens with a team that isnt competing...and want prospects so they can compete in a few years. Losing Ehlers just sets back the Jets


I agree and edited my response. I just don't think you guys get in this year.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 11:33 a.m.
#20
Jetsfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 7,983
Likes: 2,589
Quoting: Propeller09
Pulock is probably the best and I don't see Isles letting him go, and I don't think Hamonic or edmundson puts you over when he couldn't for Calgary who was stacked on D


Hamonic is a top 4 D who will play shut down with Morrissey, Edmundson can play a defensive role so Pionk can score.

As for the other RD UFAs, if we can get one of them for a decent cap hit, then sure
Feb. 20, 2020 at 12:03 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: Propeller09
It won't. Sigh...


Okay take him and the 3rd out of the trade then
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll