SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who wants Rakell Come and get him

Created by: GoodGuyGudas
Team: 2019-20 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 22, 2020
Published: Feb. 22, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Leave some offers
Trades
1.
2.
ANA
    Leave some offers. Any team name your price
    NYI
    Buyouts
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    2021
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    2022
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$65,375,618$0$2,182,500$16,124,382
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,541,000$1,541,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $8,250,000$8,250,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $3,150,000$3,150,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,498,925$1,498,925
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    C, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $950,000$950,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $863,333$863,333
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,456,250$1,456,250
    LW, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $700,000$700,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,133,333$1,133,333
    C, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $863,333$863,333
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,050,000$2,050,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,400,000$6,400,000
    G
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,602,778$2,602,778
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,125,000$1,125,000 (Performance Bonus$1,200,000$1M)
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $894,166$894,166
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $850,000$850,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $750,000$750,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 7:53 p.m.
    #1
    LafreneiretoKravtsov
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2016
    Posts: 2,431
    Likes: 835
    Deangelo. Straight up.
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 7:54 p.m.
    #2
    Rangers 2024
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 19,071
    Likes: 5,438
    Kravtsov+?
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 7:58 p.m.
    #3
    Hockey Fan13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2019
    Posts: 3,971
    Likes: 2,514
    Dumba
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 7:58 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Formerly Los Patos
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2019
    Posts: 3,535
    Likes: 2,059
    Quoting: Paul13
    Dumba


    Sure
    OutCold13 liked this.
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 7:58 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Formerly Los Patos
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2019
    Posts: 3,535
    Likes: 2,059
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    Kravtsov+?


    What else
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 8:00 p.m.
    #6
    Leafs suck )
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2020
    Posts: 344
    Likes: 61
    What could BUF offer?
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 8:02 p.m.
    #7
    Being wrong is ok
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 703
    Likes: 354
    @DarkShadowZz @Paul13 No we don't!!!!! stupid trade for us
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 8:03 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2018
    Posts: 2,632
    Likes: 1,141
    Does he play C or LW/RW?
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 8:07 p.m.
    #9
    Thread Starter
    Formerly Los Patos
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2019
    Posts: 3,535
    Likes: 2,059
    Quoting: TheresAlwaysNextYear
    Does he play C or LW/RW?


    He’s better at wing
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 8:29 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 1,460
    Likes: 462
    Quoting: Josh
    Deangelo. Straight up.


    Not interested in buying high on DeAngelo. Nils Lundkvist + 1st is what we’d want.

    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    Kravtsov+?


    ANA doesn’t do Russians

    Quoting: Paul13
    Dumba


    Pass. Need a RHD prospect and pick.
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 8:51 p.m.
    #11
    Bo Horvat enjoyer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2019
    Posts: 10,716
    Likes: 11,955
    Bode Wilde, a 1st and Dal Colle
    GoodGuyGudas liked this.
    Feb. 22, 2020 at 9:08 p.m.
    #12
    Canucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2018
    Posts: 852
    Likes: 351
    Stecher, Baertschi and Lind
    Feb. 23, 2020 at 10:47 a.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 1,460
    Likes: 462
    Quoting: AndrewLadd
    Bode Wilde, a 1st and Dal Colle


    Pass. That’s less than what Zucker got.

    Quoting: Tmclean64
    Stecher, Baertschi and Lind


    Doesn’t meet any of our needs.
    Feb. 23, 2020 at 10:49 a.m.
    #14
    Bo Horvat enjoyer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2019
    Posts: 10,716
    Likes: 11,955
    Quoting: mytduxfan
    Pass. That’s less than what Zucker got.



    Doesn’t meet any of our needs.


    what if i sub Bellows for Dal Colle and add a 2nd
    Feb. 23, 2020 at 11:01 a.m.
    #15
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 1,460
    Likes: 462
    Quoting: AndrewLadd
    what if i sub Bellows for Dal Colle and add a 2nd


    Definitely better and a very strong offer. I’d pass personally though. Would need a Dobson level RHD prospect coming back for me to pull the trigger, but understand why he’s unavailable.
    AndrewLadd liked this.
    Feb. 23, 2020 at 11:14 a.m.
    #16
    Rangers 2024
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 19,071
    Likes: 5,438
    Quoting: mytduxfan
    Pass. That’s less than what Zucker got.


    Maybe because zucker is better and worth more than rakell
    Feb. 23, 2020 at 11:50 a.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 1,460
    Likes: 462
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    Maybe because zucker is better and worth more than rakell


    How exactly?
    Feb. 23, 2020 at 8:24 p.m.
    #18
    Rangers 2024
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 19,071
    Likes: 5,438
    Quoting: mytduxfan
    How exactly?


    Because hes better offensively, and defensively, and has more term, and hes much more consistent
    Feb. 23, 2020 at 8:51 p.m.
    #19
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 1,460
    Likes: 462
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    Because hes better offensively, and defensively, and has more term, and hes much more consistent


    How can a guy whose peak goals and points in one season is 1 goal and 5 pts less than Rakell's and whose P/GP is 0.54 vs. Rakel's 0.63 be better offensively? I think you'll struggle to justify that one.

    Better defensively? Ok, sure. I won't pretend to have watched Zucker enough to say he's worse defensively. Rakell is ok defensively, but nothing special. So I'll assume Zucker is better. However, I am sure the difference (if any) is small. Zucker isn't some Selke nominated winger or anything, so let's not pretend that his defensive game is leaps and bounds beyond Rakell's. Moreover, they're scoring wingers, so they're getting paid to score and the focus of their game will be putting the puck in the net.

    More term? I'd give you that if Zucker wasn't being paid 5.5M vs. Rakell's <$4M? I mean, we're talking about 1 year here. You're going to have to explain why a contending team that is close to cap would value 1 more year at a more expensive rate for a guy who is less offensively-gifted (as established above) than Rakell. Surely, if you're that close to the cap and pinching every $, you take the cheaper and offensively better guy. I mean, Rakell still has 3 full playoff runs left, so it's not like he's on <$4M now and then going to get a massive increase next year or something. Rakell is also younger, so you're getting a player in his prime years for longer. Yeah, I don't think any contending team will say that Zucker is more valuable because he has more term.

    Zucker is more consistent? Yeah, he's more consistent because Rakell has 2 x 30+ goal seasons whereas Zucker only has 1. So yeah, he consistently produces less than Rakell. That's not an upside. I mean, if you're specifically referring to Rakell's down year this year, Zucker has a similar points total. Again, don't think consistency adds value. Production is key and Rakell is better at producing.


    Rakell is younger, better offensively, cheaper than Zucker. His contract adds massive value because contending teams don't have the cap for big contracts and he comes with enough term for 3 x playoff runs. For these reasons, he should return more than Zucker.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll